SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
No Excuse, Says Human Rights Lawyer, Obama Can Still Close Guantanamo
President undermined his own plan to shutter the notorious facility by agreeing to the "defense" bill
Nov 11, 2015
After President Barack Obama agreed on Tuesday to sign a $607 billion "defense" bill that undermines his own plan to shutter the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, media outlets sounded the death knell for hopes that the facility will close before his term ends in 2017.
But Omar Shakir, a Bertha fellow at the Center for Constitutional Rights, told Common Dreams that the president, in fact, still retains the ability to close the prison--and must act now to fulfill his repeated pledges.
"Obama has been able and continues to be able to transfer the men cleared for release by every security and intelligence agency," Shakir said over the phone from Guantanamo where he is meeting with clients. "It is in his power to accelerate the pace of periodic review boards. He has the ability through the Department of Justice to ensure that those who face trial do so in fair proceedings in federal court."
"Obama has failed to follow through with his campaign promises and commitments to close Guantanamo by taking concrete steps while in power to articulate and execute a vision," Shakir continued. "In the vacuum we have seen opportunistic politicians from both sides of the aisle using Guantanamo as a tool for their own purposes at the expense of the critical principles of due process and freedom, holding men without charge in indefinite detention without end."
The National Defense Authorization Act, which was overwhelmingly passed by the Senate on Tuesday, includes a ban on transferring men held in Guantanamo to U.S. prisons--a cornerstone of Obama's plan to shutter the facility. Some, however, have argued that the congressional ban on transfers to the U.S. is constitutionally invalid.
Of the 112 men who remain, 53 have been cleared for release--83 percent of them Yemeni. Meanwhile, 49 are awaiting clearance and currently going through the periodic review process. Ten are in the military commissions system, with 7 on trial and three convicted.
The U.S. has long claimed that the location of the Guantanamo prison in Cuba allows them to detain "War On Terror" prisoners without granting them due process or legal protections, including those against torture.
But Shakir emphasized that Obama's plan to transfer some of the men to U.S. soil would not fully address "the tragedy at the heart of Guantanamo."
In part, this is because it would still involve moving the men to the U.S. without formal charges being brought against them--in continuation of their indefinite detenion. What's more, they would still likely face a military commission--if and when they faced trial.
"On the point of transfer to the U.S., the U.S. wants to hold people in the U.S. without charge, indefinitely detain them, without any sort of due process," he said. "They would be placed in a black hole where they are not subject to any sort of legal process. These are people who have been held without charge for years on end. The plan would relocate people for another U.S. president."
"There is significant concern among many in Guantanamo about their ordeals continuing for years on end," Shakir continued. "Many have lived there for 14 years, not only not knowing why they're there, but also not knowing when they may exit. One can only imagine the torment and mental anguish caused by being told you have been cleared for release, but having no idea when you will be released, and knowing the control of your fate is not in your hands, but in the hands of political forces."
Indeed, the men detained at the prison have long protested their confinement using the tools at their disposal, including hunger strikes. While a long-standing U.S. media blackout makes it difficult to know just how many people are engaging in peaceful protest, Shakir said it is "well known" that long-term hunger strikes continue.
One of Shakir's clients, a Yemeni man Ghaleb Nasser Al-Bihani, has reportedly faced retaliation for participating in hunger strikes to protest his detention without charge or trial for 14 years--a third of his life.
"All I think about is the day my freedom will be given back to me, for it will be the day of my re-birth," Al-Bihani said in December 2013. "I want to become a father and hold my baby in my arms, and provide for my family and to my child."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
After President Barack Obama agreed on Tuesday to sign a $607 billion "defense" bill that undermines his own plan to shutter the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, media outlets sounded the death knell for hopes that the facility will close before his term ends in 2017.
But Omar Shakir, a Bertha fellow at the Center for Constitutional Rights, told Common Dreams that the president, in fact, still retains the ability to close the prison--and must act now to fulfill his repeated pledges.
"Obama has been able and continues to be able to transfer the men cleared for release by every security and intelligence agency," Shakir said over the phone from Guantanamo where he is meeting with clients. "It is in his power to accelerate the pace of periodic review boards. He has the ability through the Department of Justice to ensure that those who face trial do so in fair proceedings in federal court."
"Obama has failed to follow through with his campaign promises and commitments to close Guantanamo by taking concrete steps while in power to articulate and execute a vision," Shakir continued. "In the vacuum we have seen opportunistic politicians from both sides of the aisle using Guantanamo as a tool for their own purposes at the expense of the critical principles of due process and freedom, holding men without charge in indefinite detention without end."
The National Defense Authorization Act, which was overwhelmingly passed by the Senate on Tuesday, includes a ban on transferring men held in Guantanamo to U.S. prisons--a cornerstone of Obama's plan to shutter the facility. Some, however, have argued that the congressional ban on transfers to the U.S. is constitutionally invalid.
Of the 112 men who remain, 53 have been cleared for release--83 percent of them Yemeni. Meanwhile, 49 are awaiting clearance and currently going through the periodic review process. Ten are in the military commissions system, with 7 on trial and three convicted.
