

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Austria's far-right presidential candidate Norbert Hofer--who some thought might benefit from a so-called "Trump bump" at the polls--conceded defeat on Sunday, paving the way for "liberal-minded" Alexander Van der Bellen to step into the presidency.
Exit polls released shortly after the polls closed Sunday showed Van der Bellen with 53.5 percent of the vote and Hofer with 46.4 percent.
Speaking on Austrian state television, Van der Bellen said he "always campaigned for a pro-European Austria. This is about values: freedom, equality, and solidarity. Also to include those that don't do that well in the current economic system."
He said he would "actively speak to all voters, including those of Hofer's party. They have real concerns that have to be taken seriously by the president."
A left-leaning candidate who preached tolerance on the campaign trail, Van der Bellen was the hope of Austrians who wanted to stop Hofer, head of the anti-migrant and anti-EU Freedom Party.
At 72, the grey-haired economics professor often cut a wooden and somewhat dishevelled figure on the campaign trail next to smooth-talking gun enthusiast Hofer, 45.
With many EU leaders welcoming Van der Bellen's victory, BBC Europe editor Katya Adler wrote, "[t]he sigh of relief at the outcome of Austria's presidential election was very loud indeed in Brussels."
However, she noted that "voters in Austria--as across much of Europe and in the U.S.--were divided. There weren't many percentage points between the presidential candidates. So there will be disappointment tonight, too, amongst those who support a more nationalist-minded, anti-globalization, immigration-limiting point of view."
"If we've learnt one thing from Brexit and the U.S. elections," Adler continued, "it's that voters are in an unpredictable mood. Anti-establishment sentiment is on the rise, but election victories for Europe's so-called populists are far from inevitable."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Austria's far-right presidential candidate Norbert Hofer--who some thought might benefit from a so-called "Trump bump" at the polls--conceded defeat on Sunday, paving the way for "liberal-minded" Alexander Van der Bellen to step into the presidency.
Exit polls released shortly after the polls closed Sunday showed Van der Bellen with 53.5 percent of the vote and Hofer with 46.4 percent.
Speaking on Austrian state television, Van der Bellen said he "always campaigned for a pro-European Austria. This is about values: freedom, equality, and solidarity. Also to include those that don't do that well in the current economic system."
He said he would "actively speak to all voters, including those of Hofer's party. They have real concerns that have to be taken seriously by the president."
A left-leaning candidate who preached tolerance on the campaign trail, Van der Bellen was the hope of Austrians who wanted to stop Hofer, head of the anti-migrant and anti-EU Freedom Party.
At 72, the grey-haired economics professor often cut a wooden and somewhat dishevelled figure on the campaign trail next to smooth-talking gun enthusiast Hofer, 45.
With many EU leaders welcoming Van der Bellen's victory, BBC Europe editor Katya Adler wrote, "[t]he sigh of relief at the outcome of Austria's presidential election was very loud indeed in Brussels."
However, she noted that "voters in Austria--as across much of Europe and in the U.S.--were divided. There weren't many percentage points between the presidential candidates. So there will be disappointment tonight, too, amongst those who support a more nationalist-minded, anti-globalization, immigration-limiting point of view."
"If we've learnt one thing from Brexit and the U.S. elections," Adler continued, "it's that voters are in an unpredictable mood. Anti-establishment sentiment is on the rise, but election victories for Europe's so-called populists are far from inevitable."
Austria's far-right presidential candidate Norbert Hofer--who some thought might benefit from a so-called "Trump bump" at the polls--conceded defeat on Sunday, paving the way for "liberal-minded" Alexander Van der Bellen to step into the presidency.
Exit polls released shortly after the polls closed Sunday showed Van der Bellen with 53.5 percent of the vote and Hofer with 46.4 percent.
Speaking on Austrian state television, Van der Bellen said he "always campaigned for a pro-European Austria. This is about values: freedom, equality, and solidarity. Also to include those that don't do that well in the current economic system."
He said he would "actively speak to all voters, including those of Hofer's party. They have real concerns that have to be taken seriously by the president."
A left-leaning candidate who preached tolerance on the campaign trail, Van der Bellen was the hope of Austrians who wanted to stop Hofer, head of the anti-migrant and anti-EU Freedom Party.
At 72, the grey-haired economics professor often cut a wooden and somewhat dishevelled figure on the campaign trail next to smooth-talking gun enthusiast Hofer, 45.
With many EU leaders welcoming Van der Bellen's victory, BBC Europe editor Katya Adler wrote, "[t]he sigh of relief at the outcome of Austria's presidential election was very loud indeed in Brussels."
However, she noted that "voters in Austria--as across much of Europe and in the U.S.--were divided. There weren't many percentage points between the presidential candidates. So there will be disappointment tonight, too, amongst those who support a more nationalist-minded, anti-globalization, immigration-limiting point of view."
"If we've learnt one thing from Brexit and the U.S. elections," Adler continued, "it's that voters are in an unpredictable mood. Anti-establishment sentiment is on the rise, but election victories for Europe's so-called populists are far from inevitable."