SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
With Obamacare on Trump's Chopping Block, Researchers Fear for Health Data
The Trump team has shown a lack of reverence for government facts and figures
Dec 21, 2016
Just as scientists are scrambling to archive government climate data before President-elect Donald Trump and his "climate denial cabinet" take office, researchers are moving to download and secure "key healthcare data and documents" ahead of Inauguration Day, Politico reports Wednesday.
The activity--reportedly encouraged by the White House's top health reform official--is spurred by anxieties about Republican efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, as promised by Trump and GOP campaigners during the election. It also reflects concerns about an incoming administration that "has already cast doubt on the veracity of government data, for instance, regarding the unemployment rate," as Politico's Dan Diamond writes.
Diamond spoke with independent researchers, who said
their fears have grown since seeing reports that climate researchers--working on policies that have also become highly politicized--are copying their own data sets to ensure their continued availability. Anxieties also increased after the Trump transition team asked the Energy Department to identify employees who worked on President Barack Obama's climate initiatives. Even though the agency declined to share those names, and the Trump team disavowed the effort, researchers' concerns snowballed.
Several told Politico that they were unnerved by candidate Trump's falsehoods about the economy and the health care law, and they're worried that agencies will feel pressure to fall in line. That's why they've launched their proactive effort to stockpile health data and are keeping tabs on their combined progress.
Diamond further reported:
[T]his transition could have far-reaching consequences for HHS's data integrity, given the vehement opposition by Trump and his lieutenants to Obamacare and their challenges of official government data.
"It's a serious concern," said a former HHS researcher, who experienced the Clinton-to-Bush handoff in 2001 and believes this one will be significantly worse. "We've seen during Trump's campaign, and at the beginning of the transition...a lot of statements where the distinctions between rhetoric and fact become very loose."
Posting a link to the Politico story, news commentator Joy-Ann Reid wrote, "You would be forgiven for wondering what country and decade this refers to."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Just as scientists are scrambling to archive government climate data before President-elect Donald Trump and his "climate denial cabinet" take office, researchers are moving to download and secure "key healthcare data and documents" ahead of Inauguration Day, Politico reports Wednesday.
The activity--reportedly encouraged by the White House's top health reform official--is spurred by anxieties about Republican efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, as promised by Trump and GOP campaigners during the election. It also reflects concerns about an incoming administration that "has already cast doubt on the veracity of government data, for instance, regarding the unemployment rate," as Politico's Dan Diamond writes.
Diamond spoke with independent researchers, who said
their fears have grown since seeing reports that climate researchers--working on policies that have also become highly politicized--are copying their own data sets to ensure their continued availability. Anxieties also increased after the Trump transition team asked the Energy Department to identify employees who worked on President Barack Obama's climate initiatives. Even though the agency declined to share those names, and the Trump team disavowed the effort, researchers' concerns snowballed.
Several told Politico that they were unnerved by candidate Trump's falsehoods about the economy and the health care law, and they're worried that agencies will feel pressure to fall in line. That's why they've launched their proactive effort to stockpile health data and are keeping tabs on their combined progress.
Diamond further reported:
[T]his transition could have far-reaching consequences for HHS's data integrity, given the vehement opposition by Trump and his lieutenants to Obamacare and their challenges of official government data.
"It's a serious concern," said a former HHS researcher, who experienced the Clinton-to-Bush handoff in 2001 and believes this one will be significantly worse. "We've seen during Trump's campaign, and at the beginning of the transition...a lot of statements where the distinctions between rhetoric and fact become very loose."
Posting a link to the Politico story, news commentator Joy-Ann Reid wrote, "You would be forgiven for wondering what country and decade this refers to."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Just as scientists are scrambling to archive government climate data before President-elect Donald Trump and his "climate denial cabinet" take office, researchers are moving to download and secure "key healthcare data and documents" ahead of Inauguration Day, Politico reports Wednesday.
The activity--reportedly encouraged by the White House's top health reform official--is spurred by anxieties about Republican efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, as promised by Trump and GOP campaigners during the election. It also reflects concerns about an incoming administration that "has already cast doubt on the veracity of government data, for instance, regarding the unemployment rate," as Politico's Dan Diamond writes.
Diamond spoke with independent researchers, who said
their fears have grown since seeing reports that climate researchers--working on policies that have also become highly politicized--are copying their own data sets to ensure their continued availability. Anxieties also increased after the Trump transition team asked the Energy Department to identify employees who worked on President Barack Obama's climate initiatives. Even though the agency declined to share those names, and the Trump team disavowed the effort, researchers' concerns snowballed.
Several told Politico that they were unnerved by candidate Trump's falsehoods about the economy and the health care law, and they're worried that agencies will feel pressure to fall in line. That's why they've launched their proactive effort to stockpile health data and are keeping tabs on their combined progress.
Diamond further reported:
[T]his transition could have far-reaching consequences for HHS's data integrity, given the vehement opposition by Trump and his lieutenants to Obamacare and their challenges of official government data.
"It's a serious concern," said a former HHS researcher, who experienced the Clinton-to-Bush handoff in 2001 and believes this one will be significantly worse. "We've seen during Trump's campaign, and at the beginning of the transition...a lot of statements where the distinctions between rhetoric and fact become very loose."
Posting a link to the Politico story, news commentator Joy-Ann Reid wrote, "You would be forgiven for wondering what country and decade this refers to."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy