SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Trump Team Rejected Ethics Training for Staff, Cabinet, Appointees: Report
The program has been in place since 2000, but government agency told potential program operators that Trump team has 'changed its goals'
Mar 02, 2017
President Donald Trump's transition team rejected a plan to provide ethics training for senior White House staff, political appointees, and cabinet members, Politico reported Thursday.
The course would have covered leadership, ethics, and management, preparing the team for working within existing laws and executive orders, dealing with media scrutiny, and collaborating with federal agencies and members of Congress, according to documents obtained by reporters Isaac Arnsdorf and Josh Dawsey.
Both the Bush and Obama White Houses received the training, which has been in place since 2000.
However, following Trump's election, the General Services Administration (GSA) sent a letter to potential bidders for the training contract such as the Partnership for Public Service informing them that transition team had "changed its goals."
"It has been determined that the requirements as defined in the RFQ [request for quotation] do not accurately reflect the current needs of the Presidential Transition Team," the GSA's contracting officer, Matthew Gormley, wrote in the January 10 letter. "As a result of a change in Presidential Transition Team leadership after the Nov. 8, 2016, election, there have been changes in the PTT's goals for the political appointee orientation program."
Arnsdorf and Dawsey write:
The changes included the transition team's desire to control all the speakers and content, according to the notice. It is unclear if the administration put in place its own program or offered any rigorous training to appointees and nominees across the government.
The revelation comes after numerous ethics violations by the Trump team. Senior adviser Kellyanne Conway was slammed for promoting Ivanka Trump's fashion brand after the department chain Nordstrom dropped her line due to lagging sales--activists encouraged a boycott of her products in response to the president's policies--but the White House Counsel's Office announced this week it would not discipline Conway, concluding that she had spoken "inadvertently."
Trump himself faces numerous ethics complaints over his refusal to divest from his family's corporate empire while in office, among other things.
"It looks like a good program, and I wish they had implemented it," Norm Eisen, a former White House ethics lawyer who now heads up the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), told Politico. "It might have spared them the numerous ethics and other messes they have encountered."
CREW filed an ethics lawsuit against Trump last month.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
President Donald Trump's transition team rejected a plan to provide ethics training for senior White House staff, political appointees, and cabinet members, Politico reported Thursday.
The course would have covered leadership, ethics, and management, preparing the team for working within existing laws and executive orders, dealing with media scrutiny, and collaborating with federal agencies and members of Congress, according to documents obtained by reporters Isaac Arnsdorf and Josh Dawsey.
Both the Bush and Obama White Houses received the training, which has been in place since 2000.
However, following Trump's election, the General Services Administration (GSA) sent a letter to potential bidders for the training contract such as the Partnership for Public Service informing them that transition team had "changed its goals."
"It has been determined that the requirements as defined in the RFQ [request for quotation] do not accurately reflect the current needs of the Presidential Transition Team," the GSA's contracting officer, Matthew Gormley, wrote in the January 10 letter. "As a result of a change in Presidential Transition Team leadership after the Nov. 8, 2016, election, there have been changes in the PTT's goals for the political appointee orientation program."
Arnsdorf and Dawsey write:
The changes included the transition team's desire to control all the speakers and content, according to the notice. It is unclear if the administration put in place its own program or offered any rigorous training to appointees and nominees across the government.
The revelation comes after numerous ethics violations by the Trump team. Senior adviser Kellyanne Conway was slammed for promoting Ivanka Trump's fashion brand after the department chain Nordstrom dropped her line due to lagging sales--activists encouraged a boycott of her products in response to the president's policies--but the White House Counsel's Office announced this week it would not discipline Conway, concluding that she had spoken "inadvertently."
Trump himself faces numerous ethics complaints over his refusal to divest from his family's corporate empire while in office, among other things.
"It looks like a good program, and I wish they had implemented it," Norm Eisen, a former White House ethics lawyer who now heads up the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), told Politico. "It might have spared them the numerous ethics and other messes they have encountered."
CREW filed an ethics lawsuit against Trump last month.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
President Donald Trump's transition team rejected a plan to provide ethics training for senior White House staff, political appointees, and cabinet members, Politico reported Thursday.
The course would have covered leadership, ethics, and management, preparing the team for working within existing laws and executive orders, dealing with media scrutiny, and collaborating with federal agencies and members of Congress, according to documents obtained by reporters Isaac Arnsdorf and Josh Dawsey.
Both the Bush and Obama White Houses received the training, which has been in place since 2000.
However, following Trump's election, the General Services Administration (GSA) sent a letter to potential bidders for the training contract such as the Partnership for Public Service informing them that transition team had "changed its goals."
"It has been determined that the requirements as defined in the RFQ [request for quotation] do not accurately reflect the current needs of the Presidential Transition Team," the GSA's contracting officer, Matthew Gormley, wrote in the January 10 letter. "As a result of a change in Presidential Transition Team leadership after the Nov. 8, 2016, election, there have been changes in the PTT's goals for the political appointee orientation program."
Arnsdorf and Dawsey write:
The changes included the transition team's desire to control all the speakers and content, according to the notice. It is unclear if the administration put in place its own program or offered any rigorous training to appointees and nominees across the government.
The revelation comes after numerous ethics violations by the Trump team. Senior adviser Kellyanne Conway was slammed for promoting Ivanka Trump's fashion brand after the department chain Nordstrom dropped her line due to lagging sales--activists encouraged a boycott of her products in response to the president's policies--but the White House Counsel's Office announced this week it would not discipline Conway, concluding that she had spoken "inadvertently."
Trump himself faces numerous ethics complaints over his refusal to divest from his family's corporate empire while in office, among other things.
"It looks like a good program, and I wish they had implemented it," Norm Eisen, a former White House ethics lawyer who now heads up the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), told Politico. "It might have spared them the numerous ethics and other messes they have encountered."
CREW filed an ethics lawsuit against Trump last month.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy