SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Hurrican Irma at 11:00 AM ET, Sunday, September 10, 2017. Category 4: Sustained winds of 130MPH, gusts to 160MPH
Hurricane Irma to Spend Sunday Raking Florida's West Coast
Forecasters warned that the entire Florida peninsula — including the Miami metropolitan area of 6 million people — was in peril
Sep 10, 2017
Hurricane Irma finally plowed into the Florida Keys early Sunday morning beginning a day long raking along Florida's west coast toward a possible landfall in the Tampa-St. Petersburg area.
An untold number of people refused to evacuate Key West and the other keys believing they could successfully ride out the storm.
Forecasters warned that the entire Florida peninsula -- including the Miami metropolitan area of 6 million people -- was in peril from the monstrous storm, almost 400 miles wide.
Two Florida nuclear power plants potentially in the path of Hurricane Irma could exacerbate what is already predicted to become a major disaster for the state because nuclear emergency evacuation plans are unrealistic and likely unworkable in real life conditions, warned Beyond Nuclear, a national anti-nuclear watchdog organization said Saturday.
The nuclear emergency plans, the group said, do not account for the destruction already caused by mega-storm conditions that could see emergency workers unable to cope with an added radiological disaster.
"Hurricanes like Irma and Harvey serve as an ominous reminder that the continued existence of nuclear power plants means the risk of an accident that could lead to widespread exposure to radiation and to radioactive contamination that could last decades or longer," said Paul Gunter, Director of the Reactor Oversight Project at Beyond Nuclear.
"This would come on top of the terrible devastation already caused by the storm itself," he added. "Much of the radiological emergency plans presently on paper would never work in reality."
And, some of the nation's most contaminated toxic waste sites are also at risk from Hurricane Irma. Republican Sen. Marco Rubio said the EPA workers he's spoken with seem "generally positive" about the prospects for toxic sites remaining secure in the coming hurricane. But "they can't guarantee it 100 percent," he told AP Saturday.
"EPA feels they got a handle on it." he said. "They think that the risk is real but certainly not as severe as some other places. Not to minimize it -- it's something to think about."
The predicted track of Hurricane Irma has changed many times over the past week. It seemed to be headed toward Miami causing many on the west coast of the state to feel safe and not evacuate.
More accurate predictions are possible, said Jeff Masters, director of meteorology for Weather Underground, but they require an enormous investment in research -- something that the United States has failed to do, Masters told the New York Times.
Dr. Masters cited a 2007 report from the National Science Foundation's National Science Board that concluded the United States should spend $300 million a year on "urgently needed hurricane science and engineering research and education." That is 10 times what the nation currently spends. "They said the benefits of that investment would pay off -- and now we're seeing exactly what they were talking about," he said.
"With climate change expected to make the strongest hurricanes stronger in coming decades, storms like Harvey and Irma will assault our coasts with increasing frequency," Dr. Masters said. "Our hurricane vulnerability problem is going to get progressively worse unless we dedicate more resources to the problem."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Hurricane Irma finally plowed into the Florida Keys early Sunday morning beginning a day long raking along Florida's west coast toward a possible landfall in the Tampa-St. Petersburg area.
An untold number of people refused to evacuate Key West and the other keys believing they could successfully ride out the storm.
Forecasters warned that the entire Florida peninsula -- including the Miami metropolitan area of 6 million people -- was in peril from the monstrous storm, almost 400 miles wide.
Two Florida nuclear power plants potentially in the path of Hurricane Irma could exacerbate what is already predicted to become a major disaster for the state because nuclear emergency evacuation plans are unrealistic and likely unworkable in real life conditions, warned Beyond Nuclear, a national anti-nuclear watchdog organization said Saturday.
The nuclear emergency plans, the group said, do not account for the destruction already caused by mega-storm conditions that could see emergency workers unable to cope with an added radiological disaster.
"Hurricanes like Irma and Harvey serve as an ominous reminder that the continued existence of nuclear power plants means the risk of an accident that could lead to widespread exposure to radiation and to radioactive contamination that could last decades or longer," said Paul Gunter, Director of the Reactor Oversight Project at Beyond Nuclear.
"This would come on top of the terrible devastation already caused by the storm itself," he added. "Much of the radiological emergency plans presently on paper would never work in reality."
And, some of the nation's most contaminated toxic waste sites are also at risk from Hurricane Irma. Republican Sen. Marco Rubio said the EPA workers he's spoken with seem "generally positive" about the prospects for toxic sites remaining secure in the coming hurricane. But "they can't guarantee it 100 percent," he told AP Saturday.
"EPA feels they got a handle on it." he said. "They think that the risk is real but certainly not as severe as some other places. Not to minimize it -- it's something to think about."
The predicted track of Hurricane Irma has changed many times over the past week. It seemed to be headed toward Miami causing many on the west coast of the state to feel safe and not evacuate.
More accurate predictions are possible, said Jeff Masters, director of meteorology for Weather Underground, but they require an enormous investment in research -- something that the United States has failed to do, Masters told the New York Times.
Dr. Masters cited a 2007 report from the National Science Foundation's National Science Board that concluded the United States should spend $300 million a year on "urgently needed hurricane science and engineering research and education." That is 10 times what the nation currently spends. "They said the benefits of that investment would pay off -- and now we're seeing exactly what they were talking about," he said.
"With climate change expected to make the strongest hurricanes stronger in coming decades, storms like Harvey and Irma will assault our coasts with increasing frequency," Dr. Masters said. "Our hurricane vulnerability problem is going to get progressively worse unless we dedicate more resources to the problem."
Hurricane Irma finally plowed into the Florida Keys early Sunday morning beginning a day long raking along Florida's west coast toward a possible landfall in the Tampa-St. Petersburg area.
An untold number of people refused to evacuate Key West and the other keys believing they could successfully ride out the storm.
Forecasters warned that the entire Florida peninsula -- including the Miami metropolitan area of 6 million people -- was in peril from the monstrous storm, almost 400 miles wide.
Two Florida nuclear power plants potentially in the path of Hurricane Irma could exacerbate what is already predicted to become a major disaster for the state because nuclear emergency evacuation plans are unrealistic and likely unworkable in real life conditions, warned Beyond Nuclear, a national anti-nuclear watchdog organization said Saturday.
The nuclear emergency plans, the group said, do not account for the destruction already caused by mega-storm conditions that could see emergency workers unable to cope with an added radiological disaster.
"Hurricanes like Irma and Harvey serve as an ominous reminder that the continued existence of nuclear power plants means the risk of an accident that could lead to widespread exposure to radiation and to radioactive contamination that could last decades or longer," said Paul Gunter, Director of the Reactor Oversight Project at Beyond Nuclear.
"This would come on top of the terrible devastation already caused by the storm itself," he added. "Much of the radiological emergency plans presently on paper would never work in reality."
And, some of the nation's most contaminated toxic waste sites are also at risk from Hurricane Irma. Republican Sen. Marco Rubio said the EPA workers he's spoken with seem "generally positive" about the prospects for toxic sites remaining secure in the coming hurricane. But "they can't guarantee it 100 percent," he told AP Saturday.
"EPA feels they got a handle on it." he said. "They think that the risk is real but certainly not as severe as some other places. Not to minimize it -- it's something to think about."
The predicted track of Hurricane Irma has changed many times over the past week. It seemed to be headed toward Miami causing many on the west coast of the state to feel safe and not evacuate.
More accurate predictions are possible, said Jeff Masters, director of meteorology for Weather Underground, but they require an enormous investment in research -- something that the United States has failed to do, Masters told the New York Times.
Dr. Masters cited a 2007 report from the National Science Foundation's National Science Board that concluded the United States should spend $300 million a year on "urgently needed hurricane science and engineering research and education." That is 10 times what the nation currently spends. "They said the benefits of that investment would pay off -- and now we're seeing exactly what they were talking about," he said.
"With climate change expected to make the strongest hurricanes stronger in coming decades, storms like Harvey and Irma will assault our coasts with increasing frequency," Dr. Masters said. "Our hurricane vulnerability problem is going to get progressively worse unless we dedicate more resources to the problem."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.