Obama Administration Rebuked for Turning Its Back on Syrian Refugees
Rights campaigners say president's pledge to take in 10,000 Syrian refugees falls shamefully short of what's needed
Amid a mounting human rights emergency, the Obama administration said Thursday that it will admit 10,000 Syrian refugees this fiscal year--a number that was criticized by rights campaigners as shamefully low, especially given the role of the United States in stoking the crisis.
Facing criticism for its lagging humanitarian response so far, the administration sought to frame the commitment as a significant boost. And indeed it does constitute an increase, as the U.S. has admitted less than 1,500 Syrian refugees since the country's conflict began in 2011.
However, the number falls well below commitments of other countries that are far smaller. Germany has committed to accepting up to 800,000 refugees by the end of this year and Venezuela has committed to 20,000. Of the estimated four million Syrians who have fled their country, the vast majority of them are in Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, and Iraq. Meanwhile, roughly 7.6 million Syrians are internally displaced.
What's more, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest emphasized at a briefing on Thursday that Obama is not planning to ease the cumbersome background and medical checks that leave refugees in legal limbo for up to two years.
"Refugees go through the most robust security process of anybody who's contemplating travel to the United States. Refugees have to be screened by the National Counter Terrorism Center, by the F.B.I. Terrorist Screening Center," said Earnest. "They go through databases that are maintained by D.H.S., the Department of Defense and the intelligence community. There is biographical and biometric information that is collected about these individuals."
Sarah Margon, the Washington director of Human Rights Watch, told the New York Times that such "bureaucratic impediments" mean that the U.S. is not providing immediate sanctuary--or anything close.
"This is not leadership, it is barely a token contribution given the size and scale of the global emergency," said Eleanor Acer of Human Rights First, in a statement released Thursday. "The administration's announcement that it will commit to take in at least 10,000 Syrian refugees is far too little and is only a drop in the bucket toward providing protection to the more than 4 million Syrians who have fled their country due to horrific violence and persecution."
The aid group International Rescue Committee is circulating a petition for the the U.S. to resettle at least 65,000 Syrian refugees by 2016, and it has so far garnered 70,000 signatures. And Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who signed a letter in May from 14 senators urging Obama to admit more refugees, told the Times that the president's number "has to be higher."
Many have argued for the U.S. to simply taken in as many people as are in need, given the scope of the crisis. "No more should we allow pieces of paper to determine whether people deserve to live and improve their circumstances or die in violence and squalor," journalist and activist Sonali Kolhatkar recently declared.
In fact, James Paul, author of Syria Unmasked, argued on Friday that the U.S. and Europe played a key role in driving the crisis Syrians face.
"Official discourse in Europe and the United States frames the civil wars and economic turmoil in terms of fanaticism, corruption, dictatorship, economic failures and other causes for which Western governments and publics believe they have no responsibility," he said. "The Western leaders and media stay silent about the military intervention and regime change, interventions that have torn the refugees' homelands apart and resulted in civil war, state collapse and extremely violent conditions lasting for long periods."
In addition, Obama's policy announcement did not touch on the numerous people fleeing war and poverty in countries beyond Syria including: Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Pakistan, Eritrea, Somalia, and Nigeria.
Meanwhile, the administration faces its own humanitarian crisis on U.S. soil, where authorities have been incarcerating predominantly Latin American refugees and asylum seekers, including mothers detained with their children.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Amid a mounting human rights emergency, the Obama administration said Thursday that it will admit 10,000 Syrian refugees this fiscal year--a number that was criticized by rights campaigners as shamefully low, especially given the role of the United States in stoking the crisis.
Facing criticism for its lagging humanitarian response so far, the administration sought to frame the commitment as a significant boost. And indeed it does constitute an increase, as the U.S. has admitted less than 1,500 Syrian refugees since the country's conflict began in 2011.
However, the number falls well below commitments of other countries that are far smaller. Germany has committed to accepting up to 800,000 refugees by the end of this year and Venezuela has committed to 20,000. Of the estimated four million Syrians who have fled their country, the vast majority of them are in Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, and Iraq. Meanwhile, roughly 7.6 million Syrians are internally displaced.
What's more, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest emphasized at a briefing on Thursday that Obama is not planning to ease the cumbersome background and medical checks that leave refugees in legal limbo for up to two years.
"Refugees go through the most robust security process of anybody who's contemplating travel to the United States. Refugees have to be screened by the National Counter Terrorism Center, by the F.B.I. Terrorist Screening Center," said Earnest. "They go through databases that are maintained by D.H.S., the Department of Defense and the intelligence community. There is biographical and biometric information that is collected about these individuals."
Sarah Margon, the Washington director of Human Rights Watch, told the New York Times that such "bureaucratic impediments" mean that the U.S. is not providing immediate sanctuary--or anything close.
