SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sessions May Revive Harsh Penalties for Low-Level Drug Charges
If new changes are implemented, it will mark another major pivot by Trump administration to reverse recent efforts to address mass incarceration crisis
May 09, 2017
Attorney General Jeff Sessions is considering scrapping Obama-era rules that banned harsh punishments for low-level drug crimes and could direct prosecutors to resume charging severe penalties, according to U.S. officials who spoke to the Washington Post on Tuesday.
The change would overturn a 2013 memo by former Attorney General Eric Holder that instructed prosecutors to avoid issuing charges that would trigger mandatory minimum sentences for low-level defendants.
If the new instructions are implemented, it will mark another major pivot by the Trump administration away from recent federal efforts to address mass incarceration, which is now widely seen as ineffective and harmful.
It's also less than surprising.
Prior to Sessions' confirmation in February, the Brennan Center for Justice released two analyses warning that the former Alabama senator could upend all the progress the Justice Department has made in addressing everything from prison reform to voting rights.
"Sessions appears to subscribe to outdated ideas about criminal justice policy that conservatives, progressives, and law enforcement leaders agree do not help reduce crime," Ames C. Grawert, counsel in the Brennan Center's Justice Program, said at the time.
As prominent journalist Wesley Lowery tweeted Tuesday in response to the news, "Jeff Sessions seems determined to disprove a decade of 'GOP really the leaders on criminal justice reform' pieces."
Indeed, while serving as district attorney from 1981-1993, 40 percent of Sessions' convictions were for drug charges, double the rate of other state prosecutors. He is also known to be against marijuana legalization, an issue that has gained public support in recent years, and has a history of favoring "tough on crime" policies, including blocking limits on the use of juvenile solitary confinement.
Moreover, many of his opponents noted before his confirmation that Sessions was rejected for a federal judgeship in 1986 on the grounds that he was "too racist."
That detail was not lost on observers who responded to Tuesday's news. Holder's former spokesperson Matthew Miller added to the Post that the Trump administration "couldn't be making it more clear who it cares about and who it doesn't."
"If you are addicted to opiates, you'll get White House attention and increased treatment options," Miller said. "If you get picked up with crack in your pocket, you'll get jail time and a mandatory minimum."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions is considering scrapping Obama-era rules that banned harsh punishments for low-level drug crimes and could direct prosecutors to resume charging severe penalties, according to U.S. officials who spoke to the Washington Post on Tuesday.
The change would overturn a 2013 memo by former Attorney General Eric Holder that instructed prosecutors to avoid issuing charges that would trigger mandatory minimum sentences for low-level defendants.
If the new instructions are implemented, it will mark another major pivot by the Trump administration away from recent federal efforts to address mass incarceration, which is now widely seen as ineffective and harmful.
It's also less than surprising.
Prior to Sessions' confirmation in February, the Brennan Center for Justice released two analyses warning that the former Alabama senator could upend all the progress the Justice Department has made in addressing everything from prison reform to voting rights.
"Sessions appears to subscribe to outdated ideas about criminal justice policy that conservatives, progressives, and law enforcement leaders agree do not help reduce crime," Ames C. Grawert, counsel in the Brennan Center's Justice Program, said at the time.
As prominent journalist Wesley Lowery tweeted Tuesday in response to the news, "Jeff Sessions seems determined to disprove a decade of 'GOP really the leaders on criminal justice reform' pieces."
Indeed, while serving as district attorney from 1981-1993, 40 percent of Sessions' convictions were for drug charges, double the rate of other state prosecutors. He is also known to be against marijuana legalization, an issue that has gained public support in recent years, and has a history of favoring "tough on crime" policies, including blocking limits on the use of juvenile solitary confinement.
Moreover, many of his opponents noted before his confirmation that Sessions was rejected for a federal judgeship in 1986 on the grounds that he was "too racist."
That detail was not lost on observers who responded to Tuesday's news. Holder's former spokesperson Matthew Miller added to the Post that the Trump administration "couldn't be making it more clear who it cares about and who it doesn't."
"If you are addicted to opiates, you'll get White House attention and increased treatment options," Miller said. "If you get picked up with crack in your pocket, you'll get jail time and a mandatory minimum."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions is considering scrapping Obama-era rules that banned harsh punishments for low-level drug crimes and could direct prosecutors to resume charging severe penalties, according to U.S. officials who spoke to the Washington Post on Tuesday.
The change would overturn a 2013 memo by former Attorney General Eric Holder that instructed prosecutors to avoid issuing charges that would trigger mandatory minimum sentences for low-level defendants.
If the new instructions are implemented, it will mark another major pivot by the Trump administration away from recent federal efforts to address mass incarceration, which is now widely seen as ineffective and harmful.
It's also less than surprising.
Prior to Sessions' confirmation in February, the Brennan Center for Justice released two analyses warning that the former Alabama senator could upend all the progress the Justice Department has made in addressing everything from prison reform to voting rights.
"Sessions appears to subscribe to outdated ideas about criminal justice policy that conservatives, progressives, and law enforcement leaders agree do not help reduce crime," Ames C. Grawert, counsel in the Brennan Center's Justice Program, said at the time.
As prominent journalist Wesley Lowery tweeted Tuesday in response to the news, "Jeff Sessions seems determined to disprove a decade of 'GOP really the leaders on criminal justice reform' pieces."
Indeed, while serving as district attorney from 1981-1993, 40 percent of Sessions' convictions were for drug charges, double the rate of other state prosecutors. He is also known to be against marijuana legalization, an issue that has gained public support in recent years, and has a history of favoring "tough on crime" policies, including blocking limits on the use of juvenile solitary confinement.
Moreover, many of his opponents noted before his confirmation that Sessions was rejected for a federal judgeship in 1986 on the grounds that he was "too racist."
That detail was not lost on observers who responded to Tuesday's news. Holder's former spokesperson Matthew Miller added to the Post that the Trump administration "couldn't be making it more clear who it cares about and who it doesn't."
"If you are addicted to opiates, you'll get White House attention and increased treatment options," Miller said. "If you get picked up with crack in your pocket, you'll get jail time and a mandatory minimum."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy