SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Green Groups Fight to Uphold Colorado Town's Ban on Fracking
"If we are successful with this it will resonate around the country."
Sep 12, 2014
A coalition of environmental organizations this week filed a motion to preserve the groundbreaking ban on fracking enacted by Longmont, Colorado voters in 2012.
Our Health Our Future Our Longmont, Food & Water Watch, Sierra Club, and Earthworks, represented by the University of Denver Law Clinic, appealed a July ruling by a Colorado judge that struck down the prohibition. "We are committed to continuing to protect the health, safety and property of Longmont residents," said Kaye Fissinger, President of Our Health Our Future Our Longmont.
Boulder District Judge D.D. Mallard had ruled that Longmont's ban constitutes an "irreconcilable conflict" with the state's interests in oil and gas interests, and that the state takes precedence over the local ruling.
But the coalition that appealed the ruling argues that state law prohibits extractive policies that are harmful to the environment. "Fracking is an inherently harmful practice that has no place near our towns, homes and recreational areas," said Sam Schabacker, Western Region Director with Food & Water Watch. "It is the State's duty to ban fracking in order to uphold its responsibility to safeguard our communities and our natural resources."
Longmont was the first town in Colorado to instate a fracking moratorium, and four other cities and towns have since passed similar bans. But these grassroots initiatives face well-funded foes: in every case where a moratorium was passed, the municipality has been sued by oil and gas industries seeking to toss out the prohibitions. Last month a Colorado judge struck down a ban on fracking in Fort Collins and state politicians removed anti-fracking measures from the upcoming November ballot.
Fissinger told Common Dreams that the coalition appealing the Longmont ruling plans to take the case "all the way to the Colorado Supreme Court," adding, "We are hopeful that the courts will recognize the severity of this issue and will look at the subject with fresh and open eyes."
"If we are successful with this it will resonate around the country," she said. "Even the industry has acknowledged they are afraid if we succeed in Colorado it will have a domino effect."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
A coalition of environmental organizations this week filed a motion to preserve the groundbreaking ban on fracking enacted by Longmont, Colorado voters in 2012.
Our Health Our Future Our Longmont, Food & Water Watch, Sierra Club, and Earthworks, represented by the University of Denver Law Clinic, appealed a July ruling by a Colorado judge that struck down the prohibition. "We are committed to continuing to protect the health, safety and property of Longmont residents," said Kaye Fissinger, President of Our Health Our Future Our Longmont.
Boulder District Judge D.D. Mallard had ruled that Longmont's ban constitutes an "irreconcilable conflict" with the state's interests in oil and gas interests, and that the state takes precedence over the local ruling.
But the coalition that appealed the ruling argues that state law prohibits extractive policies that are harmful to the environment. "Fracking is an inherently harmful practice that has no place near our towns, homes and recreational areas," said Sam Schabacker, Western Region Director with Food & Water Watch. "It is the State's duty to ban fracking in order to uphold its responsibility to safeguard our communities and our natural resources."
Longmont was the first town in Colorado to instate a fracking moratorium, and four other cities and towns have since passed similar bans. But these grassroots initiatives face well-funded foes: in every case where a moratorium was passed, the municipality has been sued by oil and gas industries seeking to toss out the prohibitions. Last month a Colorado judge struck down a ban on fracking in Fort Collins and state politicians removed anti-fracking measures from the upcoming November ballot.
Fissinger told Common Dreams that the coalition appealing the Longmont ruling plans to take the case "all the way to the Colorado Supreme Court," adding, "We are hopeful that the courts will recognize the severity of this issue and will look at the subject with fresh and open eyes."
"If we are successful with this it will resonate around the country," she said. "Even the industry has acknowledged they are afraid if we succeed in Colorado it will have a domino effect."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
A coalition of environmental organizations this week filed a motion to preserve the groundbreaking ban on fracking enacted by Longmont, Colorado voters in 2012.
Our Health Our Future Our Longmont, Food & Water Watch, Sierra Club, and Earthworks, represented by the University of Denver Law Clinic, appealed a July ruling by a Colorado judge that struck down the prohibition. "We are committed to continuing to protect the health, safety and property of Longmont residents," said Kaye Fissinger, President of Our Health Our Future Our Longmont.
Boulder District Judge D.D. Mallard had ruled that Longmont's ban constitutes an "irreconcilable conflict" with the state's interests in oil and gas interests, and that the state takes precedence over the local ruling.
But the coalition that appealed the ruling argues that state law prohibits extractive policies that are harmful to the environment. "Fracking is an inherently harmful practice that has no place near our towns, homes and recreational areas," said Sam Schabacker, Western Region Director with Food & Water Watch. "It is the State's duty to ban fracking in order to uphold its responsibility to safeguard our communities and our natural resources."
Longmont was the first town in Colorado to instate a fracking moratorium, and four other cities and towns have since passed similar bans. But these grassroots initiatives face well-funded foes: in every case where a moratorium was passed, the municipality has been sued by oil and gas industries seeking to toss out the prohibitions. Last month a Colorado judge struck down a ban on fracking in Fort Collins and state politicians removed anti-fracking measures from the upcoming November ballot.
Fissinger told Common Dreams that the coalition appealing the Longmont ruling plans to take the case "all the way to the Colorado Supreme Court," adding, "We are hopeful that the courts will recognize the severity of this issue and will look at the subject with fresh and open eyes."
"If we are successful with this it will resonate around the country," she said. "Even the industry has acknowledged they are afraid if we succeed in Colorado it will have a domino effect."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.