May 08, 2017
This story may be updated.
Minutes after a reporter asked White House press secretary Sean Spicer why President Donald Trump's campaign website still broadcast his call for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States," that page went blank, according to reports on Monday afternoon.
\u201cMinutes after we asked the WH why the President's campaign website still calls for a Muslim ban, it appears the statement was deleted https://t.co/BBX9oiIczx\u201d— Cecilia Vega (@Cecilia Vega) 1494267384
\u201cMoments after Spicer was asked about this Trump campaign page calling for a Muslim ban, it went blank. But Wayback Machine still has it\u201d— Robert Maguire (@Robert Maguire) 1494268608
Trump's call for a Muslim ban figures prominently in arguments against his second executive order blocking entry to the United States for people from six majority-Muslim countries. Opponents like Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)'s Immigrants' Rights Project, say statements like that one "made absolutely clear that [Trump] wanted to target Muslims."
Lawyers for both sides argued their cases "en banc" on Monday afternoon, before a panel of all active and eligible judges of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Judges in Maryland and Hawaii had previously halted implementation of the order, specifically citing Trump's past statements while he was on the campaign trail. Monday's hearing is over the Maryland ruling; the Trump administration's challenge to the Hawaii decision will be heard by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle next Monday.
"In the Maryland case," the Los Angeles Timeswrote in March, "U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang's decision quoted Trump's campaign vows to suspend Muslim immigration as evidence that 'the national security purpose is not the primary purpose of the travel ban'." Judge Derrick K. Watson, in Hawaii, quoted Trump's "total and complete shutdown" press release in his decision, saying there was "nothing 'veiled'" about it.
Meanwhile, Fourth Circuit judges also brought up Trump's campaign statements on Monday, according to reports from the hearing:
\u201c4th Circuit's Judge King points out that Trump "never repudiated" his campaign trail call for a Muslim ban after taking office.\u201d— Alice Miranda Ollstein (@Alice Miranda Ollstein) 1494270400
\u201cJudge brings up the Muslim Ban press release on Trump's campaign site. I feel like it getting zeroed out today will do more harm than good.\u201d— Parker Higgins (@Parker Higgins) 1494269978
\u201cTrump admin argues in court re Muslim ban that POTUS campaign statements shouldnt matter. But Muslim ban was on his website until today\u201d— Dafna Linzer (@Dafna Linzer) 1494269160
\u201cCourt: Trump has never repudiated what he said about Muslim Ban. It is STILL on his website!\u201d— Jackie Vimo (@Jackie Vimo) 1494270297
\u201cKey issues in #MuslimBan hearing: should we consider only text of order, or do we determine President's intent from his campaign statements?\u201d— Jackie Vimo (@Jackie Vimo) 1494273594
Advocacy groups were expected to hold a press conference following the hearing.
The courtroom in Richmond, Virginia wasn't the only place where Trump's Muslim Ban 2.0 was litigated on Monday. Republican Sens. John Cornyn and Ted Cruz, both of Texas, also grilled former acting Attorney General Sally Yates about her refusal to defend the order.
Watch below:
\u201c.@JohnCornyn attacks Yates' credentials as a public servant for failing to defend Trump's Muslim ban. \n\nYates CLEANS HIS CLOCK! Take a look:\u201d— igorvolsky (@igorvolsky) 1494273442
\u201cBOOM! Yates wouldn't defend Muslim ban because arguments "have to be based on truth. We're not just a law firm, we're the DOJ" #YatesHearing\u201d— Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher) 1494273395
\u201cOH MY GOD Sally Yates just SCHOOLED Ted Cruz on the Muslim ban. KA-BOOOM! #YatesHearing\u201d— Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher) 1494274227
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
This story may be updated.
Minutes after a reporter asked White House press secretary Sean Spicer why President Donald Trump's campaign website still broadcast his call for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States," that page went blank, according to reports on Monday afternoon.
\u201cMinutes after we asked the WH why the President's campaign website still calls for a Muslim ban, it appears the statement was deleted https://t.co/BBX9oiIczx\u201d— Cecilia Vega (@Cecilia Vega) 1494267384
\u201cMoments after Spicer was asked about this Trump campaign page calling for a Muslim ban, it went blank. But Wayback Machine still has it\u201d— Robert Maguire (@Robert Maguire) 1494268608
Trump's call for a Muslim ban figures prominently in arguments against his second executive order blocking entry to the United States for people from six majority-Muslim countries. Opponents like Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)'s Immigrants' Rights Project, say statements like that one "made absolutely clear that [Trump] wanted to target Muslims."
Lawyers for both sides argued their cases "en banc" on Monday afternoon, before a panel of all active and eligible judges of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Judges in Maryland and Hawaii had previously halted implementation of the order, specifically citing Trump's past statements while he was on the campaign trail. Monday's hearing is over the Maryland ruling; the Trump administration's challenge to the Hawaii decision will be heard by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle next Monday.
"In the Maryland case," the Los Angeles Timeswrote in March, "U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang's decision quoted Trump's campaign vows to suspend Muslim immigration as evidence that 'the national security purpose is not the primary purpose of the travel ban'." Judge Derrick K. Watson, in Hawaii, quoted Trump's "total and complete shutdown" press release in his decision, saying there was "nothing 'veiled'" about it.
