SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"The bills do nothing to improve or overhaul our outdated immigration system, but rather are designed to aid and abet Trump's radical agenda to kick out and keep out as many immigrants and refugees as possible," said America's Voice in a statement. (Photo: Fibonacci Blue/flickr/cc)
Following Trump's 'Xenophobic' Playbook, House Passes Two Anti-Immigrant Bills
"The true intent of these bills is to empower Trump's deportation force and anti-immigrant agenda."
Jun 29, 2017
"Trump's policy goals will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty."
--Frank Sharry, America's Voice
The U.S. House helped advance a central plank of President Donald Trump's agenda on Thursday by passing two immigration laws that were swiftly denounced by critics as "xenophobic" and "riddled with constitutional violations."
The Washington Post summarized the bills:
One bill, known as "Kate's Law," is named after Kate Steinle, the 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed in 2015 by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times. The bill enhances penalties for convicted and deported criminals who reenter the United States illegally.
The other bill, called the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, would bar some federal grants from so-called sanctuary cities that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement authorities and allow victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants to sue those cities.
"Kate's Law" passed with a vote of 257-167, and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act passed with a vote of 228-195.
While the Trump administration and House Republicans framed the measures as necessary for public safety, Democrats decried the bills as "draconian" and argued that they demonize those entering the country to reunite with their families.
Speaking on the House floor ahead of the vote, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) called the legislation "dangerous" and "anti-immigrant," and charged that the bills "perpetuate the fiction that immigrants are somehow inherently criminal. Nothing could be further from the truth."
In their statement condemning both measures, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) argued they would "undercut law enforcement's ability to keep communities safe, undermine Constitutional protections, and criminalize immigrants."
"American families deserve real solutions to our broken immigration system--that means fixing our immigration system, not playing politics by scapegoating immigrant communities and threatening the effectiveness of local law enforcement," said Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), the chair of the CHC.
Immigration rights groups and lawyers argued similarly that the two bills are little more than attempts to capitalize on the anti-immigrant hysteria spread by the president and his allies.
"The bills do nothing to improve or overhaul our outdated immigration system, but rather are designed to aid and abet Trump's radical agenda to kick out and keep out as many immigrants and refugees as possible," America's Voice said in a statement.
Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, added that the House bills embody "a xenophobic ultra-nationalism that pits Us vs. Them in a zero sum game."
"Trump's policy goals--deporting millions, banning refugees and Muslims, building walls and closing gates--will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty," Sharry concluded.
Lorella Praeli, director of immigration policy and campaigns at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argued that contrary to the claims of the Trump administration, "Kate's Law and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act will make our communities less safe by undermining the trust that law enforcement builds with its communities--citizen and immigrant alike."
"The true intent of these bills," Praeli concluded, "is to empower Trump's deportation force and anti-immigrant agenda."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"Trump's policy goals will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty."
--Frank Sharry, America's Voice
The U.S. House helped advance a central plank of President Donald Trump's agenda on Thursday by passing two immigration laws that were swiftly denounced by critics as "xenophobic" and "riddled with constitutional violations."
The Washington Post summarized the bills:
One bill, known as "Kate's Law," is named after Kate Steinle, the 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed in 2015 by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times. The bill enhances penalties for convicted and deported criminals who reenter the United States illegally.
The other bill, called the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, would bar some federal grants from so-called sanctuary cities that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement authorities and allow victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants to sue those cities.
"Kate's Law" passed with a vote of 257-167, and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act passed with a vote of 228-195.
While the Trump administration and House Republicans framed the measures as necessary for public safety, Democrats decried the bills as "draconian" and argued that they demonize those entering the country to reunite with their families.
Speaking on the House floor ahead of the vote, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) called the legislation "dangerous" and "anti-immigrant," and charged that the bills "perpetuate the fiction that immigrants are somehow inherently criminal. Nothing could be further from the truth."
In their statement condemning both measures, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) argued they would "undercut law enforcement's ability to keep communities safe, undermine Constitutional protections, and criminalize immigrants."
"American families deserve real solutions to our broken immigration system--that means fixing our immigration system, not playing politics by scapegoating immigrant communities and threatening the effectiveness of local law enforcement," said Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), the chair of the CHC.
Immigration rights groups and lawyers argued similarly that the two bills are little more than attempts to capitalize on the anti-immigrant hysteria spread by the president and his allies.
"The bills do nothing to improve or overhaul our outdated immigration system, but rather are designed to aid and abet Trump's radical agenda to kick out and keep out as many immigrants and refugees as possible," America's Voice said in a statement.
Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, added that the House bills embody "a xenophobic ultra-nationalism that pits Us vs. Them in a zero sum game."
"Trump's policy goals--deporting millions, banning refugees and Muslims, building walls and closing gates--will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty," Sharry concluded.
Lorella Praeli, director of immigration policy and campaigns at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argued that contrary to the claims of the Trump administration, "Kate's Law and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act will make our communities less safe by undermining the trust that law enforcement builds with its communities--citizen and immigrant alike."
"The true intent of these bills," Praeli concluded, "is to empower Trump's deportation force and anti-immigrant agenda."
"Trump's policy goals will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty."
--Frank Sharry, America's Voice
The U.S. House helped advance a central plank of President Donald Trump's agenda on Thursday by passing two immigration laws that were swiftly denounced by critics as "xenophobic" and "riddled with constitutional violations."
The Washington Post summarized the bills:
One bill, known as "Kate's Law," is named after Kate Steinle, the 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed in 2015 by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times. The bill enhances penalties for convicted and deported criminals who reenter the United States illegally.
The other bill, called the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, would bar some federal grants from so-called sanctuary cities that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement authorities and allow victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants to sue those cities.
"Kate's Law" passed with a vote of 257-167, and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act passed with a vote of 228-195.
While the Trump administration and House Republicans framed the measures as necessary for public safety, Democrats decried the bills as "draconian" and argued that they demonize those entering the country to reunite with their families.
Speaking on the House floor ahead of the vote, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) called the legislation "dangerous" and "anti-immigrant," and charged that the bills "perpetuate the fiction that immigrants are somehow inherently criminal. Nothing could be further from the truth."
In their statement condemning both measures, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) argued they would "undercut law enforcement's ability to keep communities safe, undermine Constitutional protections, and criminalize immigrants."
"American families deserve real solutions to our broken immigration system--that means fixing our immigration system, not playing politics by scapegoating immigrant communities and threatening the effectiveness of local law enforcement," said Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), the chair of the CHC.
Immigration rights groups and lawyers argued similarly that the two bills are little more than attempts to capitalize on the anti-immigrant hysteria spread by the president and his allies.
"The bills do nothing to improve or overhaul our outdated immigration system, but rather are designed to aid and abet Trump's radical agenda to kick out and keep out as many immigrants and refugees as possible," America's Voice said in a statement.
Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, added that the House bills embody "a xenophobic ultra-nationalism that pits Us vs. Them in a zero sum game."
"Trump's policy goals--deporting millions, banning refugees and Muslims, building walls and closing gates--will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty," Sharry concluded.
Lorella Praeli, director of immigration policy and campaigns at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argued that contrary to the claims of the Trump administration, "Kate's Law and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act will make our communities less safe by undermining the trust that law enforcement builds with its communities--citizen and immigrant alike."
"The true intent of these bills," Praeli concluded, "is to empower Trump's deportation force and anti-immigrant agenda."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.