Critics of Kushner are raising doubts about his explanation of his meetings with Russians during the 2016 campaign. In a prepared statement released ahead of his meeting with lawmakers Monday, President Donald Trump's son-in-law and senior advisor denied colluding with Russia during Trump's presidential campaign and suggested his lack of political experience was to blame for any meetings that were improper.
Following closed-door testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, Kushner appeared outside the White House and made the following statement:
Jared Kushner: "I did not collude with Russia, nor do I know of anyone else in the campaign who did so" https://t.co/UvMxn5zEYx— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) July 24, 2017
Kushner will speak to a House panel Tuesday; as with his Senate testimony, that questioning will not be under oath. In his written statement Kushner, whose official title is Director of Innovations and who Trump has put in charge of the White House's Middle East policy, characterized himself as inexperienced and overwhelmed during the campaign, resulting in his failure to disclose details about his contacts with Russian officials. "My experience was in business, not politics," prior to his work with Trump's campaign, he wrote at the beginning of the statement. He became involved in communications and foreign relations for the team, but notes, "All of these were tasks that I had never performed on a campaign previously."
He also said in his statement that his actions on the campaign "should be viewed through the lens of a fast-paced campaign with thousands of meetings and interactions."
Susan Hennessey of Lawfare spoke on CNN about Kushner's high-level post in the Trump White House versus his alleged inexperience.
"We've been told that Jared Kushner is going to solve Middle East peace, he is going to run the U.S. government's China policy, he is actually going to restructure the entire U.S. federal government— when it comes to the ability to fill out forms, keep track of meetings, exercise good judgment in whether or not he should be meeting with these types of officials during the transition period, it's all of a sudden 'aww shucks, I’m brand new to politics.' That's the message that comes through loud and clear, him saying I didn't know what I was doing. Anything that was untoward it was just an innocent mistake."
In his prepared statement, Kushner described his meetings with Russians including Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the campaign as brief and insignificant. He denied having two phone calls with Kislyak during the election, as reported by Reuters. Of a meeting with Russian banker Sergey Gorkov, who was said to have "a direct line to President Putin" in December 2016, Kushner wrote that the banker simply made general statements about "hopes for a better relationship" between Russia and the U.S. in the future and that no business interests were discussed.
Kushner also offered an explanation for his failure to disclose all of his contacts with Russian officials on his SF-86 form, used to apply for security clearance—pinning the responsibility on his assistant. He noted that the form was completed "amid the scramble of finalizing the unwinding of my involvement from my company, moving my family to Washington," and filing other paperwork, and that an aide mistakenly submitted the form before all of Kushner's contacts with Russians had been added.
On Twitter, journalists and Washington insiders raised doubts about Kushner's account of the events, and about his supposed naivete.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Get our best delivered to your inbox.
Former Obama aide Alyssa Mastromonaco questioned Kushner's version of the events regarding the SF-86 form.
Kush blames flaws on SF-86 on his asst? Form is nearly impossible for one to not do themselves, but then didn't proof it before submitted? https://t.co/1Kxmvy6BZ0— Alyssa Mastromonaco (@AlyssaMastro44) July 24, 2017
also re: Kush - for us in the WH+when we fucked up inexperience and "didn't know better" wld not have been OK. "I should have known" Own it— Alyssa Mastromonaco (@AlyssaMastro44) July 24, 2017
Benjamin Wittes of the Brookings Institution also disputed the possibility that an issue as important as relations with foreign officials could be disclosed incorrectly simply because of a clerical error.
Kushner's account of his SF-86 reporting is hard to credit fully, in my view. He blames his failure to report on a mistake by a subordinate. pic.twitter.com/KEVF6rKrXp— Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) July 24, 2017
Following Kushner's testimony Monday, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the meeting "raises far more questions than it answers."
"Kushner has repeatedly concealed information about his personal finances and meetings with foreign officials" Wyden said. "There should be no presumption that he is telling the whole truth in this statement...It is imperative that the public hear Jared Kushner testify in an open session of the Senate Intelligence Committee, under oath, and support his claims with full transparency in the form of emails, documents and financial records."