The U.S. has long claimed that the location of the Guantanamo prison in Cuba allows them to detain "War On Terror" prisoners without granting them due process or legal protections, including those against torture.
But Shakir emphasized that Obama's plan to transfer some of the men to U.S. soil would not fully address "the tragedy at the heart of Guantanamo."
In part, this is because it would still involve moving the men to the U.S. without formal charges being brought against them--in continuation of their indefinite detenion. What's more, they would still likely face a military commission--if and when they faced trial.
"On the point of transfer to the U.S., the U.S. wants to hold people in the U.S. without charge, indefinitely detain them, without any sort of due process," he said. "They would be placed in a black hole where they are not subject to any sort of legal process. These are people who have been held without charge for years on end. The plan would relocate people for another U.S. president."
"There is significant concern among many in Guantanamo about their ordeals continuing for years on end," Shakir continued. "Many have lived there for 14 years, not only not knowing why they're there, but also not knowing when they may exit. One can only imagine the torment and mental anguish caused by being told you have been cleared for release, but having no idea when you will be released, and knowing the control of your fate is not in your hands, but in the hands of political forces."
Indeed, the men detained at the prison have long protested their confinement using the tools at their disposal, including hunger strikes. While a long-standing U.S. media blackout makes it difficult to know just how many people are engaging in peaceful protest, Shakir said it is "well known" that long-term hunger strikes continue.
One of Shakir's clients, a Yemeni man Ghaleb Nasser Al-Bihani, has reportedly faced retaliation for participating in hunger strikes to protest his detention without charge or trial for 14 years--a third of his life.
"All I think about is the day my freedom will be given back to me, for it will be the day of my re-birth," Al-Bihani said in December 2013. "I want to become a father and hold my baby in my arms, and provide for my family and to my child."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
After President Barack Obama agreed on Tuesday to sign a $607 billion "defense" bill that undermines his own plan to shutter the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, media outlets sounded the death knell for hopes that the facility will close before his term ends in 2017.
But Omar Shakir, a Bertha fellow at the Center for Constitutional Rights, told Common Dreams that the president, in fact, still retains the ability to close the prison--and must act now to fulfill his repeated pledges.
"Obama has been able and continues to be able to transfer the men cleared for release by every security and intelligence agency," Shakir said over the phone from Guantanamo where he is meeting with clients. "It is in his power to accelerate the pace of periodic review boards. He has the ability through the Department of Justice to ensure that those who face trial do so in fair proceedings in federal court."
"Obama has failed to follow through with his campaign promises and commitments to close Guantanamo by taking concrete steps while in power to articulate and execute a vision," Shakir continued. "In the vacuum we have seen opportunistic politicians from both sides of the aisle using Guantanamo as a tool for their own purposes at the expense of the critical principles of due process and freedom, holding men without charge in indefinite detention without end."
The National Defense Authorization Act, which was overwhelmingly passed by the Senate on Tuesday, includes a ban on transferring men held in Guantanamo to U.S. prisons--a cornerstone of Obama's plan to shutter the facility. Some, however, have argued that the congressional ban on transfers to the U.S. is constitutionally invalid.
Of the 112 men who remain, 53 have been cleared for release--83 percent of them Yemeni. Meanwhile, 49 are awaiting clearance and currently going through the periodic review process. Ten are in the military commissions system, with 7 on trial and three convicted.
The U.S. has long claimed that the location of the Guantanamo prison in Cuba allows them to detain "War On Terror" prisoners without granting them due process or legal protections, including those against torture.
But Shakir emphasized that Obama's plan to transfer some of the men to U.S. soil would not fully address "the tragedy at the heart of Guantanamo."
In part, this is because it would still involve moving the men to the U.S. without formal charges being brought against them--in continuation of their indefinite detenion. What's more, they would still likely face a military commission--if and when they faced trial.
"On the point of transfer to the U.S., the U.S. wants to hold people in the U.S. without charge, indefinitely detain them, without any sort of due process," he said. "They would be placed in a black hole where they are not subject to any sort of legal process. These are people who have been held without charge for years on end. The plan would relocate people for another U.S. president."
"There is significant concern among many in Guantanamo about their ordeals continuing for years on end," Shakir continued. "Many have lived there for 14 years, not only not knowing why they're there, but also not knowing when they may exit. One can only imagine the torment and mental anguish caused by being told you have been cleared for release, but having no idea when you will be released, and knowing the control of your fate is not in your hands, but in the hands of political forces."
Indeed, the men detained at the prison have long protested their confinement using the tools at their disposal, including hunger strikes. While a long-standing U.S. media blackout makes it difficult to know just how many people are engaging in peaceful protest, Shakir said it is "well known" that long-term hunger strikes continue.
One of Shakir's clients, a Yemeni man Ghaleb Nasser Al-Bihani, has reportedly faced retaliation for participating in hunger strikes to protest his detention without charge or trial for 14 years--a third of his life.
"All I think about is the day my freedom will be given back to me, for it will be the day of my re-birth," Al-Bihani said in December 2013. "I want to become a father and hold my baby in my arms, and provide for my family and to my child."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.