SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
With Massive Boycott of Standardized Tests, New York Students Take Stand Against Corporate Education
'These refusals are meant to protest a system that is currently failing our children and educators.'
Apr 17, 2015
Tens of thousands of students in New York boycotted the annual state-mandated English Language Arts exams this week in a grassroots challenge to Governor Andrew Cuomo's controversial education agenda.
Organizers, including educational advocacy group United to Counter the Core, said at least 155,000 students opted out of the tests on Thursday, with only half of the state's districts tallied. That figure is up from 112,763 on Wednesday--and up from 49,000 last year. Testing began on Tuesday.
The revolt is in response to what parents, students, and activists say is a political takeover of educational standards--seen at the national level as well--that pushes a focus on standardized exams and a Common Core curriculum, developed by a secretive for-profit company, that compromises learning for test preparation.
In late March, Cuomo approved a budget that included many divisive revisions to the state education agenda, including teacher evaluations based partly on test scores, which critics say take too long , are too vague to be accurate, and fail to measure real learning.
Investigative journalist Juan Gonzalez explained the concerns over the increased focus on testing in his column for the New York Daily News:
The politicians created a test that says all schools are failing, not just the ones in the big cities, then declare a crisis, so they can close more neighborhood schools, launch more charter schools, and target more teachers for firing.
Meanwhile, the private company that fashioned this new test, Pearson, insists on total secrecy over its content.
As Democracy Now! reports, in January, as Cuomo held town hall meetings with parents in New York who voiced a number of frustrations over the proposed curriculum, special education teacher Jia Lee testified before U.S. Congress about the growing number of parents opting their children out of the yearly exams.
"In New York state, at least, these tests have changed from year to year," Lee said during her testimony. "When parents and educators have voiced concerns, they've been accused of coddling. I want to challenge that assumption.
"The great crime is that the focus on testing has taken valuable resources and time away from programming, social studies, arts and physical education, special education services and ELL [English language learners] programs," Lee said.
Toni Smith-Thompson, a New York parent whose child opted out of the tests this week, spoke with Democracy Now! on Friday, explaining why this year's protest reached its unprecedented size.
"[W]ith the addition of these high stakes attached to the teacher evaluations, really just took it over the top," Smith-Thompson said. "Kids started talking about, 'If I fail, my teacher will get fired.' And kids should not be put in that position."
Once Smith-Thompson and other parents in her district "had the information about what was in the tests, the length of the tests, like eight hours--plus, you know, for most schools, months of test prep--it was a no-brainer," she continued.
Cindy Rubino, a parent in Lakeland whose children also boycotted the tests, told USA Today that she was "thrilled" with the turnout.
"I do believe this is a historic day in New York state, as we try to regain local control over the education of our kids," Rubino said. "These refusals are meant to protest a system that is currently failing our children and educators."
A new round of testing, focused on math, is set to begin next Tuesday.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Tens of thousands of students in New York boycotted the annual state-mandated English Language Arts exams this week in a grassroots challenge to Governor Andrew Cuomo's controversial education agenda.
Organizers, including educational advocacy group United to Counter the Core, said at least 155,000 students opted out of the tests on Thursday, with only half of the state's districts tallied. That figure is up from 112,763 on Wednesday--and up from 49,000 last year. Testing began on Tuesday.
The revolt is in response to what parents, students, and activists say is a political takeover of educational standards--seen at the national level as well--that pushes a focus on standardized exams and a Common Core curriculum, developed by a secretive for-profit company, that compromises learning for test preparation.
In late March, Cuomo approved a budget that included many divisive revisions to the state education agenda, including teacher evaluations based partly on test scores, which critics say take too long , are too vague to be accurate, and fail to measure real learning.
Investigative journalist Juan Gonzalez explained the concerns over the increased focus on testing in his column for the New York Daily News:
The politicians created a test that says all schools are failing, not just the ones in the big cities, then declare a crisis, so they can close more neighborhood schools, launch more charter schools, and target more teachers for firing.
Meanwhile, the private company that fashioned this new test, Pearson, insists on total secrecy over its content.
