SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A troubling pop-up message appeared on the EPA's Open Data site over the weekend. It was later replaced by a reassurance that the data would remain available after Friday. (Photo: @Revkin/Twitter)
Save the Data: Is EPA Citizen-Science Portal in Danger Under Trump?
Site in question contains a 'data warehouse' covering air, water, and ground pollution data, plus much more
Apr 24, 2017
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is assuring the public that a valuable citizen-linked and searchable portal that stores information on climate change, public health, and pollution will still be available after Friday, April 28.
Fresh off Saturday's global March for Science, researchers and scientists sounded the alarm on Sunday and Monday, as word spread that President Donald Trump's administration was preparing to shut down the EPA's Open Data web service by the end of the week.
Journalists and science advocates immediately launched a call to "scrape" records from the service, after open-data scientist and tech CEO Bernadette Hyland wrote on Medium that her company had received word the site would go dark at 12:00pm on Friday in the event of a government shutdown.
In her post on Sunday, Hyland noted that the service "includes detailed toxic chemical information, a 30-year history of toxic chemical releases reported by industrial and federal facilities, collected and curated by the EPA's flagship Toxics Release Inventory Program." That program, according to the EPA, "supports informed decision-making by communities, government agencies, companies, and others."
Author and software engineer David Wood further explained on Twitter that the site "contains a data warehouse of [seven] EPA databases and represents air, water, ground pollution data, [and] import/exports of toxic chemicals."
Scrapping such records, Andrew Griffin wrote at The Independent, would "mean that citizens will no longer be able to access information on their environment and climate, keeping them from researching potentially fatal changes to their area."
The public outrage was palpable:
WE PAID FOR THAT DATA. IT'S OURS. https://t.co/vrpPd04WmC
-- Lila Ralston (@epicdemiologist) April 24, 2017
\u201cAn election can\u2019t make data go dark. Data from public funding must remain public. #SaveTheData https://t.co/tlgofnieUA\u201d— Mark Johnson (@Mark Johnson) 1493013561
\u201cWill @HouseScience @LamarSmithTX21 ask @EPAScottPruitt to keep @EPA #OpenData site? Killing it clashes with push for transparency/cred? https://t.co/rQiVb0Q7PD\u201d— Andrew Revkin \ud83c\udf0e \u270d\ud83c\udffc \ud83e\ude95 \u262e\ufe0f (@Andrew Revkin \ud83c\udf0e \u270d\ud83c\udffc \ud83e\ude95 \u262e\ufe0f) 1493036671
The news was especially pertinent as it came in the wake of Earth Day, when tens of thousands across the globe marched against the anti-science Trump administration and in support of what Greenpeace's Tim Donaghy called "the values of the scientific method--openness, curiosity, collaboration, and respect for evidence."
But on Monday, Alex Howard of the Sunlight Foundation noted online that should the service go offline, it may not be permanent. "Remember," he wrote, "when the U.S. government 'shut down' in March 2014, a lot of government websites & data went offline."
The Hill's Timothy Cama confirmed that an EPA spokesperson told him the site "isn't shutting down, just won't get updated during a gov't shutdown" and the official EPA Twitter account on Monday posted:
\u201cRumors about the website https://t.co/LrKulKdA6t are wrong. It's open, working & not going anywhere. This website & the EPA belong to you.\u201d— U.S. EPA (@U.S. EPA) 1493042525
A new pop-up message also appeared on the Open Data site late Monday morning, pledging the data would still be available after Friday:
But given the Trump administration's record on transparency and openness--not to mention science and the environment--some maintained that "saving the data" surely couldn't hurt.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is assuring the public that a valuable citizen-linked and searchable portal that stores information on climate change, public health, and pollution will still be available after Friday, April 28.
Fresh off Saturday's global March for Science, researchers and scientists sounded the alarm on Sunday and Monday, as word spread that President Donald Trump's administration was preparing to shut down the EPA's Open Data web service by the end of the week.
Journalists and science advocates immediately launched a call to "scrape" records from the service, after open-data scientist and tech CEO Bernadette Hyland wrote on Medium that her company had received word the site would go dark at 12:00pm on Friday in the event of a government shutdown.
In her post on Sunday, Hyland noted that the service "includes detailed toxic chemical information, a 30-year history of toxic chemical releases reported by industrial and federal facilities, collected and curated by the EPA's flagship Toxics Release Inventory Program." That program, according to the EPA, "supports informed decision-making by communities, government agencies, companies, and others."
Author and software engineer David Wood further explained on Twitter that the site "contains a data warehouse of [seven] EPA databases and represents air, water, ground pollution data, [and] import/exports of toxic chemicals."
Scrapping such records, Andrew Griffin wrote at The Independent, would "mean that citizens will no longer be able to access information on their environment and climate, keeping them from researching potentially fatal changes to their area."