"This is not leadership, it is barely a token contribution given the size and scale of the global emergency," said Eleanor Acer of Human Rights First, in a statement released Thursday. "The administration's announcement that it will commit to take in at least 10,000 Syrian refugees is far too little and is only a drop in the bucket toward providing protection to the more than 4 million Syrians who have fled their country due to horrific violence and persecution."
The aid group International Rescue Committee is circulating a petition for the the U.S. to resettle at least 65,000 Syrian refugees by 2016, and it has so far garnered 70,000 signatures. And Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who signed a letter in May from 14 senators urging Obama to admit more refugees, told the Times that the president's number "has to be higher."
Many have argued for the U.S. to simply taken in as many people as are in need, given the scope of the crisis. "No more should we allow pieces of paper to determine whether people deserve to live and improve their circumstances or die in violence and squalor," journalist and activist Sonali Kolhatkar recently declared.
In fact, James Paul, author of Syria Unmasked, argued on Friday that the U.S. and Europe played a key role in driving the crisis Syrians face.
"Official discourse in Europe and the United States frames the civil wars and economic turmoil in terms of fanaticism, corruption, dictatorship, economic failures and other causes for which Western governments and publics believe they have no responsibility," he said. "The Western leaders and media stay silent about the military intervention and regime change, interventions that have torn the refugees' homelands apart and resulted in civil war, state collapse and extremely violent conditions lasting for long periods."
In addition, Obama's policy announcement did not touch on the numerous people fleeing war and poverty in countries beyond Syria including: Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Pakistan, Eritrea, Somalia, and Nigeria.
Meanwhile, the administration faces its own humanitarian crisis on U.S. soil, where authorities have been incarcerating predominantly Latin American refugees and asylum seekers, including mothers detained with their children.
Amid a mounting human rights emergency, the Obama administration said Thursday that it will admit 10,000 Syrian refugees this fiscal year--a number that was criticized by rights campaigners as shamefully low, especially given the role of the United States in stoking the crisis.
Facing criticism for its lagging humanitarian response so far, the administration sought to frame the commitment as a significant boost. And indeed it does constitute an increase, as the U.S. has admitted less than 1,500 Syrian refugees since the country's conflict began in 2011.
However, the number falls well below commitments of other countries that are far smaller. Germany has committed to accepting up to 800,000 refugees by the end of this year and Venezuela has committed to 20,000. Of the estimated four million Syrians who have fled their country, the vast majority of them are in Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, and Iraq. Meanwhile, roughly 7.6 million Syrians are internally displaced.
What's more, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest emphasized at a briefing on Thursday that Obama is not planning to ease the cumbersome background and medical checks that leave refugees in legal limbo for up to two years.
"Refugees go through the most robust security process of anybody who's contemplating travel to the United States. Refugees have to be screened by the National Counter Terrorism Center, by the F.B.I. Terrorist Screening Center," said Earnest. "They go through databases that are maintained by D.H.S., the Department of Defense and the intelligence community. There is biographical and biometric information that is collected about these individuals."
Sarah Margon, the Washington director of Human Rights Watch, told the New York Times that such "bureaucratic impediments" mean that the U.S. is not providing immediate sanctuary--or anything close.
"This is not leadership, it is barely a token contribution given the size and scale of the global emergency," said Eleanor Acer of Human Rights First, in a statement released Thursday. "The administration's announcement that it will commit to take in at least 10,000 Syrian refugees is far too little and is only a drop in the bucket toward providing protection to the more than 4 million Syrians who have fled their country due to horrific violence and persecution."
The aid group International Rescue Committee is circulating a petition for the the U.S. to resettle at least 65,000 Syrian refugees by 2016, and it has so far garnered 70,000 signatures. And Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who signed a letter in May from 14 senators urging Obama to admit more refugees, told the Times that the president's number "has to be higher."
Many have argued for the U.S. to simply taken in as many people as are in need, given the scope of the crisis. "No more should we allow pieces of paper to determine whether people deserve to live and improve their circumstances or die in violence and squalor," journalist and activist Sonali Kolhatkar recently declared.
In fact, James Paul, author of Syria Unmasked, argued on Friday that the U.S. and Europe played a key role in driving the crisis Syrians face.
"Official discourse in Europe and the United States frames the civil wars and economic turmoil in terms of fanaticism, corruption, dictatorship, economic failures and other causes for which Western governments and publics believe they have no responsibility," he said. "The Western leaders and media stay silent about the military intervention and regime change, interventions that have torn the refugees' homelands apart and resulted in civil war, state collapse and extremely violent conditions lasting for long periods."
In addition, Obama's policy announcement did not touch on the numerous people fleeing war and poverty in countries beyond Syria including: Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Pakistan, Eritrea, Somalia, and Nigeria.
Meanwhile, the administration faces its own humanitarian crisis on U.S. soil, where authorities have been incarcerating predominantly Latin American refugees and asylum seekers, including mothers detained with their children.