Canada Faces Dual Challenges On Solitary Confinement
'The link between torture, cruel treatment and solitary confinement is too important for Canadians to remain silent.'
Canada's government is facing challenges on two fronts from groups claiming its use of solitary confinement in prisons is unconstitutional.
On Tuesday, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) and the Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies (CAEFS) filed a petition in the Ontario Superior Court seeking to challenge the constitutionality of isolation, which the groups call cruel and inhumane.
"The link between torture, cruel treatment and solitary confinement is too important for Canadians to remain silent," said Sukanya Pillay, general counsel and executive director of CCLA. "We cannot equivocate about measures that result in torture. We must protect the prison population's most vulnerable members, which includes people with mental health issues."
Just last week, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association and the John Howard Society of Canada launched a similar lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that "the use of solitary confinement--where prisoners are isolated for up to 23 hours a day, sometimes for months and years at a time--amounts to cruel and unusual punishment," according to a press release. "The lawsuit argues that the solitary confinement regime leads to prisoner suffering and deaths, deprives prisoners of fundamental procedural protections and is discriminatory against both mentally ill and Aboriginal prisoners."
Carmen Cheung, senior counsel at the BCCLA, declared: "Prolonged, indefinite solitary confinement is internationally regarded as torture. At a time when the rest of the world is scaling back the use of solitary confinement, Canada remains steadfast in its reliance on a broken and dangerous system. From the Correctional Investigator of Canada to the United Nations Committee Against Torture, the message to our government has been the same: Canada must change the way it uses solitary confinement in its prisons. Canada hasn't acted to put an end to this abuse, so we hope that our lawsuit will."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Canada's government is facing challenges on two fronts from groups claiming its use of solitary confinement in prisons is unconstitutional.
On Tuesday, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) and the Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies (CAEFS) filed a petition in the Ontario Superior Court seeking to challenge the constitutionality of isolation, which the groups call cruel and inhumane.
"The link between torture, cruel treatment and solitary confinement is too important for Canadians to remain silent," said Sukanya Pillay, general counsel and executive director of CCLA. "We cannot equivocate about measures that result in torture. We must protect the prison population's most vulnerable members, which includes people with mental health issues."
Just last week, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association and the John Howard Society of Canada launched a similar lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that "the use of solitary confinement--where prisoners are isolated for up to 23 hours a day, sometimes for months and years at a time--amounts to cruel and unusual punishment," according to a press release. "The lawsuit argues that the solitary confinement regime leads to prisoner suffering and deaths, deprives prisoners of fundamental procedural protections and is discriminatory against both mentally ill and Aboriginal prisoners."
Carmen Cheung, senior counsel at the BCCLA, declared: "Prolonged, indefinite solitary confinement is internationally regarded as torture. At a time when the rest of the world is scaling back the use of solitary confinement, Canada remains steadfast in its reliance on a broken and dangerous system. From the Correctional Investigator of Canada to the United Nations Committee Against Torture, the message to our government has been the same: Canada must change the way it uses solitary confinement in its prisons. Canada hasn't acted to put an end to this abuse, so we hope that our lawsuit will."
Canada's government is facing challenges on two fronts from groups claiming its use of solitary confinement in prisons is unconstitutional.
On Tuesday, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) and the Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies (CAEFS) filed a petition in the Ontario Superior Court seeking to challenge the constitutionality of isolation, which the groups call cruel and inhumane.
"The link between torture, cruel treatment and solitary confinement is too important for Canadians to remain silent," said Sukanya Pillay, general counsel and executive director of CCLA. "We cannot equivocate about measures that result in torture. We must protect the prison population's most vulnerable members, which includes people with mental health issues."
Just last week, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association and the John Howard Society of Canada launched a similar lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that "the use of solitary confinement--where prisoners are isolated for up to 23 hours a day, sometimes for months and years at a time--amounts to cruel and unusual punishment," according to a press release. "The lawsuit argues that the solitary confinement regime leads to prisoner suffering and deaths, deprives prisoners of fundamental procedural protections and is discriminatory against both mentally ill and Aboriginal prisoners."
Carmen Cheung, senior counsel at the BCCLA, declared: "Prolonged, indefinite solitary confinement is internationally regarded as torture. At a time when the rest of the world is scaling back the use of solitary confinement, Canada remains steadfast in its reliance on a broken and dangerous system. From the Correctional Investigator of Canada to the United Nations Committee Against Torture, the message to our government has been the same: Canada must change the way it uses solitary confinement in its prisons. Canada hasn't acted to put an end to this abuse, so we hope that our lawsuit will."