SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In this handout photo released by the South Korean Defense Ministry, South Korean navy vessels taking part in a naval drill off the east coast on September 4, 2017 in East Sea, South Korea. The exercise takes place two days after North Korea's latest nuclear test, which was condemned by world leaders. U.S. Ambassador to U.N. Nikki Haley described Kim Jong-un is 'begging for war' at an emergency security council meeting. (Photo by South Korean Defense Ministry via Getty Images)
Trump to Urge UN to Impose North Korean Naval Blockade, Oil Embargo
"Any attempt to board or divert a North Korean vessel could trigger an exchange of fire."
Sep 09, 2017
The U.S. notified the United Nations Security Council late Friday of its plan to call a vote Monday on an aggressive new Trump administration resolution to impose new sanctions on North Korea.
The UK's Observer is reporting Saturday:
"The most striking language in the draft United Nations resolution seen by the Observer authorizes naval vessels of any UN member state to inspect North Korean ships suspected of carrying banned cargo and to use "all necessary measures to carry out such inspections". The implications of such a resolution would be far-reaching. Any attempt to board or divert a North Korean vessel could trigger an exchange of fire."
The draft resolution would also block the country's exports of textiles and ban employment of its guest workers by other countries, Bloomberg reports. The resolution also seeks to freeze North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's assets, according to the report.
Such a dramatic tightening of the economic vice is likely to meet resistance from China, which is anxious to avoid driving its embattled neighbor to the point of complete collapse; and Russia, which is promoting itself as a broker in the Korean standoff and has suggested that a new set of sanctions is "premature," according to the Observer.
"Up to now, the Chinese and the Russians have tried to keep on giving the US just enough to keep Trump playing the UN game," said Richard Gowan, an expert on the UN at the European Council for Foreign Relations. "The question is what happens with an extraordinarily hardline resolution and US pressure to do something quickly."
Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the UN, requested that the UN Security Council vote on the draft resolution on September 11th. To pass, a UN resolution would need nine votes in favor and no vetoes by any of the 15-member Security Council's permanent members, the United States, Britain, France, Russia, or China.
Professor Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, describes blockades under international and US law as: "belligerent measures taken by a nation (to) prevent passage of vessels or aircraft to and from another country. Customary international law recognizes blockades as an act of war because of the belligerent use of force even against third party nations in enforcing the blockade. Blockades as acts of war have been recognized as such in the Declaration of Paris of 1856 and the Declaration of London of 1909 that delineate the international rules of warfare."
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The U.S. notified the United Nations Security Council late Friday of its plan to call a vote Monday on an aggressive new Trump administration resolution to impose new sanctions on North Korea.
The UK's Observer is reporting Saturday:
"The most striking language in the draft United Nations resolution seen by the Observer authorizes naval vessels of any UN member state to inspect North Korean ships suspected of carrying banned cargo and to use "all necessary measures to carry out such inspections". The implications of such a resolution would be far-reaching. Any attempt to board or divert a North Korean vessel could trigger an exchange of fire."
The draft resolution would also block the country's exports of textiles and ban employment of its guest workers by other countries, Bloomberg reports. The resolution also seeks to freeze North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's assets, according to the report.
Such a dramatic tightening of the economic vice is likely to meet resistance from China, which is anxious to avoid driving its embattled neighbor to the point of complete collapse; and Russia, which is promoting itself as a broker in the Korean standoff and has suggested that a new set of sanctions is "premature," according to the Observer.
"Up to now, the Chinese and the Russians have tried to keep on giving the US just enough to keep Trump playing the UN game," said Richard Gowan, an expert on the UN at the European Council for Foreign Relations. "The question is what happens with an extraordinarily hardline resolution and US pressure to do something quickly."
Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the UN, requested that the UN Security Council vote on the draft resolution on September 11th. To pass, a UN resolution would need nine votes in favor and no vetoes by any of the 15-member Security Council's permanent members, the United States, Britain, France, Russia, or China.
Professor Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, describes blockades under international and US law as: "belligerent measures taken by a nation (to) prevent passage of vessels or aircraft to and from another country. Customary international law recognizes blockades as an act of war because of the belligerent use of force even against third party nations in enforcing the blockade. Blockades as acts of war have been recognized as such in the Declaration of Paris of 1856 and the Declaration of London of 1909 that delineate the international rules of warfare."
The U.S. notified the United Nations Security Council late Friday of its plan to call a vote Monday on an aggressive new Trump administration resolution to impose new sanctions on North Korea.
The UK's Observer is reporting Saturday:
"The most striking language in the draft United Nations resolution seen by the Observer authorizes naval vessels of any UN member state to inspect North Korean ships suspected of carrying banned cargo and to use "all necessary measures to carry out such inspections". The implications of such a resolution would be far-reaching. Any attempt to board or divert a North Korean vessel could trigger an exchange of fire."
The draft resolution would also block the country's exports of textiles and ban employment of its guest workers by other countries, Bloomberg reports. The resolution also seeks to freeze North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's assets, according to the report.
Such a dramatic tightening of the economic vice is likely to meet resistance from China, which is anxious to avoid driving its embattled neighbor to the point of complete collapse; and Russia, which is promoting itself as a broker in the Korean standoff and has suggested that a new set of sanctions is "premature," according to the Observer.
"Up to now, the Chinese and the Russians have tried to keep on giving the US just enough to keep Trump playing the UN game," said Richard Gowan, an expert on the UN at the European Council for Foreign Relations. "The question is what happens with an extraordinarily hardline resolution and US pressure to do something quickly."
Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the UN, requested that the UN Security Council vote on the draft resolution on September 11th. To pass, a UN resolution would need nine votes in favor and no vetoes by any of the 15-member Security Council's permanent members, the United States, Britain, France, Russia, or China.
Professor Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, describes blockades under international and US law as: "belligerent measures taken by a nation (to) prevent passage of vessels or aircraft to and from another country. Customary international law recognizes blockades as an act of war because of the belligerent use of force even against third party nations in enforcing the blockade. Blockades as acts of war have been recognized as such in the Declaration of Paris of 1856 and the Declaration of London of 1909 that delineate the international rules of warfare."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.