The public outrage was palpable:
WE PAID FOR THAT DATA. IT'S OURS. https://t.co/vrpPd04WmC
-- Lila Ralston (@epicdemiologist) April 24, 2017
\u201cAn election can\u2019t make data go dark. Data from public funding must remain public. #SaveTheData https://t.co/tlgofnieUA\u201d— Mark Johnson (@Mark Johnson) 1493013561
\u201cWill @HouseScience @LamarSmithTX21 ask @EPAScottPruitt to keep @EPA #OpenData site? Killing it clashes with push for transparency/cred? https://t.co/rQiVb0Q7PD\u201d— Andrew Revkin \ud83c\udf0e \u270d\ud83c\udffc \ud83e\ude95 \u262e\ufe0f (@Andrew Revkin \ud83c\udf0e \u270d\ud83c\udffc \ud83e\ude95 \u262e\ufe0f) 1493036671
The news was especially pertinent as it came in the wake of Earth Day, when tens of thousands across the globe marched against the anti-science Trump administration and in support of what Greenpeace's Tim Donaghy called "the values of the scientific method--openness, curiosity, collaboration, and respect for evidence."
But on Monday, Alex Howard of the Sunlight Foundation noted online that should the service go offline, it may not be permanent. "Remember," he wrote, "when the U.S. government 'shut down' in March 2014, a lot of government websites & data went offline."
The Hill's Timothy Cama confirmed that an EPA spokesperson told him the site "isn't shutting down, just won't get updated during a gov't shutdown" and the official EPA Twitter account on Monday posted:
\u201cRumors about the website https://t.co/LrKulKdA6t are wrong. It's open, working & not going anywhere. This website & the EPA belong to you.\u201d— U.S. EPA (@U.S. EPA) 1493042525
A new pop-up message also appeared on the Open Data site late Monday morning, pledging the data would still be available after Friday:
But given the Trump administration's record on transparency and openness--not to mention science and the environment--some maintained that "saving the data" surely couldn't hurt.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is assuring the public that a valuable citizen-linked and searchable portal that stores information on climate change, public health, and pollution will still be available after Friday, April 28.
Fresh off Saturday's global March for Science, researchers and scientists sounded the alarm on Sunday and Monday, as word spread that President Donald Trump's administration was preparing to shut down the EPA's Open Data web service by the end of the week.
Journalists and science advocates immediately launched a call to "scrape" records from the service, after open-data scientist and tech CEO Bernadette Hyland wrote on Medium that her company had received word the site would go dark at 12:00pm on Friday in the event of a government shutdown.
In her post on Sunday, Hyland noted that the service "includes detailed toxic chemical information, a 30-year history of toxic chemical releases reported by industrial and federal facilities, collected and curated by the EPA's flagship Toxics Release Inventory Program." That program, according to the EPA, "supports informed decision-making by communities, government agencies, companies, and others."
Author and software engineer David Wood further explained on Twitter that the site "contains a data warehouse of [seven] EPA databases and represents air, water, ground pollution data, [and] import/exports of toxic chemicals."
Scrapping such records, Andrew Griffin wrote at The Independent, would "mean that citizens will no longer be able to access information on their environment and climate, keeping them from researching potentially fatal changes to their area."
The public outrage was palpable:
WE PAID FOR THAT DATA. IT'S OURS. https://t.co/vrpPd04WmC
-- Lila Ralston (@epicdemiologist) April 24, 2017
\u201cAn election can\u2019t make data go dark. Data from public funding must remain public. #SaveTheData https://t.co/tlgofnieUA\u201d— Mark Johnson (@Mark Johnson) 1493013561
\u201cWill @HouseScience @LamarSmithTX21 ask @EPAScottPruitt to keep @EPA #OpenData site? Killing it clashes with push for transparency/cred? https://t.co/rQiVb0Q7PD\u201d— Andrew Revkin \ud83c\udf0e \u270d\ud83c\udffc \ud83e\ude95 \u262e\ufe0f (@Andrew Revkin \ud83c\udf0e \u270d\ud83c\udffc \ud83e\ude95 \u262e\ufe0f) 1493036671
The news was especially pertinent as it came in the wake of Earth Day, when tens of thousands across the globe marched against the anti-science Trump administration and in support of what Greenpeace's Tim Donaghy called "the values of the scientific method--openness, curiosity, collaboration, and respect for evidence."
But on Monday, Alex Howard of the Sunlight Foundation noted online that should the service go offline, it may not be permanent. "Remember," he wrote, "when the U.S. government 'shut down' in March 2014, a lot of government websites & data went offline."
The Hill's Timothy Cama confirmed that an EPA spokesperson told him the site "isn't shutting down, just won't get updated during a gov't shutdown" and the official EPA Twitter account on Monday posted:
\u201cRumors about the website https://t.co/LrKulKdA6t are wrong. It's open, working & not going anywhere. This website & the EPA belong to you.\u201d— U.S. EPA (@U.S. EPA) 1493042525
A new pop-up message also appeared on the Open Data site late Monday morning, pledging the data would still be available after Friday:
But given the Trump administration's record on transparency and openness--not to mention science and the environment--some maintained that "saving the data" surely couldn't hurt.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.