SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Ignoring Public Opposition, Japanese Court Rejects Residents' Bid to Block Nuclear Restart
Decision comes four years after ongoing Fukushima disaster first struck
Apr 22, 2015
Striking a blow to local residents opposed to nuclear power, a Japanese court on Wednesday green-lighted the reopening of the Sendai power station, in a ruling that could clear the way for the return of this widely-opposed energy source four years after the Fukushima crisis began.
In the ruling, the Kagoshima District Court rejected a formal attempt by residents to prevent the restarting of two reactors at the plant. The residents had cited safety concerns.
The outcome diverged from a separate court decision last week, in which judges ruled in favor of residents seeking an injunction against the restart of reactors at the Takahama plant.
According to Reuters, local residents who had formally requested that the plant not be restarted gathered outside the Kagoshima court and "let out a collective sigh when the decision was announced."
Hiroyuki Kawai, the lead lawyer for the plaintiffs, denounced the decision: "We will not give in, we will continue fighting. We will not let our emotions be swayed by any short-term results and we will fight until we get rid of all nuclear reactors in Japan."
According to the Guardian, Wednesday's court decision "leaves Kyushu Electric Power, the operator of Sendai nuclear power plant, with just one more regulatory obstacle to overcome before it can restart the two reactors, possibly as early as June."
If the Sendai plant were to reopen, it would mark the first restart since the industry was halted nation-wide following the Fukushima meltdown.
The majority of people in Japan oppose the restart of Japan's nuclear power plants.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Striking a blow to local residents opposed to nuclear power, a Japanese court on Wednesday green-lighted the reopening of the Sendai power station, in a ruling that could clear the way for the return of this widely-opposed energy source four years after the Fukushima crisis began.
In the ruling, the Kagoshima District Court rejected a formal attempt by residents to prevent the restarting of two reactors at the plant. The residents had cited safety concerns.
The outcome diverged from a separate court decision last week, in which judges ruled in favor of residents seeking an injunction against the restart of reactors at the Takahama plant.
According to Reuters, local residents who had formally requested that the plant not be restarted gathered outside the Kagoshima court and "let out a collective sigh when the decision was announced."
Hiroyuki Kawai, the lead lawyer for the plaintiffs, denounced the decision: "We will not give in, we will continue fighting. We will not let our emotions be swayed by any short-term results and we will fight until we get rid of all nuclear reactors in Japan."
According to the Guardian, Wednesday's court decision "leaves Kyushu Electric Power, the operator of Sendai nuclear power plant, with just one more regulatory obstacle to overcome before it can restart the two reactors, possibly as early as June."
If the Sendai plant were to reopen, it would mark the first restart since the industry was halted nation-wide following the Fukushima meltdown.
The majority of people in Japan oppose the restart of Japan's nuclear power plants.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
Striking a blow to local residents opposed to nuclear power, a Japanese court on Wednesday green-lighted the reopening of the Sendai power station, in a ruling that could clear the way for the return of this widely-opposed energy source four years after the Fukushima crisis began.
In the ruling, the Kagoshima District Court rejected a formal attempt by residents to prevent the restarting of two reactors at the plant. The residents had cited safety concerns.
The outcome diverged from a separate court decision last week, in which judges ruled in favor of residents seeking an injunction against the restart of reactors at the Takahama plant.
According to Reuters, local residents who had formally requested that the plant not be restarted gathered outside the Kagoshima court and "let out a collective sigh when the decision was announced."
Hiroyuki Kawai, the lead lawyer for the plaintiffs, denounced the decision: "We will not give in, we will continue fighting. We will not let our emotions be swayed by any short-term results and we will fight until we get rid of all nuclear reactors in Japan."
According to the Guardian, Wednesday's court decision "leaves Kyushu Electric Power, the operator of Sendai nuclear power plant, with just one more regulatory obstacle to overcome before it can restart the two reactors, possibly as early as June."
If the Sendai plant were to reopen, it would mark the first restart since the industry was halted nation-wide following the Fukushima meltdown.
The majority of people in Japan oppose the restart of Japan's nuclear power plants.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.