SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Mega-Utility Dodges $500M 'Bullet' as Feds Slash Potential Fine for Pipeline Explosion
New possible penalties add up to approximately one percent of original $562 million fine for explosion that killed eight people in California
Aug 03, 2016
A federal judge on Tuesday night quietly slashed a potential $562 million fine against Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PG&E) for the privately owned, publicly regulated utility's role in a 2010 deadly natural gas pipeline explosion near San Francisco.
The incident six years ago "sent a giant plume of fire into the air, killing eight people and destroying 38 homes in the San Francisco Bay Area city of San Bruno," the Associated Press recalls.
As Common Dreams noted at the time, "In the weeks before the catastrophe, residents had been reporting gas odors and had voiced fears about a leak. But this brought no action from the company. A state assemblyman from the San Bruno area noted that the torn pipeline was over 60 years old, having been installed in 1948. He criticized PG&E for its poor maintenance and lax response. After the explosion, it took the company almost three hours to shut off the gas supply."
SFGate explained on Tuesday:
Prosecutors had maintained, in filings before and during the trial, that California's largest utility could be punished for any convictions with penalties equal to twice the amount it saved by shortcutting safety laws. They said those savings could be measured by the $281 million that PG&E estimated it would cost to comply with safety standards after the San Bruno explosion--leading to a potential fine of $562 million if the federal jury in San Francisco returned guilty verdicts.
But on Tuesday, "abruptly and without explanation"--and while the jury was still deliberating--federal prosecutors "walked away" from the hefty fine and U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson signed off just hours later.
Now, the maximum fine would be $500,000 per conviction, or $6 million for all 12 counts--11 felony violations of laws that require gas pipeline operators to inspect their lines closely for potential risks, and one count of obstructing the federal investigation of the explosion. Six million is approximately one percent of 562 million.
"PG&E Corp. just dodged another bullet," wrote Bloomberg, which also noted that a $6 million fine "would be less than half a percent of the $1.5 billion profit PG&E recorded last year."
"It seems a rather remarkable development at this point in the criminal case," Paul Patterson, an analyst at Glenrock Associates LLC, told Bloomberg of the government's decision. "It would appear to be a substantial reduction in the financial risk associated with potentially a much higher fine."
NBC News reports that the decision "left San Bruno officials stunned," while expressions of shock and frustration also appeared online:
Kevin Collins, a lawyer and former federal prosecutor in Texas who has been following the PG&E trial, told The Recorder that prosecutors appear to have been "outmaneuvered or outgunned" by PG&E's defense team.
After all, as author Michael Parenti wrote in 2010: "Like any other multi-billion-dollar firm, PG&E is first and foremost in the business of making the highest possible payoffs for its shareholders and its executives. The system works just fine for those whose real job is to skim the cream, those who do not have to pay the costs. That is the alpha and omega of modern corporate capitalism."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
A federal judge on Tuesday night quietly slashed a potential $562 million fine against Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PG&E) for the privately owned, publicly regulated utility's role in a 2010 deadly natural gas pipeline explosion near San Francisco.
The incident six years ago "sent a giant plume of fire into the air, killing eight people and destroying 38 homes in the San Francisco Bay Area city of San Bruno," the Associated Press recalls.
As Common Dreams noted at the time, "In the weeks before the catastrophe, residents had been reporting gas odors and had voiced fears about a leak. But this brought no action from the company. A state assemblyman from the San Bruno area noted that the torn pipeline was over 60 years old, having been installed in 1948. He criticized PG&E for its poor maintenance and lax response. After the explosion, it took the company almost three hours to shut off the gas supply."
SFGate explained on Tuesday:
Prosecutors had maintained, in filings before and during the trial, that California's largest utility could be punished for any convictions with penalties equal to twice the amount it saved by shortcutting safety laws. They said those savings could be measured by the $281 million that PG&E estimated it would cost to comply with safety standards after the San Bruno explosion--leading to a potential fine of $562 million if the federal jury in San Francisco returned guilty verdicts.
