Judge Sanctions Border Patrol Over Evidence Destruction in Abuse Case
Agents reportedly destroyed footage of holding areas in wake of lawsuit alleging inhumane treatment
A federal judge in Arizona has slapped the U.S. Border Patrol with sanctions after he found that agents had "negligently" or "willfully" destroyed evidence of alleged inhumane treatment of immigrants in Tucson detention centers.
Videotapes from Tucson sector stations were erased or recorded over in the midst of an ongoing civil rights lawsuit filed against the Border Patrol by a coalition of human rights groups who say agents routinely hold immigrants in cold, dirty, and inhumane cells. The suit (pdf) was filed in June on behalf of three plaintiffs who said detainees are denied food, water, and medical treatment, and held for extended periods of time in facilities which the Border Patrol claims are designed for short term detention.
Judge David C. Bury, who issued the sanctions Monday, in August had ordered the Border Patrol not to destroy footage of detainee holding areas--but agents did not comply.
"The Court concludes the destruction of the video-tape recordings made prior to this Court's August 14, 2015, Order was, at best, negligent and was certainly willful. Defendants provide no explanation why, in response to Plaintiffs' notifications regarding litigation, the Defendants did not undertake the efforts initiated in response to the Court's August 14 Order," Bury wrote.
Agents will now have to produce all remaining videos from the past several months within two weeks.
James Lyall, an attorney with the ACLU, one of the groups which filed the lawsuit, told the Associated Press that a judge issuing sanctions against a government agency is a rare move.
"We believe the destroyed video would have shown the Border Patrol failing to follow its policies and subjecting countless individuals, including our clients, to inhumane and unconstitutional conditions. So the court was right to impose sanctions for the agency's deliberate destruction of key evidence," Lyall said.
The Border Patrol's Tucson sector covers 262 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border. According to the suit, it is one of the most heavily enforced regions. The detention centers are known colloquially as "iceboxes" for their intentionally low temperatures. The lawsuit states:
During their confinement, Plaintiffs and many others like them--men, women, and children--have been subjected to inhumane and punitive conditions. They have been packed into overcrowded and filthy holding cells with the lights glaring day and night; stripped of outer layers of clothing and forced to suffer in brutally cold temperatures; deprived of beds, bedding, and sleep; denied adequate food, water, medicine and medical care, and basic sanitation and hygiene items such as soap, sufficient toilet paper, sanitary napkins, diapers, and showers; and held incommunicado in these conditions for days.
Named in the suit are facilities throughout the state, including Bisbee, Casa Grande, Douglas, Nogales, Tucson, and other cities.
"There is no justification for these savage policies," Lyall wrote in a blog post in June. "The systemic mistreatment of individuals in Border Patrol custody is both cruel and unconstitutional. We hope that this lawsuit will be the first step to holding Border Patrol accountable for this cruelty and abuse."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A federal judge in Arizona has slapped the U.S. Border Patrol with sanctions after he found that agents had "negligently" or "willfully" destroyed evidence of alleged inhumane treatment of immigrants in Tucson detention centers.
Videotapes from Tucson sector stations were erased or recorded over in the midst of an ongoing civil rights lawsuit filed against the Border Patrol by a coalition of human rights groups who say agents routinely hold immigrants in cold, dirty, and inhumane cells. The suit (pdf) was filed in June on behalf of three plaintiffs who said detainees are denied food, water, and medical treatment, and held for extended periods of time in facilities which the Border Patrol claims are designed for short term detention.
Judge David C. Bury, who issued the sanctions Monday, in August had ordered the Border Patrol not to destroy footage of detainee holding areas--but agents did not comply.
"The Court concludes the destruction of the video-tape recordings made prior to this Court's August 14, 2015, Order was, at best, negligent and was certainly willful. Defendants provide no explanation why, in response to Plaintiffs' notifications regarding litigation, the Defendants did not undertake the efforts initiated in response to the Court's August 14 Order," Bury wrote.
Agents will now have to produce all remaining videos from the past several months within two weeks.
