

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Marking a major departure for a city known for its over-reliance on cars, the Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday evening approved a 20-year transportation plan that aims to encourage walking, biking, and public transit over automobiles.
"The car capital of America is officially changing its tune," wrote LA Weekly.
The 'Mobility Plan 2035,' described in the LA Times as "a sweeping policy shift," calls for hundreds of miles of new bicycle lanes, bus-only lanes, and other road redesigns throughout the city. It targets about 10 percent of the city's major streets for lane reductions.
ABC 7-Los Angeles reports that about 47 percent of trips taken in the city are less than 3 miles, and of those trips, 84 percent are taken by car. The city's Environmental Impact Report suggested the plan, which passed the council 12-2, would reduce the amount of car travel by 1.7 million miles a day.
According to the LA Times, the plan (pdf) "also seeks to cut the fatality rate from traffic collisions to zero within 20 years, in part by keeping cars within the speed limits."
Responses to the plan have been mixed. In advance of the vote, the MoveLA coalition said the plan was "excellent" because it "addresses the adverse health and environmental impacts of air pollution and climate change, and the question of how we can grow the city more sustainably."
"LA has been slow to join the worldwide movement to re-orient streets away from cars and back towards people and community life by prioritizing the safety of all road users and emphasizing the public right to use what are undeniably public spaces," MoveLA's Gloria Ohland wrote on Monday.
The plan also "prioritizes investments in areas where car ownership rates are low or the number of bike and pedestrian collisions are high so as to serve the areas of greatest need," Ohland noted.
Editorializing in favor of the plan earlier this week, the Times wrote: "It's time for L.A. to shed its traditional automobile-centric approach and evolve into a modern, multimodal city."
At Tuesday's hearing, public testimony was limited to 20 minutes, and was reportedly heavily in favor of plan approval.
But the Los Feliz Ledger reports that one group of opponents has already announced that it will sue the city over the plan, claiming it will increase traffic congestion and hinder the movement of emergency vehicles.
On the other hand, pro-transit Streetsblog LA reminded readers: "Ultimately, it is just a plan."
Noting that a 1999 plan had similar language and goals but failed to materialize, Streetsblog continued, "Communities will need to organize and press to translate the Mobility Plan's multimodal vision into improved safety and broader mobility choices in L.A. neighborhoods."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Marking a major departure for a city known for its over-reliance on cars, the Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday evening approved a 20-year transportation plan that aims to encourage walking, biking, and public transit over automobiles.
"The car capital of America is officially changing its tune," wrote LA Weekly.
The 'Mobility Plan 2035,' described in the LA Times as "a sweeping policy shift," calls for hundreds of miles of new bicycle lanes, bus-only lanes, and other road redesigns throughout the city. It targets about 10 percent of the city's major streets for lane reductions.
ABC 7-Los Angeles reports that about 47 percent of trips taken in the city are less than 3 miles, and of those trips, 84 percent are taken by car. The city's Environmental Impact Report suggested the plan, which passed the council 12-2, would reduce the amount of car travel by 1.7 million miles a day.
According to the LA Times, the plan (pdf) "also seeks to cut the fatality rate from traffic collisions to zero within 20 years, in part by keeping cars within the speed limits."
Responses to the plan have been mixed. In advance of the vote, the MoveLA coalition said the plan was "excellent" because it "addresses the adverse health and environmental impacts of air pollution and climate change, and the question of how we can grow the city more sustainably."
"LA has been slow to join the worldwide movement to re-orient streets away from cars and back towards people and community life by prioritizing the safety of all road users and emphasizing the public right to use what are undeniably public spaces," MoveLA's Gloria Ohland wrote on Monday.
The plan also "prioritizes investments in areas where car ownership rates are low or the number of bike and pedestrian collisions are high so as to serve the areas of greatest need," Ohland noted.
Editorializing in favor of the plan earlier this week, the Times wrote: "It's time for L.A. to shed its traditional automobile-centric approach and evolve into a modern, multimodal city."
At Tuesday's hearing, public testimony was limited to 20 minutes, and was reportedly heavily in favor of plan approval.
But the Los Feliz Ledger reports that one group of opponents has already announced that it will sue the city over the plan, claiming it will increase traffic congestion and hinder the movement of emergency vehicles.
On the other hand, pro-transit Streetsblog LA reminded readers: "Ultimately, it is just a plan."
Noting that a 1999 plan had similar language and goals but failed to materialize, Streetsblog continued, "Communities will need to organize and press to translate the Mobility Plan's multimodal vision into improved safety and broader mobility choices in L.A. neighborhoods."
Marking a major departure for a city known for its over-reliance on cars, the Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday evening approved a 20-year transportation plan that aims to encourage walking, biking, and public transit over automobiles.
"The car capital of America is officially changing its tune," wrote LA Weekly.
The 'Mobility Plan 2035,' described in the LA Times as "a sweeping policy shift," calls for hundreds of miles of new bicycle lanes, bus-only lanes, and other road redesigns throughout the city. It targets about 10 percent of the city's major streets for lane reductions.
ABC 7-Los Angeles reports that about 47 percent of trips taken in the city are less than 3 miles, and of those trips, 84 percent are taken by car. The city's Environmental Impact Report suggested the plan, which passed the council 12-2, would reduce the amount of car travel by 1.7 million miles a day.
According to the LA Times, the plan (pdf) "also seeks to cut the fatality rate from traffic collisions to zero within 20 years, in part by keeping cars within the speed limits."
Responses to the plan have been mixed. In advance of the vote, the MoveLA coalition said the plan was "excellent" because it "addresses the adverse health and environmental impacts of air pollution and climate change, and the question of how we can grow the city more sustainably."
"LA has been slow to join the worldwide movement to re-orient streets away from cars and back towards people and community life by prioritizing the safety of all road users and emphasizing the public right to use what are undeniably public spaces," MoveLA's Gloria Ohland wrote on Monday.
The plan also "prioritizes investments in areas where car ownership rates are low or the number of bike and pedestrian collisions are high so as to serve the areas of greatest need," Ohland noted.
Editorializing in favor of the plan earlier this week, the Times wrote: "It's time for L.A. to shed its traditional automobile-centric approach and evolve into a modern, multimodal city."
At Tuesday's hearing, public testimony was limited to 20 minutes, and was reportedly heavily in favor of plan approval.
But the Los Feliz Ledger reports that one group of opponents has already announced that it will sue the city over the plan, claiming it will increase traffic congestion and hinder the movement of emergency vehicles.
On the other hand, pro-transit Streetsblog LA reminded readers: "Ultimately, it is just a plan."
Noting that a 1999 plan had similar language and goals but failed to materialize, Streetsblog continued, "Communities will need to organize and press to translate the Mobility Plan's multimodal vision into improved safety and broader mobility choices in L.A. neighborhoods."