'Release the Tapes!': Demand for Transparency Grows in Charlotte and Beyond
"The public owns this video."
As protests in Charlotte continued peacefully for a third night on Thursday, the call for the city government and police to release the footage of Keith Lamont Scott being shot has reached fever pitch.
Despite a midnight curfew, hundreds took the streets again, this time marching to the police station where they rallied and demanded the release of the police tapes.
On Thursday, Charlotte Police Chief Kerr Putney said officials had no plans to release existing video footage of the shooting, despite conflicting claims about whether Scott was armed and posed any threat to the officers. His family has said that he did not possess a gun.
One of the family's attorneys, Justin Bamberg, who viewed the footage along with the family, told Reuters Friday that, "There's nothing in that video that shows him acting aggressively, threatening or maybe dangerous," adding that it is "impossible to discern" what, if anything, he is holding in his hand.
The Scott family said they have "more questions than answers" after viewing the tapes and joined others demanding their public release.
Both the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the NAACP have asked for the footage to be made public.
Rev. Dr. William Barber, president of the North Carolina NAACP and leader of the Moral Mondays movement, told Democracy Now! on Friday that Gov. Pat McCrory "wants to suppress the public's video," adding, "The public owns this video."
Corine Mack, president of the NAACP Charlotte-Mecklenburg branch, said that it is particularly important in this climate of heightened racial tensions for police and other city officials to remain transparent.
"I think it's important, because of the climate we're in, the distrust of the police department and law enforcement, that that video or those videos be shown to the entire citizenry of Charlotte-Mecklenburg," Mack said Thursday.
Moreover, she noted that North Carolina "spent millions of dollars to ensure that each police officer had on a body cam, and there were several cops on the day of this incident who did not. And this is not something that has happened once or twice; it's happened far too often. Either they don't have on a body cam, or they cut off their body cam. That's a problem for us."
Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst for the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, explained in a column why the public release of police videos is such a "crucial" component of transparency.
"Police today often complain that a pall of suspicion has fallen upon their whole profession," Stanley notes. "But all too often it looks like 'the fix is in'--that the problems are cultural or systemic, that the police get special treatment with regards to justice, that the police cannot police themselves, and that nobody else is doing so."
He continues:
It is within this frame that people are likely to view police refusal to release video of a critical incident. Are police and prosecutors playing it straight, ready to let the chips fall where they may when it comes to investigating a potentially criminal police action and bringing justice? Or are they circling the wagons to protect one of their own? When Americans suspect they're seeing the latter, that's when they're likely to hit the streets.
Many observers are comparing the Charlotte police department's refusal to release its footage to the case in Tulsa, Oklahoma, where Terence Crutcher was shot and killed by police in recent days.
There, the police department did release the disturbing footage and on Thursday the city's District Attorneys office filed charges against the shooting officer.
"By contrast," wrote the New York Times editorial board on Thursday, "the Police Department in Charlotte, N.C., has responded in exactly the wrong way to a police officer's killing on Tuesday of another black man, Keith Scott. It has opted for stonewalling."
Stanley, the ACLU of North Carolina, and the Times editorial board all noted that the lack of transparency in North Carolina has been buoyed by McCrory and the state's Republican-led legislature, which recently passed a "disgraceful" law that prevents law enforcement agencies from releasing body camera footage without a court order. That law takes effect on October 1.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As protests in Charlotte continued peacefully for a third night on Thursday, the call for the city government and police to release the footage of Keith Lamont Scott being shot has reached fever pitch.
Despite a midnight curfew, hundreds took the streets again, this time marching to the police station where they rallied and demanded the release of the police tapes.
On Thursday, Charlotte Police Chief Kerr Putney said officials had no plans to release existing video footage of the shooting, despite conflicting claims about whether Scott was armed and posed any threat to the officers. His family has said that he did not possess a gun.
One of the family's attorneys, Justin Bamberg, who viewed the footage along with the family, told Reuters Friday that, "There's nothing in that video that shows him acting aggressively, threatening or maybe dangerous," adding that it is "impossible to discern" what, if anything, he is holding in his hand.
The Scott family said they have "more questions than answers" after viewing the tapes and joined others demanding their public release.
Both the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the NAACP have asked for the footage to be made public.
Rev. Dr. William Barber, president of the North Carolina NAACP and leader of the Moral Mondays movement, told Democracy Now! on Friday that Gov. Pat McCrory "wants to suppress the public's video," adding, "The public owns this video."
Corine Mack, president of the NAACP Charlotte-Mecklenburg branch, said that it is particularly important in this climate of heightened racial tensions for police and other city officials to remain transparent.
"I think it's important, because of the climate we're in, the distrust of the police department and law enforcement, that that video or those videos be shown to the entire citizenry of Charlotte-Mecklenburg," Mack said Thursday.