James Lyall, an attorney with the ACLU, one of the groups which filed the lawsuit, told the Associated Press that a judge issuing sanctions against a government agency is a rare move.
"We believe the destroyed video would have shown the Border Patrol failing to follow its policies and subjecting countless individuals, including our clients, to inhumane and unconstitutional conditions. So the court was right to impose sanctions for the agency's deliberate destruction of key evidence," Lyall said.
The Border Patrol's Tucson sector covers 262 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border. According to the suit, it is one of the most heavily enforced regions. The detention centers are known colloquially as "iceboxes" for their intentionally low temperatures. The lawsuit states:
During their confinement, Plaintiffs and many others like them--men, women, and children--have been subjected to inhumane and punitive conditions. They have been packed into overcrowded and filthy holding cells with the lights glaring day and night; stripped of outer layers of clothing and forced to suffer in brutally cold temperatures; deprived of beds, bedding, and sleep; denied adequate food, water, medicine and medical care, and basic sanitation and hygiene items such as soap, sufficient toilet paper, sanitary napkins, diapers, and showers; and held incommunicado in these conditions for days.
Named in the suit are facilities throughout the state, including Bisbee, Casa Grande, Douglas, Nogales, Tucson, and other cities.
"There is no justification for these savage policies," Lyall wrote in a blog post in June. "The systemic mistreatment of individuals in Border Patrol custody is both cruel and unconstitutional. We hope that this lawsuit will be the first step to holding Border Patrol accountable for this cruelty and abuse."
A federal judge in Arizona has slapped the U.S. Border Patrol with sanctions after he found that agents had "negligently" or "willfully" destroyed evidence of alleged inhumane treatment of immigrants in Tucson detention centers.
Videotapes from Tucson sector stations were erased or recorded over in the midst of an ongoing civil rights lawsuit filed against the Border Patrol by a coalition of human rights groups who say agents routinely hold immigrants in cold, dirty, and inhumane cells. The suit (pdf) was filed in June on behalf of three plaintiffs who said detainees are denied food, water, and medical treatment, and held for extended periods of time in facilities which the Border Patrol claims are designed for short term detention.
Judge David C. Bury, who issued the sanctions Monday, in August had ordered the Border Patrol not to destroy footage of detainee holding areas--but agents did not comply.
"The Court concludes the destruction of the video-tape recordings made prior to this Court's August 14, 2015, Order was, at best, negligent and was certainly willful. Defendants provide no explanation why, in response to Plaintiffs' notifications regarding litigation, the Defendants did not undertake the efforts initiated in response to the Court's August 14 Order," Bury wrote.
Agents will now have to produce all remaining videos from the past several months within two weeks.
James Lyall, an attorney with the ACLU, one of the groups which filed the lawsuit, told the Associated Press that a judge issuing sanctions against a government agency is a rare move.
"We believe the destroyed video would have shown the Border Patrol failing to follow its policies and subjecting countless individuals, including our clients, to inhumane and unconstitutional conditions. So the court was right to impose sanctions for the agency's deliberate destruction of key evidence," Lyall said.
The Border Patrol's Tucson sector covers 262 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border. According to the suit, it is one of the most heavily enforced regions. The detention centers are known colloquially as "iceboxes" for their intentionally low temperatures. The lawsuit states:
During their confinement, Plaintiffs and many others like them--men, women, and children--have been subjected to inhumane and punitive conditions. They have been packed into overcrowded and filthy holding cells with the lights glaring day and night; stripped of outer layers of clothing and forced to suffer in brutally cold temperatures; deprived of beds, bedding, and sleep; denied adequate food, water, medicine and medical care, and basic sanitation and hygiene items such as soap, sufficient toilet paper, sanitary napkins, diapers, and showers; and held incommunicado in these conditions for days.
Named in the suit are facilities throughout the state, including Bisbee, Casa Grande, Douglas, Nogales, Tucson, and other cities.
"There is no justification for these savage policies," Lyall wrote in a blog post in June. "The systemic mistreatment of individuals in Border Patrol custody is both cruel and unconstitutional. We hope that this lawsuit will be the first step to holding Border Patrol accountable for this cruelty and abuse."