SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
New Report Reveals Scope of FBI's Covert Facial Recognition Program
Majority of 411 million photos in database 'are of Americans and foreigners who have committed no crimes'
Jun 16, 2016
The FBI is using a dubious facial recognition system and a database of hundreds of millions more photographs than previously thought to hunt for criminal suspects, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
The massive database houses roughly 411 million photos amassed from sources such as driver's licenses, visa applications, biometrics data, and passport applications, as well as surveillance camera footage, the GAO found in its report (pdf).
That number also includes 30 million civil and criminal mugshots--but, as Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) senior staff attorney Jennifer Lynch wrote in a blog post on Wednesday, the vast majority "are of Americans and foreigners who have committed no crimes."
FBI officials did not report the potential civil liberties impact of the program until the audit, which breaks both agency policy and federal law, according to the GAO, which noted that 1974 Privacy Act limits the collection of personal data and requires agencies to disclose what kinds of information they are using.
The GAO began its audit to look into a program called the Next Generation Identification-Interstate Photo System (NGI-IPS or NGI), but found instead that NGI was part of a much larger operation known as Facial Analysis, Comparison, and Evaluation (FACE) Services. While the FBI was known to be using facial recognition software, the new report reveals the scope of the program.
The investigation gave some long-awaited answers to the EFF, which previously sought information about the NGI program through a FOIA request. Lynch wrote that, in addition to the revelations about just how many photos the FBI has access to, the agency "has been hiding this fact from the public--in flagrant violation of federal law and agency policy--for years."
The FBI uses its photo database, as well as those of other agencies including the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), to cross-reference images of criminal suspects. But the wide scope of the program raises questions about its level of accuracy.
Lynch wrote:
The FBI has conducted only very limited testing to ensure the accuracy of NGI's face recognition capabilities. And it has not taken any steps to determine whether the face recognition systems of its external partners--states and other federal agencies--are sufficiently accurate to prevent innocent people from being identified as criminal suspects. As we know from previous research, face recognition is notoriously inaccurate across the board and may also misidentify African Americans and ethnic minorities, young people, and women at higher rates than whites, older people, and men, respectively.
The FBI "did not specify how often incorrect matches were returned," the report states, adding that there was no information available about the rate of false positives.
As Lynch explained to the Guardian, detailed facial recognition information collected from driver's licenses is typically kept for cases of identity theft. "Data that's being collected for one purpose is being used for a very different purpose and that's not the way we operate in our democratic system," she said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The FBI is using a dubious facial recognition system and a database of hundreds of millions more photographs than previously thought to hunt for criminal suspects, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
The massive database houses roughly 411 million photos amassed from sources such as driver's licenses, visa applications, biometrics data, and passport applications, as well as surveillance camera footage, the GAO found in its report (pdf).
That number also includes 30 million civil and criminal mugshots--but, as Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) senior staff attorney Jennifer Lynch wrote in a blog post on Wednesday, the vast majority "are of Americans and foreigners who have committed no crimes."
FBI officials did not report the potential civil liberties impact of the program until the audit, which breaks both agency policy and federal law, according to the GAO, which noted that 1974 Privacy Act limits the collection of personal data and requires agencies to disclose what kinds of information they are using.
The GAO began its audit to look into a program called the Next Generation Identification-Interstate Photo System (NGI-IPS or NGI), but found instead that NGI was part of a much larger operation known as Facial Analysis, Comparison, and Evaluation (FACE) Services. While the FBI was known to be using facial recognition software, the new report reveals the scope of the program.
The investigation gave some long-awaited answers to the EFF, which previously sought information about the NGI program through a FOIA request. Lynch wrote that, in addition to the revelations about just how many photos the FBI has access to, the agency "has been hiding this fact from the public--in flagrant violation of federal law and agency policy--for years."
The FBI uses its photo database, as well as those of other agencies including the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), to cross-reference images of criminal suspects. But the wide scope of the program raises questions about its level of accuracy.
Lynch wrote:
The FBI has conducted only very limited testing to ensure the accuracy of NGI's face recognition capabilities. And it has not taken any steps to determine whether the face recognition systems of its external partners--states and other federal agencies--are sufficiently accurate to prevent innocent people from being identified as criminal suspects. As we know from previous research, face recognition is notoriously inaccurate across the board and may also misidentify African Americans and ethnic minorities, young people, and women at higher rates than whites, older people, and men, respectively.
The FBI "did not specify how often incorrect matches were returned," the report states, adding that there was no information available about the rate of false positives.
As Lynch explained to the Guardian, detailed facial recognition information collected from driver's licenses is typically kept for cases of identity theft. "Data that's being collected for one purpose is being used for a very different purpose and that's not the way we operate in our democratic system," she said.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The FBI is using a dubious facial recognition system and a database of hundreds of millions more photographs than previously thought to hunt for criminal suspects, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
The massive database houses roughly 411 million photos amassed from sources such as driver's licenses, visa applications, biometrics data, and passport applications, as well as surveillance camera footage, the GAO found in its report (pdf).
That number also includes 30 million civil and criminal mugshots--but, as Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) senior staff attorney Jennifer Lynch wrote in a blog post on Wednesday, the vast majority "are of Americans and foreigners who have committed no crimes."
FBI officials did not report the potential civil liberties impact of the program until the audit, which breaks both agency policy and federal law, according to the GAO, which noted that 1974 Privacy Act limits the collection of personal data and requires agencies to disclose what kinds of information they are using.
The GAO began its audit to look into a program called the Next Generation Identification-Interstate Photo System (NGI-IPS or NGI), but found instead that NGI was part of a much larger operation known as Facial Analysis, Comparison, and Evaluation (FACE) Services. While the FBI was known to be using facial recognition software, the new report reveals the scope of the program.
The investigation gave some long-awaited answers to the EFF, which previously sought information about the NGI program through a FOIA request. Lynch wrote that, in addition to the revelations about just how many photos the FBI has access to, the agency "has been hiding this fact from the public--in flagrant violation of federal law and agency policy--for years."
The FBI uses its photo database, as well as those of other agencies including the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), to cross-reference images of criminal suspects. But the wide scope of the program raises questions about its level of accuracy.
Lynch wrote:
The FBI has conducted only very limited testing to ensure the accuracy of NGI's face recognition capabilities. And it has not taken any steps to determine whether the face recognition systems of its external partners--states and other federal agencies--are sufficiently accurate to prevent innocent people from being identified as criminal suspects. As we know from previous research, face recognition is notoriously inaccurate across the board and may also misidentify African Americans and ethnic minorities, young people, and women at higher rates than whites, older people, and men, respectively.
The FBI "did not specify how often incorrect matches were returned," the report states, adding that there was no information available about the rate of false positives.
As Lynch explained to the Guardian, detailed facial recognition information collected from driver's licenses is typically kept for cases of identity theft. "Data that's being collected for one purpose is being used for a very different purpose and that's not the way we operate in our democratic system," she said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.