Moreover, she noted that North Carolina "spent millions of dollars to ensure that each police officer had on a body cam, and there were several cops on the day of this incident who did not. And this is not something that has happened once or twice; it's happened far too often. Either they don't have on a body cam, or they cut off their body cam. That's a problem for us."
Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst for the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, explained in a column why the public release of police videos is such a "crucial" component of transparency.
"Police today often complain that a pall of suspicion has fallen upon their whole profession," Stanley notes. "But all too often it looks like 'the fix is in'--that the problems are cultural or systemic, that the police get special treatment with regards to justice, that the police cannot police themselves, and that nobody else is doing so."
He continues:
It is within this frame that people are likely to view police refusal to release video of a critical incident. Are police and prosecutors playing it straight, ready to let the chips fall where they may when it comes to investigating a potentially criminal police action and bringing justice? Or are they circling the wagons to protect one of their own? When Americans suspect they're seeing the latter, that's when they're likely to hit the streets.
Many observers are comparing the Charlotte police department's refusal to release its footage to the case in Tulsa, Oklahoma, where Terence Crutcher was shot and killed by police in recent days.
There, the police department did release the disturbing footage and on Thursday the city's District Attorneys office filed charges against the shooting officer.
"By contrast," wrote the New York Times editorial board on Thursday, "the Police Department in Charlotte, N.C., has responded in exactly the wrong way to a police officer's killing on Tuesday of another black man, Keith Scott. It has opted for stonewalling."
Stanley, the ACLU of North Carolina, and the Times editorial board all noted that the lack of transparency in North Carolina has been buoyed by McCrory and the state's Republican-led legislature, which recently passed a "disgraceful" law that prevents law enforcement agencies from releasing body camera footage without a court order. That law takes effect on October 1.
As protests in Charlotte continued peacefully for a third night on Thursday, the call for the city government and police to release the footage of Keith Lamont Scott being shot has reached fever pitch.
Despite a midnight curfew, hundreds took the streets again, this time marching to the police station where they rallied and demanded the release of the police tapes.
On Thursday, Charlotte Police Chief Kerr Putney said officials had no plans to release existing video footage of the shooting, despite conflicting claims about whether Scott was armed and posed any threat to the officers. His family has said that he did not possess a gun.
One of the family's attorneys, Justin Bamberg, who viewed the footage along with the family, told Reuters Friday that, "There's nothing in that video that shows him acting aggressively, threatening or maybe dangerous," adding that it is "impossible to discern" what, if anything, he is holding in his hand.
The Scott family said they have "more questions than answers" after viewing the tapes and joined others demanding their public release.
Both the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the NAACP have asked for the footage to be made public.
Rev. Dr. William Barber, president of the North Carolina NAACP and leader of the Moral Mondays movement, told Democracy Now! on Friday that Gov. Pat McCrory "wants to suppress the public's video," adding, "The public owns this video."
Corine Mack, president of the NAACP Charlotte-Mecklenburg branch, said that it is particularly important in this climate of heightened racial tensions for police and other city officials to remain transparent.
"I think it's important, because of the climate we're in, the distrust of the police department and law enforcement, that that video or those videos be shown to the entire citizenry of Charlotte-Mecklenburg," Mack said Thursday.
Moreover, she noted that North Carolina "spent millions of dollars to ensure that each police officer had on a body cam, and there were several cops on the day of this incident who did not. And this is not something that has happened once or twice; it's happened far too often. Either they don't have on a body cam, or they cut off their body cam. That's a problem for us."
Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst for the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, explained in a column why the public release of police videos is such a "crucial" component of transparency.
"Police today often complain that a pall of suspicion has fallen upon their whole profession," Stanley notes. "But all too often it looks like 'the fix is in'--that the problems are cultural or systemic, that the police get special treatment with regards to justice, that the police cannot police themselves, and that nobody else is doing so."
He continues:
It is within this frame that people are likely to view police refusal to release video of a critical incident. Are police and prosecutors playing it straight, ready to let the chips fall where they may when it comes to investigating a potentially criminal police action and bringing justice? Or are they circling the wagons to protect one of their own? When Americans suspect they're seeing the latter, that's when they're likely to hit the streets.
Many observers are comparing the Charlotte police department's refusal to release its footage to the case in Tulsa, Oklahoma, where Terence Crutcher was shot and killed by police in recent days.
There, the police department did release the disturbing footage and on Thursday the city's District Attorneys office filed charges against the shooting officer.
"By contrast," wrote the New York Times editorial board on Thursday, "the Police Department in Charlotte, N.C., has responded in exactly the wrong way to a police officer's killing on Tuesday of another black man, Keith Scott. It has opted for stonewalling."
Stanley, the ACLU of North Carolina, and the Times editorial board all noted that the lack of transparency in North Carolina has been buoyed by McCrory and the state's Republican-led legislature, which recently passed a "disgraceful" law that prevents law enforcement agencies from releasing body camera footage without a court order. That law takes effect on October 1.