SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"The bills do nothing to improve or overhaul our outdated immigration system, but rather are designed to aid and abet Trump's radical agenda to kick out and keep out as many immigrants and refugees as possible," said America's Voice in a statement. (Photo: Fibonacci Blue/flickr/cc)
Following Trump's 'Xenophobic' Playbook, House Passes Two Anti-Immigrant Bills
"The true intent of these bills is to empower Trump's deportation force and anti-immigrant agenda."
Jun 29, 2017
"Trump's policy goals will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty."
--Frank Sharry, America's Voice
The U.S. House helped advance a central plank of President Donald Trump's agenda on Thursday by passing two immigration laws that were swiftly denounced by critics as "xenophobic" and "riddled with constitutional violations."
The Washington Post summarized the bills:
One bill, known as "Kate's Law," is named after Kate Steinle, the 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed in 2015 by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times. The bill enhances penalties for convicted and deported criminals who reenter the United States illegally.
The other bill, called the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, would bar some federal grants from so-called sanctuary cities that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement authorities and allow victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants to sue those cities.
"Kate's Law" passed with a vote of 257-167, and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act passed with a vote of 228-195.
While the Trump administration and House Republicans framed the measures as necessary for public safety, Democrats decried the bills as "draconian" and argued that they demonize those entering the country to reunite with their families.
Speaking on the House floor ahead of the vote, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) called the legislation "dangerous" and "anti-immigrant," and charged that the bills "perpetuate the fiction that immigrants are somehow inherently criminal. Nothing could be further from the truth."
In their statement condemning both measures, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) argued they would "undercut law enforcement's ability to keep communities safe, undermine Constitutional protections, and criminalize immigrants."
"American families deserve real solutions to our broken immigration system--that means fixing our immigration system, not playing politics by scapegoating immigrant communities and threatening the effectiveness of local law enforcement," said Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), the chair of the CHC.
Immigration rights groups and lawyers argued similarly that the two bills are little more than attempts to capitalize on the anti-immigrant hysteria spread by the president and his allies.
"The bills do nothing to improve or overhaul our outdated immigration system, but rather are designed to aid and abet Trump's radical agenda to kick out and keep out as many immigrants and refugees as possible," America's Voice said in a statement.
Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, added that the House bills embody "a xenophobic ultra-nationalism that pits Us vs. Them in a zero sum game."
"Trump's policy goals--deporting millions, banning refugees and Muslims, building walls and closing gates--will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty," Sharry concluded.
Lorella Praeli, director of immigration policy and campaigns at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argued that contrary to the claims of the Trump administration, "Kate's Law and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act will make our communities less safe by undermining the trust that law enforcement builds with its communities--citizen and immigrant alike."
"The true intent of these bills," Praeli concluded, "is to empower Trump's deportation force and anti-immigrant agenda."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"Trump's policy goals will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty."
--Frank Sharry, America's Voice
The U.S. House helped advance a central plank of President Donald Trump's agenda on Thursday by passing two immigration laws that were swiftly denounced by critics as "xenophobic" and "riddled with constitutional violations."
The Washington Post summarized the bills:
One bill, known as "Kate's Law," is named after Kate Steinle, the 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed in 2015 by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times. The bill enhances penalties for convicted and deported criminals who reenter the United States illegally.
The other bill, called the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, would bar some federal grants from so-called sanctuary cities that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement authorities and allow victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants to sue those cities.
"Kate's Law" passed with a vote of 257-167, and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act passed with a vote of 228-195.
While the Trump administration and House Republicans framed the measures as necessary for public safety, Democrats decried the bills as "draconian" and argued that they demonize those entering the country to reunite with their families.
Speaking on the House floor ahead of the vote, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) called the legislation "dangerous" and "anti-immigrant," and charged that the bills "perpetuate the fiction that immigrants are somehow inherently criminal. Nothing could be further from the truth."
In their statement condemning both measures, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) argued they would "undercut law enforcement's ability to keep communities safe, undermine Constitutional protections, and criminalize immigrants."
"American families deserve real solutions to our broken immigration system--that means fixing our immigration system, not playing politics by scapegoating immigrant communities and threatening the effectiveness of local law enforcement," said Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), the chair of the CHC.
Immigration rights groups and lawyers argued similarly that the two bills are little more than attempts to capitalize on the anti-immigrant hysteria spread by the president and his allies.
"The bills do nothing to improve or overhaul our outdated immigration system, but rather are designed to aid and abet Trump's radical agenda to kick out and keep out as many immigrants and refugees as possible," America's Voice said in a statement.
Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, added that the House bills embody "a xenophobic ultra-nationalism that pits Us vs. Them in a zero sum game."
"Trump's policy goals--deporting millions, banning refugees and Muslims, building walls and closing gates--will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty," Sharry concluded.
Lorella Praeli, director of immigration policy and campaigns at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argued that contrary to the claims of the Trump administration, "Kate's Law and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act will make our communities less safe by undermining the trust that law enforcement builds with its communities--citizen and immigrant alike."
"The true intent of these bills," Praeli concluded, "is to empower Trump's deportation force and anti-immigrant agenda."
"Trump's policy goals will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty."
--Frank Sharry, America's Voice
The U.S. House helped advance a central plank of President Donald Trump's agenda on Thursday by passing two immigration laws that were swiftly denounced by critics as "xenophobic" and "riddled with constitutional violations."
The Washington Post summarized the bills:
One bill, known as "Kate's Law," is named after Kate Steinle, the 32-year-old woman who was shot and killed in 2015 by an illegal immigrant who had been deported five times. The bill enhances penalties for convicted and deported criminals who reenter the United States illegally.
The other bill, called the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act, would bar some federal grants from so-called sanctuary cities that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement authorities and allow victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants to sue those cities.
"Kate's Law" passed with a vote of 257-167, and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act passed with a vote of 228-195.
While the Trump administration and House Republicans framed the measures as necessary for public safety, Democrats decried the bills as "draconian" and argued that they demonize those entering the country to reunite with their families.
Speaking on the House floor ahead of the vote, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) called the legislation "dangerous" and "anti-immigrant," and charged that the bills "perpetuate the fiction that immigrants are somehow inherently criminal. Nothing could be further from the truth."
In their statement condemning both measures, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) argued they would "undercut law enforcement's ability to keep communities safe, undermine Constitutional protections, and criminalize immigrants."
"American families deserve real solutions to our broken immigration system--that means fixing our immigration system, not playing politics by scapegoating immigrant communities and threatening the effectiveness of local law enforcement," said Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM), the chair of the CHC.
Immigration rights groups and lawyers argued similarly that the two bills are little more than attempts to capitalize on the anti-immigrant hysteria spread by the president and his allies.
"The bills do nothing to improve or overhaul our outdated immigration system, but rather are designed to aid and abet Trump's radical agenda to kick out and keep out as many immigrants and refugees as possible," America's Voice said in a statement.
Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, added that the House bills embody "a xenophobic ultra-nationalism that pits Us vs. Them in a zero sum game."
"Trump's policy goals--deporting millions, banning refugees and Muslims, building walls and closing gates--will, if fully implemented, take a wrecking ball to the Statue of Liberty," Sharry concluded.
Lorella Praeli, director of immigration policy and campaigns at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argued that contrary to the claims of the Trump administration, "Kate's Law and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act will make our communities less safe by undermining the trust that law enforcement builds with its communities--citizen and immigrant alike."
"The true intent of these bills," Praeli concluded, "is to empower Trump's deportation force and anti-immigrant agenda."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy