

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Thirty-two states have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to make an over-arching decision on whether same-sex marriage is legally recognized.
According to a report released Thursday by the Associated Press:
Fifteen states that allow gay marriage, led by Massachusetts, filed a brief asking the justices to take up three cases from Virginia, Utah and Oklahoma and overturn bans. And 17 other states, led by Colorado, that have banned the practice asked the court to hear cases from Utah and Oklahoma to clear up a "morass" of lawsuits, but didn't urge the court to rule one way or another.
...Colorado's brief argued that the definition of marriage faces legal challenges only the Supreme Court can resolve, and that without a Supreme Court decision, states defending bans could be liable for huge legal bills from future lawsuits if they are overturned.
The filing was announced the same day that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago unanimously upheld the overturning, by district courts, of same-sex marriage bans in Indiana and Wisconsin -- in what was heralded as a significant victory by proponents of marriage equality.
"Every loving and committed couple in the U.S. should have the freedom to marry, protect their loved ones, and have their commitment honored by our legal system," said John Knight, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project, in a statement issued Thursday in response to the Indiana and Wisconsin decisions. "We celebrate and tomorrow we continue the fight to make marriage equality the law of the land, not just in certain states."
However, this week has also seen marriage equality set-backs, including a Louisiana court's affirmation of a state ban on same-sex marriage, which follows the decision by a Tennessee judge last month that the prohibition of same-sex marriages is constitutional.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Thirty-two states have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to make an over-arching decision on whether same-sex marriage is legally recognized.
According to a report released Thursday by the Associated Press:
Fifteen states that allow gay marriage, led by Massachusetts, filed a brief asking the justices to take up three cases from Virginia, Utah and Oklahoma and overturn bans. And 17 other states, led by Colorado, that have banned the practice asked the court to hear cases from Utah and Oklahoma to clear up a "morass" of lawsuits, but didn't urge the court to rule one way or another.
...Colorado's brief argued that the definition of marriage faces legal challenges only the Supreme Court can resolve, and that without a Supreme Court decision, states defending bans could be liable for huge legal bills from future lawsuits if they are overturned.
The filing was announced the same day that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago unanimously upheld the overturning, by district courts, of same-sex marriage bans in Indiana and Wisconsin -- in what was heralded as a significant victory by proponents of marriage equality.
"Every loving and committed couple in the U.S. should have the freedom to marry, protect their loved ones, and have their commitment honored by our legal system," said John Knight, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project, in a statement issued Thursday in response to the Indiana and Wisconsin decisions. "We celebrate and tomorrow we continue the fight to make marriage equality the law of the land, not just in certain states."
However, this week has also seen marriage equality set-backs, including a Louisiana court's affirmation of a state ban on same-sex marriage, which follows the decision by a Tennessee judge last month that the prohibition of same-sex marriages is constitutional.
Thirty-two states have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to make an over-arching decision on whether same-sex marriage is legally recognized.
According to a report released Thursday by the Associated Press:
Fifteen states that allow gay marriage, led by Massachusetts, filed a brief asking the justices to take up three cases from Virginia, Utah and Oklahoma and overturn bans. And 17 other states, led by Colorado, that have banned the practice asked the court to hear cases from Utah and Oklahoma to clear up a "morass" of lawsuits, but didn't urge the court to rule one way or another.
...Colorado's brief argued that the definition of marriage faces legal challenges only the Supreme Court can resolve, and that without a Supreme Court decision, states defending bans could be liable for huge legal bills from future lawsuits if they are overturned.
The filing was announced the same day that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago unanimously upheld the overturning, by district courts, of same-sex marriage bans in Indiana and Wisconsin -- in what was heralded as a significant victory by proponents of marriage equality.
"Every loving and committed couple in the U.S. should have the freedom to marry, protect their loved ones, and have their commitment honored by our legal system," said John Knight, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project, in a statement issued Thursday in response to the Indiana and Wisconsin decisions. "We celebrate and tomorrow we continue the fight to make marriage equality the law of the land, not just in certain states."
However, this week has also seen marriage equality set-backs, including a Louisiana court's affirmation of a state ban on same-sex marriage, which follows the decision by a Tennessee judge last month that the prohibition of same-sex marriages is constitutional.