Fast-food workers striking in New York City in July of 2013. (Photo: Annette Bernhardt/flickr/cc)
Jan 23, 2015
A growing movement of fast food workers has launched strikes, protests, and public pressure campaigns across the United States and world demanding an end to starvation wages and a minimum of $15 an hour, under the slogan "We are worth more!"
Now, a just-released paper from economic researchers is affirming what those employees have long argued: such pay is doable, affordable, and would not require mass firings, despite the claims of industry heavyweights, from McDonald's to Wendy's.
Entitled A $15 Minimum Wage: How the Fast-Food Industry Could Adjust Without Shedding Jobs, the paper was written by Robert Pollin, distinguished professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts - Amherst and co-director of the Political Economy Research Institute, and Jeannette Wicks-Lim, a PERI research assistant professor.
Culling data from previous studies and U.S. Economic Census surveys, the researchers chart out the potential impact of a minimum wage increase, from $7.25 to $15 an hour over the course of four years, on the industry.
Their conclusion? The fast food industry "could absorb the increase in its overall wage bill without resorting to cuts in their employment levels at any point over this four-year adjustment period."
According to the researchers, this could be accomplished through "a combination of turnover reductions; trend increases in sales growth; and modest annual price increases over the four-year period."
In fact, the paper finds, a $15 minimum wage would not even hurt the bottom-line for the fast food industry.
The study directly contradicts numerous claims by the fast food industry, which has been put on the defensive by nation-wide and global escalations of fast food worker protests.
"Mandating increased wages would lead to higher prices for consumers, lower foot traffic and sales for franchise owners, and ultimately, lost jobs and opportunities for employees to become managers or franchise owners," said International Franchise Association President and CEO Steve Caldeira in a statement issued over the summer.
But according to Pollin and Wicks-Lim, this is simply not the case.
"In terms of policy implications, our results offer a straightforward conclusion," they write. "Achieving a $15 federal minimum wage within the U.S., phased in over four years, should be seen as a realistic prospect. This specifically means that the intended consequence of the $15 minimum wage--to improve the living standards of low-wage workers in the U.S. and their families--can certainly prevail over the unintended consequence that low-wage workers and their families would suffer from widespread employment losses."
The study follows an April report by the think tank Demos, which found that, in 2012, fast food CEOs made over 1,200 times the earnings of the average fast food worker. That ratio remained over 1,000 to 1 in 2013, according to the study.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
A growing movement of fast food workers has launched strikes, protests, and public pressure campaigns across the United States and world demanding an end to starvation wages and a minimum of $15 an hour, under the slogan "We are worth more!"
Now, a just-released paper from economic researchers is affirming what those employees have long argued: such pay is doable, affordable, and would not require mass firings, despite the claims of industry heavyweights, from McDonald's to Wendy's.
Entitled A $15 Minimum Wage: How the Fast-Food Industry Could Adjust Without Shedding Jobs, the paper was written by Robert Pollin, distinguished professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts - Amherst and co-director of the Political Economy Research Institute, and Jeannette Wicks-Lim, a PERI research assistant professor.
Culling data from previous studies and U.S. Economic Census surveys, the researchers chart out the potential impact of a minimum wage increase, from $7.25 to $15 an hour over the course of four years, on the industry.
Their conclusion? The fast food industry "could absorb the increase in its overall wage bill without resorting to cuts in their employment levels at any point over this four-year adjustment period."
According to the researchers, this could be accomplished through "a combination of turnover reductions; trend increases in sales growth; and modest annual price increases over the four-year period."
In fact, the paper finds, a $15 minimum wage would not even hurt the bottom-line for the fast food industry.
The study directly contradicts numerous claims by the fast food industry, which has been put on the defensive by nation-wide and global escalations of fast food worker protests.
"Mandating increased wages would lead to higher prices for consumers, lower foot traffic and sales for franchise owners, and ultimately, lost jobs and opportunities for employees to become managers or franchise owners," said International Franchise Association President and CEO Steve Caldeira in a statement issued over the summer.
But according to Pollin and Wicks-Lim, this is simply not the case.
"In terms of policy implications, our results offer a straightforward conclusion," they write. "Achieving a $15 federal minimum wage within the U.S., phased in over four years, should be seen as a realistic prospect. This specifically means that the intended consequence of the $15 minimum wage--to improve the living standards of low-wage workers in the U.S. and their families--can certainly prevail over the unintended consequence that low-wage workers and their families would suffer from widespread employment losses."
The study follows an April report by the think tank Demos, which found that, in 2012, fast food CEOs made over 1,200 times the earnings of the average fast food worker. That ratio remained over 1,000 to 1 in 2013, according to the study.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
A growing movement of fast food workers has launched strikes, protests, and public pressure campaigns across the United States and world demanding an end to starvation wages and a minimum of $15 an hour, under the slogan "We are worth more!"
Now, a just-released paper from economic researchers is affirming what those employees have long argued: such pay is doable, affordable, and would not require mass firings, despite the claims of industry heavyweights, from McDonald's to Wendy's.
Entitled A $15 Minimum Wage: How the Fast-Food Industry Could Adjust Without Shedding Jobs, the paper was written by Robert Pollin, distinguished professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts - Amherst and co-director of the Political Economy Research Institute, and Jeannette Wicks-Lim, a PERI research assistant professor.
Culling data from previous studies and U.S. Economic Census surveys, the researchers chart out the potential impact of a minimum wage increase, from $7.25 to $15 an hour over the course of four years, on the industry.
Their conclusion? The fast food industry "could absorb the increase in its overall wage bill without resorting to cuts in their employment levels at any point over this four-year adjustment period."
According to the researchers, this could be accomplished through "a combination of turnover reductions; trend increases in sales growth; and modest annual price increases over the four-year period."
In fact, the paper finds, a $15 minimum wage would not even hurt the bottom-line for the fast food industry.
The study directly contradicts numerous claims by the fast food industry, which has been put on the defensive by nation-wide and global escalations of fast food worker protests.
"Mandating increased wages would lead to higher prices for consumers, lower foot traffic and sales for franchise owners, and ultimately, lost jobs and opportunities for employees to become managers or franchise owners," said International Franchise Association President and CEO Steve Caldeira in a statement issued over the summer.
But according to Pollin and Wicks-Lim, this is simply not the case.
"In terms of policy implications, our results offer a straightforward conclusion," they write. "Achieving a $15 federal minimum wage within the U.S., phased in over four years, should be seen as a realistic prospect. This specifically means that the intended consequence of the $15 minimum wage--to improve the living standards of low-wage workers in the U.S. and their families--can certainly prevail over the unintended consequence that low-wage workers and their families would suffer from widespread employment losses."
The study follows an April report by the think tank Demos, which found that, in 2012, fast food CEOs made over 1,200 times the earnings of the average fast food worker. That ratio remained over 1,000 to 1 in 2013, according to the study.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.