But on Tuesday, "abruptly and without explanation"--and while the jury was still deliberating--federal prosecutors "walked away" from the hefty fine and U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson signed off just hours later.
Now, the maximum fine would be $500,000 per conviction, or $6 million for all 12 counts--11 felony violations of laws that require gas pipeline operators to inspect their lines closely for potential risks, and one count of obstructing the federal investigation of the explosion. Six million is approximately one percent of 562 million.
"PG&E Corp. just dodged another bullet," wrote Bloomberg, which also noted that a $6 million fine "would be less than half a percent of the $1.5 billion profit PG&E recorded last year."
"It seems a rather remarkable development at this point in the criminal case," Paul Patterson, an analyst at Glenrock Associates LLC, told Bloomberg of the government's decision. "It would appear to be a substantial reduction in the financial risk associated with potentially a much higher fine."
NBC News reports that the decision "left San Bruno officials stunned," while expressions of shock and frustration also appeared online:
Kevin Collins, a lawyer and former federal prosecutor in Texas who has been following the PG&E trial, told The Recorder that prosecutors appear to have been "outmaneuvered or outgunned" by PG&E's defense team.
After all, as author Michael Parenti wrote in 2010: "Like any other multi-billion-dollar firm, PG&E is first and foremost in the business of making the highest possible payoffs for its shareholders and its executives. The system works just fine for those whose real job is to skim the cream, those who do not have to pay the costs. That is the alpha and omega of modern corporate capitalism."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
A federal judge on Tuesday night quietly slashed a potential $562 million fine against Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PG&E) for the privately owned, publicly regulated utility's role in a 2010 deadly natural gas pipeline explosion near San Francisco.
The incident six years ago "sent a giant plume of fire into the air, killing eight people and destroying 38 homes in the San Francisco Bay Area city of San Bruno," the Associated Press recalls.
As Common Dreams noted at the time, "In the weeks before the catastrophe, residents had been reporting gas odors and had voiced fears about a leak. But this brought no action from the company. A state assemblyman from the San Bruno area noted that the torn pipeline was over 60 years old, having been installed in 1948. He criticized PG&E for its poor maintenance and lax response. After the explosion, it took the company almost three hours to shut off the gas supply."
SFGate explained on Tuesday:
Prosecutors had maintained, in filings before and during the trial, that California's largest utility could be punished for any convictions with penalties equal to twice the amount it saved by shortcutting safety laws. They said those savings could be measured by the $281 million that PG&E estimated it would cost to comply with safety standards after the San Bruno explosion--leading to a potential fine of $562 million if the federal jury in San Francisco returned guilty verdicts.
But on Tuesday, "abruptly and without explanation"--and while the jury was still deliberating--federal prosecutors "walked away" from the hefty fine and U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson signed off just hours later.
Now, the maximum fine would be $500,000 per conviction, or $6 million for all 12 counts--11 felony violations of laws that require gas pipeline operators to inspect their lines closely for potential risks, and one count of obstructing the federal investigation of the explosion. Six million is approximately one percent of 562 million.
"PG&E Corp. just dodged another bullet," wrote Bloomberg, which also noted that a $6 million fine "would be less than half a percent of the $1.5 billion profit PG&E recorded last year."
"It seems a rather remarkable development at this point in the criminal case," Paul Patterson, an analyst at Glenrock Associates LLC, told Bloomberg of the government's decision. "It would appear to be a substantial reduction in the financial risk associated with potentially a much higher fine."
NBC News reports that the decision "left San Bruno officials stunned," while expressions of shock and frustration also appeared online:
Kevin Collins, a lawyer and former federal prosecutor in Texas who has been following the PG&E trial, told The Recorder that prosecutors appear to have been "outmaneuvered or outgunned" by PG&E's defense team.
After all, as author Michael Parenti wrote in 2010: "Like any other multi-billion-dollar firm, PG&E is first and foremost in the business of making the highest possible payoffs for its shareholders and its executives. The system works just fine for those whose real job is to skim the cream, those who do not have to pay the costs. That is the alpha and omega of modern corporate capitalism."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.