SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Body-Cam Company Has Financial Ties to Police Chiefs
Taser International has paid expenses for and hired police chiefs who endorse the company
Mar 03, 2015
Taser International, which manufactures and sells police tools like stun guns and body cameras, has financial ties to police chiefs whose departments have purchased the devices, raising concerns about conflicts of interest between the company and the law enforcement agencies.
Taser has reportedly covered international airfare and hotels for police chiefs, and taken on recently retired chiefs as consultants, on many occasions directly after their departments signed contracts with the company to purchase their cameras, video storage, and other products, which can cost millions. Other chiefs have endorsed the company in speaking engagements at promotional conferences.
According to the Associated Press, a police chief in Fort Worth, Texas who had pushed for a Taser contract in his department wrote to a company representative in an email, "Someone should give me a raise."
While the demand for body cameras among law enforcement has risen in the wake of the high-profile police killings of unarmed citizens, critics are noting the potential for biased dealings when police chiefs profit off of private companies.
For example, the Salt Lake City police department used surplus funds to purchase 295 body cameras, which allowed them to bypass standard approval procedures with the city council, according to the AP. The department also refused to disclose how much it had spent on that equipment and ignored a month-old public records request.
"Department heads need to be very careful to avoid that type of appearance of an endorsement in a for-profit setting," Salt Lake City councilman Charlie Luke told AP.
In October, President Barack Obama responded to the outcry over the Pentagon's controversial 1033 program, which redistributes surplus military supplies to police forces, by releasing a 19-page report Federal Support for Local Law Enforcement Acquisition.
As Nadia Kayyali, a member of the activism team at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, pointed out at the time,"the President's review broadly overlooks surveillance technology. But the same DHS money that funds armored vehicles and night vision goggles funds intelligence gathering at the local level through fusion centers and drones, and events like Urban Shield, a 4 day long event that featured "preparedness" exercises as well as a marketplace of military and surveillance technology.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Taser International, which manufactures and sells police tools like stun guns and body cameras, has financial ties to police chiefs whose departments have purchased the devices, raising concerns about conflicts of interest between the company and the law enforcement agencies.
Taser has reportedly covered international airfare and hotels for police chiefs, and taken on recently retired chiefs as consultants, on many occasions directly after their departments signed contracts with the company to purchase their cameras, video storage, and other products, which can cost millions. Other chiefs have endorsed the company in speaking engagements at promotional conferences.
According to the Associated Press, a police chief in Fort Worth, Texas who had pushed for a Taser contract in his department wrote to a company representative in an email, "Someone should give me a raise."
While the demand for body cameras among law enforcement has risen in the wake of the high-profile police killings of unarmed citizens, critics are noting the potential for biased dealings when police chiefs profit off of private companies.
For example, the Salt Lake City police department used surplus funds to purchase 295 body cameras, which allowed them to bypass standard approval procedures with the city council, according to the AP. The department also refused to disclose how much it had spent on that equipment and ignored a month-old public records request.
"Department heads need to be very careful to avoid that type of appearance of an endorsement in a for-profit setting," Salt Lake City councilman Charlie Luke told AP.
In October, President Barack Obama responded to the outcry over the Pentagon's controversial 1033 program, which redistributes surplus military supplies to police forces, by releasing a 19-page report Federal Support for Local Law Enforcement Acquisition.
As Nadia Kayyali, a member of the activism team at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, pointed out at the time,"the President's review broadly overlooks surveillance technology. But the same DHS money that funds armored vehicles and night vision goggles funds intelligence gathering at the local level through fusion centers and drones, and events like Urban Shield, a 4 day long event that featured "preparedness" exercises as well as a marketplace of military and surveillance technology.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Taser International, which manufactures and sells police tools like stun guns and body cameras, has financial ties to police chiefs whose departments have purchased the devices, raising concerns about conflicts of interest between the company and the law enforcement agencies.
Taser has reportedly covered international airfare and hotels for police chiefs, and taken on recently retired chiefs as consultants, on many occasions directly after their departments signed contracts with the company to purchase their cameras, video storage, and other products, which can cost millions. Other chiefs have endorsed the company in speaking engagements at promotional conferences.
According to the Associated Press, a police chief in Fort Worth, Texas who had pushed for a Taser contract in his department wrote to a company representative in an email, "Someone should give me a raise."
While the demand for body cameras among law enforcement has risen in the wake of the high-profile police killings of unarmed citizens, critics are noting the potential for biased dealings when police chiefs profit off of private companies.
For example, the Salt Lake City police department used surplus funds to purchase 295 body cameras, which allowed them to bypass standard approval procedures with the city council, according to the AP. The department also refused to disclose how much it had spent on that equipment and ignored a month-old public records request.
"Department heads need to be very careful to avoid that type of appearance of an endorsement in a for-profit setting," Salt Lake City councilman Charlie Luke told AP.
In October, President Barack Obama responded to the outcry over the Pentagon's controversial 1033 program, which redistributes surplus military supplies to police forces, by releasing a 19-page report Federal Support for Local Law Enforcement Acquisition.
As Nadia Kayyali, a member of the activism team at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, pointed out at the time,"the President's review broadly overlooks surveillance technology. But the same DHS money that funds armored vehicles and night vision goggles funds intelligence gathering at the local level through fusion centers and drones, and events like Urban Shield, a 4 day long event that featured "preparedness" exercises as well as a marketplace of military and surveillance technology.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy