SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
What's In the Transcript? There's a Way to Find Out What Trump Told Russia
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Tuesday morning demanded the White House release an "unedited transcript" of Trump's meeting with Russians
May 16, 2017
Among the revelations in Monday evening's bombshell Washington Post report on President Donald Trump disclosing classified information to Russian diplomats is the fact that one U.S. counterterrorism official "called for the problematic portion of Trump's discussion to be stricken from internal memos and for the full transcript to be limited to a small circle of recipients, efforts to prevent sensitive details from being disseminated further or leaked."
Now, amid outrage, calls are growing for that transcript to be released--if not to the public at-large, than at least "to Congress for investigative purposes," as National Memo editor-in-chief Joe Conason wrote Tuesday.
"[T]he House and Senate intelligence committees should request--or if necessary, subpoena--the transcripts of Trump's meeting with the Russians, to see who is telling the truth," Conason insisted. "To paraphrase Trump, that may be the only way to 'find out what the hell is going on'."
In turn, he continued, it may be the only way to see if there are grounds for impeachment. (Notably, U.S. press was not allowed into the meeting between Trump and the Russian officials.)
Trump admitted Tuesday morning that he did share "facts" about a threat from the Islamic State (ISIS) during a meeting last week with the Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, and the Russian ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak. The president declared in a tweet that he had an "absolute right" to do so.
This goes against denials by top administration officials, and comes on the heels of Trump himself saying last week that it was nigh impossible to expect accuracy from his surrogates.
The cumulative effect, one Republican consultant told Politico, is that the administration's "credibility is completely shattered."
"They've engaged in serial lying to the American people on issues big and small--beginning with the crowd size photos," said Steve Schmidt, former campaign manager for John McCain. "It's unprecedented for an administration, from the top on down, to embrace a strategy of deception and lying."
Added Stu Loeser, a longtime press secretary to former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg: "If you've blown your credibility on crowd size or semantics, people say: What else are they going to lie about?"
That's why, as Conason and others now argue, we must turn to the full transcript.
So far, the only explicit calls for releasing the transcript have come from Democrats. But with Republicans increasingly demanding answers from the administration, could it be the nail in Trump's coffin?
After all, "[t]his is not a partisan issue," said Conason. "Only Congress, Republicans and Democrats acting together, can protect the nation from this incompetent, venal, and dangerous executive. They can no longer ignore the threat he poses to our security."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Among the revelations in Monday evening's bombshell Washington Post report on President Donald Trump disclosing classified information to Russian diplomats is the fact that one U.S. counterterrorism official "called for the problematic portion of Trump's discussion to be stricken from internal memos and for the full transcript to be limited to a small circle of recipients, efforts to prevent sensitive details from being disseminated further or leaked."
Now, amid outrage, calls are growing for that transcript to be released--if not to the public at-large, than at least "to Congress for investigative purposes," as National Memo editor-in-chief Joe Conason wrote Tuesday.
"[T]he House and Senate intelligence committees should request--or if necessary, subpoena--the transcripts of Trump's meeting with the Russians, to see who is telling the truth," Conason insisted. "To paraphrase Trump, that may be the only way to 'find out what the hell is going on'."
In turn, he continued, it may be the only way to see if there are grounds for impeachment. (Notably, U.S. press was not allowed into the meeting between Trump and the Russian officials.)
Trump admitted Tuesday morning that he did share "facts" about a threat from the Islamic State (ISIS) during a meeting last week with the Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, and the Russian ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak. The president declared in a tweet that he had an "absolute right" to do so.
This goes against denials by top administration officials, and comes on the heels of Trump himself saying last week that it was nigh impossible to expect accuracy from his surrogates.
The cumulative effect, one Republican consultant told Politico, is that the administration's "credibility is completely shattered."
"They've engaged in serial lying to the American people on issues big and small--beginning with the crowd size photos," said Steve Schmidt, former campaign manager for John McCain. "It's unprecedented for an administration, from the top on down, to embrace a strategy of deception and lying."
Added Stu Loeser, a longtime press secretary to former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg: "If you've blown your credibility on crowd size or semantics, people say: What else are they going to lie about?"
That's why, as Conason and others now argue, we must turn to the full transcript.
So far, the only explicit calls for releasing the transcript have come from Democrats. But with Republicans increasingly demanding answers from the administration, could it be the nail in Trump's coffin?
After all, "[t]his is not a partisan issue," said Conason. "Only Congress, Republicans and Democrats acting together, can protect the nation from this incompetent, venal, and dangerous executive. They can no longer ignore the threat he poses to our security."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Among the revelations in Monday evening's bombshell Washington Post report on President Donald Trump disclosing classified information to Russian diplomats is the fact that one U.S. counterterrorism official "called for the problematic portion of Trump's discussion to be stricken from internal memos and for the full transcript to be limited to a small circle of recipients, efforts to prevent sensitive details from being disseminated further or leaked."
Now, amid outrage, calls are growing for that transcript to be released--if not to the public at-large, than at least "to Congress for investigative purposes," as National Memo editor-in-chief Joe Conason wrote Tuesday.
"[T]he House and Senate intelligence committees should request--or if necessary, subpoena--the transcripts of Trump's meeting with the Russians, to see who is telling the truth," Conason insisted. "To paraphrase Trump, that may be the only way to 'find out what the hell is going on'."
In turn, he continued, it may be the only way to see if there are grounds for impeachment. (Notably, U.S. press was not allowed into the meeting between Trump and the Russian officials.)
Trump admitted Tuesday morning that he did share "facts" about a threat from the Islamic State (ISIS) during a meeting last week with the Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, and the Russian ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak. The president declared in a tweet that he had an "absolute right" to do so.
This goes against denials by top administration officials, and comes on the heels of Trump himself saying last week that it was nigh impossible to expect accuracy from his surrogates.
The cumulative effect, one Republican consultant told Politico, is that the administration's "credibility is completely shattered."
"They've engaged in serial lying to the American people on issues big and small--beginning with the crowd size photos," said Steve Schmidt, former campaign manager for John McCain. "It's unprecedented for an administration, from the top on down, to embrace a strategy of deception and lying."
Added Stu Loeser, a longtime press secretary to former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg: "If you've blown your credibility on crowd size or semantics, people say: What else are they going to lie about?"
That's why, as Conason and others now argue, we must turn to the full transcript.
So far, the only explicit calls for releasing the transcript have come from Democrats. But with Republicans increasingly demanding answers from the administration, could it be the nail in Trump's coffin?
After all, "[t]his is not a partisan issue," said Conason. "Only Congress, Republicans and Democrats acting together, can protect the nation from this incompetent, venal, and dangerous executive. They can no longer ignore the threat he poses to our security."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.