As Democracy Now! reports, in January, as Cuomo held town hall meetings with parents in New York who voiced a number of frustrations over the proposed curriculum, special education teacher Jia Lee testified before U.S. Congress about the growing number of parents opting their children out of the yearly exams.
"In New York state, at least, these tests have changed from year to year," Lee said during her testimony. "When parents and educators have voiced concerns, they've been accused of coddling. I want to challenge that assumption.
"The great crime is that the focus on testing has taken valuable resources and time away from programming, social studies, arts and physical education, special education services and ELL [English language learners] programs," Lee said.
Toni Smith-Thompson, a New York parent whose child opted out of the tests this week, spoke with Democracy Now! on Friday, explaining why this year's protest reached its unprecedented size.
"[W]ith the addition of these high stakes attached to the teacher evaluations, really just took it over the top," Smith-Thompson said. "Kids started talking about, 'If I fail, my teacher will get fired.' And kids should not be put in that position."
Once Smith-Thompson and other parents in her district "had the information about what was in the tests, the length of the tests, like eight hours--plus, you know, for most schools, months of test prep--it was a no-brainer," she continued.
Cindy Rubino, a parent in Lakeland whose children also boycotted the tests, told USA Today that she was "thrilled" with the turnout.
"I do believe this is a historic day in New York state, as we try to regain local control over the education of our kids," Rubino said. "These refusals are meant to protest a system that is currently failing our children and educators."
A new round of testing, focused on math, is set to begin next Tuesday.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Tens of thousands of students in New York boycotted the annual state-mandated English Language Arts exams this week in a grassroots challenge to Governor Andrew Cuomo's controversial education agenda.
Organizers, including educational advocacy group United to Counter the Core, said at least 155,000 students opted out of the tests on Thursday, with only half of the state's districts tallied. That figure is up from 112,763 on Wednesday--and up from 49,000 last year. Testing began on Tuesday.
The revolt is in response to what parents, students, and activists say is a political takeover of educational standards--seen at the national level as well--that pushes a focus on standardized exams and a Common Core curriculum, developed by a secretive for-profit company, that compromises learning for test preparation.
In late March, Cuomo approved a budget that included many divisive revisions to the state education agenda, including teacher evaluations based partly on test scores, which critics say take too long , are too vague to be accurate, and fail to measure real learning.
Investigative journalist Juan Gonzalez explained the concerns over the increased focus on testing in his column for the New York Daily News:
The politicians created a test that says all schools are failing, not just the ones in the big cities, then declare a crisis, so they can close more neighborhood schools, launch more charter schools, and target more teachers for firing.
Meanwhile, the private company that fashioned this new test, Pearson, insists on total secrecy over its content.
As Democracy Now! reports, in January, as Cuomo held town hall meetings with parents in New York who voiced a number of frustrations over the proposed curriculum, special education teacher Jia Lee testified before U.S. Congress about the growing number of parents opting their children out of the yearly exams.
"In New York state, at least, these tests have changed from year to year," Lee said during her testimony. "When parents and educators have voiced concerns, they've been accused of coddling. I want to challenge that assumption.
"The great crime is that the focus on testing has taken valuable resources and time away from programming, social studies, arts and physical education, special education services and ELL [English language learners] programs," Lee said.
Toni Smith-Thompson, a New York parent whose child opted out of the tests this week, spoke with Democracy Now! on Friday, explaining why this year's protest reached its unprecedented size.
"[W]ith the addition of these high stakes attached to the teacher evaluations, really just took it over the top," Smith-Thompson said. "Kids started talking about, 'If I fail, my teacher will get fired.' And kids should not be put in that position."
Once Smith-Thompson and other parents in her district "had the information about what was in the tests, the length of the tests, like eight hours--plus, you know, for most schools, months of test prep--it was a no-brainer," she continued.
Cindy Rubino, a parent in Lakeland whose children also boycotted the tests, told USA Today that she was "thrilled" with the turnout.
"I do believe this is a historic day in New York state, as we try to regain local control over the education of our kids," Rubino said. "These refusals are meant to protest a system that is currently failing our children and educators."
A new round of testing, focused on math, is set to begin next Tuesday.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.