A June 9 controlled burn of oil from the Deepwater Horizon/BP oil spill. (Photo: Coast Guard Photo/Petty Officer First Class John Masson)
Dec 09, 2014
Despite BP's public relations blitz and high-priced team of lawyers, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the oil giant's challenge to a settlement of billions of dollars for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion oil spill.
The challenge was just the latest attempt by the company to avoid paying those impacted by the disaster.
Agreed to in 2012, the settlement stipulates that some businesses claiming economic damages must show a pattern of loss relating to the spill, but are not required to prove causation in order to receive claims. However, after the agreement was implemented, BP backed away from this agreement and launched a vigorous effort to deny the subsequent claims.
The company launched an aggressive public relations campaign in an effort to build public support for its case, including placing full-page ads in the The Washington Post and The New York Times. Many media outlets offered favorable coverage to BP free of charge, including Bloomberg Business Week and 60 Minutes.
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court issued a one-sentence, unanimous ruling in which it declined to revisit rulings by lower courts. The decision means the company has no choice but to pay eligible claims.
"Today's ruling is a huge victory for the Gulf, and should finally put to rest BP's two-year attack on its own settlement," the lead attorneys for the class of affected businesses, Stephen J. Herman and James P. Roy, said in a statement, which slammed the company for attempting to "rewrite history."
The 2010 disaster killed 11 workers and led to the country's worst off-shore oil spill, which continues to pose and environmental and public health threat to Gulf Coast communities.
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Despite BP's public relations blitz and high-priced team of lawyers, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the oil giant's challenge to a settlement of billions of dollars for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion oil spill.
The challenge was just the latest attempt by the company to avoid paying those impacted by the disaster.
Agreed to in 2012, the settlement stipulates that some businesses claiming economic damages must show a pattern of loss relating to the spill, but are not required to prove causation in order to receive claims. However, after the agreement was implemented, BP backed away from this agreement and launched a vigorous effort to deny the subsequent claims.
The company launched an aggressive public relations campaign in an effort to build public support for its case, including placing full-page ads in the The Washington Post and The New York Times. Many media outlets offered favorable coverage to BP free of charge, including Bloomberg Business Week and 60 Minutes.
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court issued a one-sentence, unanimous ruling in which it declined to revisit rulings by lower courts. The decision means the company has no choice but to pay eligible claims.
"Today's ruling is a huge victory for the Gulf, and should finally put to rest BP's two-year attack on its own settlement," the lead attorneys for the class of affected businesses, Stephen J. Herman and James P. Roy, said in a statement, which slammed the company for attempting to "rewrite history."
The 2010 disaster killed 11 workers and led to the country's worst off-shore oil spill, which continues to pose and environmental and public health threat to Gulf Coast communities.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Despite BP's public relations blitz and high-priced team of lawyers, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the oil giant's challenge to a settlement of billions of dollars for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon explosion oil spill.
The challenge was just the latest attempt by the company to avoid paying those impacted by the disaster.
Agreed to in 2012, the settlement stipulates that some businesses claiming economic damages must show a pattern of loss relating to the spill, but are not required to prove causation in order to receive claims. However, after the agreement was implemented, BP backed away from this agreement and launched a vigorous effort to deny the subsequent claims.
The company launched an aggressive public relations campaign in an effort to build public support for its case, including placing full-page ads in the The Washington Post and The New York Times. Many media outlets offered favorable coverage to BP free of charge, including Bloomberg Business Week and 60 Minutes.
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court issued a one-sentence, unanimous ruling in which it declined to revisit rulings by lower courts. The decision means the company has no choice but to pay eligible claims.
"Today's ruling is a huge victory for the Gulf, and should finally put to rest BP's two-year attack on its own settlement," the lead attorneys for the class of affected businesses, Stephen J. Herman and James P. Roy, said in a statement, which slammed the company for attempting to "rewrite history."
The 2010 disaster killed 11 workers and led to the country's worst off-shore oil spill, which continues to pose and environmental and public health threat to Gulf Coast communities.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.