Meanwhile, Fourth Circuit judges also brought up Trump's campaign statements on Monday, according to reports from the hearing:
\u201c4th Circuit's Judge King points out that Trump "never repudiated" his campaign trail call for a Muslim ban after taking office.\u201d— Alice Miranda Ollstein (@Alice Miranda Ollstein) 1494270400
\u201cJudge brings up the Muslim Ban press release on Trump's campaign site. I feel like it getting zeroed out today will do more harm than good.\u201d— Parker Higgins (@Parker Higgins) 1494269978
\u201cTrump admin argues in court re Muslim ban that POTUS campaign statements shouldnt matter. But Muslim ban was on his website until today\u201d— Dafna Linzer (@Dafna Linzer) 1494269160
\u201cCourt: Trump has never repudiated what he said about Muslim Ban. It is STILL on his website!\u201d— Jackie Vimo (@Jackie Vimo) 1494270297
\u201cKey issues in #MuslimBan hearing: should we consider only text of order, or do we determine President's intent from his campaign statements?\u201d— Jackie Vimo (@Jackie Vimo) 1494273594
Advocacy groups were expected to hold a press conference following the hearing.
The courtroom in Richmond, Virginia wasn't the only place where Trump's Muslim Ban 2.0 was litigated on Monday. Republican Sens. John Cornyn and Ted Cruz, both of Texas, also grilled former acting Attorney General Sally Yates about her refusal to defend the order.
Watch below:
\u201c.@JohnCornyn attacks Yates' credentials as a public servant for failing to defend Trump's Muslim ban. \n\nYates CLEANS HIS CLOCK! Take a look:\u201d— igorvolsky (@igorvolsky) 1494273442
\u201cBOOM! Yates wouldn't defend Muslim ban because arguments "have to be based on truth. We're not just a law firm, we're the DOJ" #YatesHearing\u201d— Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher) 1494273395
\u201cOH MY GOD Sally Yates just SCHOOLED Ted Cruz on the Muslim ban. KA-BOOOM! #YatesHearing\u201d— Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher) 1494274227
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
This story may be updated.
Minutes after a reporter asked White House press secretary Sean Spicer why President Donald Trump's campaign website still broadcast his call for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States," that page went blank, according to reports on Monday afternoon.
\u201cMinutes after we asked the WH why the President's campaign website still calls for a Muslim ban, it appears the statement was deleted https://t.co/BBX9oiIczx\u201d— Cecilia Vega (@Cecilia Vega) 1494267384
\u201cMoments after Spicer was asked about this Trump campaign page calling for a Muslim ban, it went blank. But Wayback Machine still has it\u201d— Robert Maguire (@Robert Maguire) 1494268608
Trump's call for a Muslim ban figures prominently in arguments against his second executive order blocking entry to the United States for people from six majority-Muslim countries. Opponents like Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)'s Immigrants' Rights Project, say statements like that one "made absolutely clear that [Trump] wanted to target Muslims."
Lawyers for both sides argued their cases "en banc" on Monday afternoon, before a panel of all active and eligible judges of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Judges in Maryland and Hawaii had previously halted implementation of the order, specifically citing Trump's past statements while he was on the campaign trail. Monday's hearing is over the Maryland ruling; the Trump administration's challenge to the Hawaii decision will be heard by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle next Monday.
"In the Maryland case," the Los Angeles Timeswrote in March, "U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang's decision quoted Trump's campaign vows to suspend Muslim immigration as evidence that 'the national security purpose is not the primary purpose of the travel ban'." Judge Derrick K. Watson, in Hawaii, quoted Trump's "total and complete shutdown" press release in his decision, saying there was "nothing 'veiled'" about it.
Meanwhile, Fourth Circuit judges also brought up Trump's campaign statements on Monday, according to reports from the hearing:
\u201c4th Circuit's Judge King points out that Trump "never repudiated" his campaign trail call for a Muslim ban after taking office.\u201d— Alice Miranda Ollstein (@Alice Miranda Ollstein) 1494270400
\u201cJudge brings up the Muslim Ban press release on Trump's campaign site. I feel like it getting zeroed out today will do more harm than good.\u201d— Parker Higgins (@Parker Higgins) 1494269978
\u201cTrump admin argues in court re Muslim ban that POTUS campaign statements shouldnt matter. But Muslim ban was on his website until today\u201d— Dafna Linzer (@Dafna Linzer) 1494269160
\u201cCourt: Trump has never repudiated what he said about Muslim Ban. It is STILL on his website!\u201d— Jackie Vimo (@Jackie Vimo) 1494270297
\u201cKey issues in #MuslimBan hearing: should we consider only text of order, or do we determine President's intent from his campaign statements?\u201d— Jackie Vimo (@Jackie Vimo) 1494273594
Advocacy groups were expected to hold a press conference following the hearing.
The courtroom in Richmond, Virginia wasn't the only place where Trump's Muslim Ban 2.0 was litigated on Monday. Republican Sens. John Cornyn and Ted Cruz, both of Texas, also grilled former acting Attorney General Sally Yates about her refusal to defend the order.
Watch below:
\u201c.@JohnCornyn attacks Yates' credentials as a public servant for failing to defend Trump's Muslim ban. \n\nYates CLEANS HIS CLOCK! Take a look:\u201d— igorvolsky (@igorvolsky) 1494273442
\u201cBOOM! Yates wouldn't defend Muslim ban because arguments "have to be based on truth. We're not just a law firm, we're the DOJ" #YatesHearing\u201d— Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher) 1494273395
\u201cOH MY GOD Sally Yates just SCHOOLED Ted Cruz on the Muslim ban. KA-BOOOM! #YatesHearing\u201d— Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher) 1494274227
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.