Oct 14, 2016
Outrage is growing this week amid revelations that the pharmaceutical company Valeant raised the price for its critical lead-poisoning treatment by more than 2,700 percent in a single year.
Before Valeant took control of the medication, known as Calcium EDTA, in 2013, the average price for a package of vials was stable at $950, the medical news outlet STAT reported. But once the notorious pharmaceutical company bought it out in a multi-billion dollar deal, it swiftly boosted the price to $7,116 in January 2014 and to $26,927 by December of that year.
"This is a drug that has long been a standard of care, and until recently it was widely accessible at an affordable price," Dr. Michael Kosnett, an associate clinical professor, told STAT. He also contacted U.S. Congress. "There's no justification for the astronomical price increases by Valeant, which limit availability of the drug to children with life-threatening lead poisoning."
And at least one person in Congress is listening. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) retweeted the STAT article this week and noted that the price remains high as Flint, Michigan suffers a very public lead poisoning crisis.
"While kids in Flint are poisoned by lead, Valeant charges $27,000 for the leading treatment," wrote the senator, who made anti-price gouging legislation a cornerstone of his presidential campaign.
\u201cWhile kids in Flint are poisoned by lead, Valeant charges $27,000 for the leading treatment. https://t.co/aHekRjp5A7\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1476221177
STAT described Valeant as the "poster child for pharmaceutical greed." Business Insiderdetailed some of the company's disreputable history, which included raising the cost of a heart medication last year:
Last year's heart-drug scandal and accusations of accounting malfeasance from a short seller combined to bring the once high-flying company's stock price down around 90%. It has yet to recover.
The fallout from all of that included the ouster of the company's CEO, a bunch of federal and state investigations, and a congressional hearing in which Valeant executives and board members, including billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, promised to lower prices.
According to the company's new CEO, though, they haven't.
A representative from Valeant claimed to STAT that the higher price for the lead poisoning medication helps the company increase access to hospitals--but that familiar argument did little to convince doctors.
Dr. Timur Durrani, an assistant clinical professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, told STAT that the price simply "isn't justified. Is Valeant doing something so magical that it takes thousands of dollars to make it sterile?"
As Sanders continued on Twitter, "In a single year Valeant hiked up the price more than 2,700 [percent]. We must bring their greed to an end."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Outrage is growing this week amid revelations that the pharmaceutical company Valeant raised the price for its critical lead-poisoning treatment by more than 2,700 percent in a single year.
Before Valeant took control of the medication, known as Calcium EDTA, in 2013, the average price for a package of vials was stable at $950, the medical news outlet STAT reported. But once the notorious pharmaceutical company bought it out in a multi-billion dollar deal, it swiftly boosted the price to $7,116 in January 2014 and to $26,927 by December of that year.
"This is a drug that has long been a standard of care, and until recently it was widely accessible at an affordable price," Dr. Michael Kosnett, an associate clinical professor, told STAT. He also contacted U.S. Congress. "There's no justification for the astronomical price increases by Valeant, which limit availability of the drug to children with life-threatening lead poisoning."
And at least one person in Congress is listening. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) retweeted the STAT article this week and noted that the price remains high as Flint, Michigan suffers a very public lead poisoning crisis.
"While kids in Flint are poisoned by lead, Valeant charges $27,000 for the leading treatment," wrote the senator, who made anti-price gouging legislation a cornerstone of his presidential campaign.
\u201cWhile kids in Flint are poisoned by lead, Valeant charges $27,000 for the leading treatment. https://t.co/aHekRjp5A7\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1476221177
STAT described Valeant as the "poster child for pharmaceutical greed." Business Insiderdetailed some of the company's disreputable history, which included raising the cost of a heart medication last year:
Last year's heart-drug scandal and accusations of accounting malfeasance from a short seller combined to bring the once high-flying company's stock price down around 90%. It has yet to recover.
The fallout from all of that included the ouster of the company's CEO, a bunch of federal and state investigations, and a congressional hearing in which Valeant executives and board members, including billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, promised to lower prices.
According to the company's new CEO, though, they haven't.
A representative from Valeant claimed to STAT that the higher price for the lead poisoning medication helps the company increase access to hospitals--but that familiar argument did little to convince doctors.
Dr. Timur Durrani, an assistant clinical professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, told STAT that the price simply "isn't justified. Is Valeant doing something so magical that it takes thousands of dollars to make it sterile?"
As Sanders continued on Twitter, "In a single year Valeant hiked up the price more than 2,700 [percent]. We must bring their greed to an end."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Outrage is growing this week amid revelations that the pharmaceutical company Valeant raised the price for its critical lead-poisoning treatment by more than 2,700 percent in a single year.
Before Valeant took control of the medication, known as Calcium EDTA, in 2013, the average price for a package of vials was stable at $950, the medical news outlet STAT reported. But once the notorious pharmaceutical company bought it out in a multi-billion dollar deal, it swiftly boosted the price to $7,116 in January 2014 and to $26,927 by December of that year.
"This is a drug that has long been a standard of care, and until recently it was widely accessible at an affordable price," Dr. Michael Kosnett, an associate clinical professor, told STAT. He also contacted U.S. Congress. "There's no justification for the astronomical price increases by Valeant, which limit availability of the drug to children with life-threatening lead poisoning."
And at least one person in Congress is listening. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) retweeted the STAT article this week and noted that the price remains high as Flint, Michigan suffers a very public lead poisoning crisis.
"While kids in Flint are poisoned by lead, Valeant charges $27,000 for the leading treatment," wrote the senator, who made anti-price gouging legislation a cornerstone of his presidential campaign.
\u201cWhile kids in Flint are poisoned by lead, Valeant charges $27,000 for the leading treatment. https://t.co/aHekRjp5A7\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1476221177
STAT described Valeant as the "poster child for pharmaceutical greed." Business Insiderdetailed some of the company's disreputable history, which included raising the cost of a heart medication last year:
Last year's heart-drug scandal and accusations of accounting malfeasance from a short seller combined to bring the once high-flying company's stock price down around 90%. It has yet to recover.
The fallout from all of that included the ouster of the company's CEO, a bunch of federal and state investigations, and a congressional hearing in which Valeant executives and board members, including billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, promised to lower prices.
According to the company's new CEO, though, they haven't.
A representative from Valeant claimed to STAT that the higher price for the lead poisoning medication helps the company increase access to hospitals--but that familiar argument did little to convince doctors.
Dr. Timur Durrani, an assistant clinical professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, told STAT that the price simply "isn't justified. Is Valeant doing something so magical that it takes thousands of dollars to make it sterile?"
As Sanders continued on Twitter, "In a single year Valeant hiked up the price more than 2,700 [percent]. We must bring their greed to an end."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.