SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. Air Force readying aid for Sinjar, Iraq earlier this month. (Photo: U.S. Air Force/Staff Sgt. Vernon Young Jr.)
US Renews Airstrikes in Iraq as Part of 'Humanitarian' Mission
Humanitarian aid dropped to town under siege by ISIS as US military operations in nation expand
Aug 31, 2014
The United States carried out new air strikes in Iraq on Saturday night to accompany what the Pentagon said was a "humanitarian assistance operation" to help Shia Turkmen under a nearly two-month siege by Islamic militants.
According to a statement released by Pentagon Press Secretary Rear Adm. Kirby, "These military operations were conducted under authorization from the Commander-in-Chief to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance and to prevent an ISIL attack on the civilians of Amirli. The operations will be limited in their scope and duration as necessary to address this emerging humanitarian crisis and protect the civilians trapped in Amirli."
According to earlier reporting by Ahmad Mohammed at Niqash.org:
Amerli, which is home to mostly Shiite Muslims of Turkmen ethnicity, has been under siege by forces from the extremist group known as the Islamic State, or IS, since mid-June.
Since the extremists took control of most of the area around the town, forcing other Shiite Muslim Turkmen into Amerli, it has been extremely difficult to get any goods or people in or out. The extremists have also disconnected water and power to the town.
In addition to the U.S. forces, British, Australian and French forces participated in the humanitarian aid drop.
Following President Obama's authorization on August 8 for airstrikes in Iraq as a response to humanitarian crisis, Middle East policy analyst Phyllis Bennis warned that "the U.S. history of linking airdrops of food and water with bombing raids is not a good one." In an op-ed in the Washington Post, Bennis added:
When, in November 2001, the U.S. bombed Afghanistan, desperate Afghans fled to the mountains to escape. They faced the cold with nothing, and the U.S. insisted on responding to their needs with an air drop -- against the advice of experienced humanitarian organizations advocating old-fashioned, if less telegenic, truck and donkey convoys. [...]
Dropping food and water isn't always the same as dropping bombs - but when it's the U.S. Air Force, with cargo planes full of food and water accompanied by fighter jets and bombers, it's way too easy for one to segue right into the other.
Though the Pentagon's statement assured military operations "limited in their scope and duration," in an op-ed in the New York Times this weekend, Secretary of State John Kerry wrote that "[w]hat's needed to confront [the Islamic State's] nihilistic vision and genocidal agenda is a global coalition using political, humanitarian, economic, law enforcement and intelligence tools to support military force." He added: "Airstrikes alone won't defeat this enemy. A much fuller response is demanded from the world."
The U.S. has conducted at least 115 airstrikes on Iraq since Aug. 8.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The United States carried out new air strikes in Iraq on Saturday night to accompany what the Pentagon said was a "humanitarian assistance operation" to help Shia Turkmen under a nearly two-month siege by Islamic militants.
According to a statement released by Pentagon Press Secretary Rear Adm. Kirby, "These military operations were conducted under authorization from the Commander-in-Chief to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance and to prevent an ISIL attack on the civilians of Amirli. The operations will be limited in their scope and duration as necessary to address this emerging humanitarian crisis and protect the civilians trapped in Amirli."
According to earlier reporting by Ahmad Mohammed at Niqash.org:
Amerli, which is home to mostly Shiite Muslims of Turkmen ethnicity, has been under siege by forces from the extremist group known as the Islamic State, or IS, since mid-June.
Since the extremists took control of most of the area around the town, forcing other Shiite Muslim Turkmen into Amerli, it has been extremely difficult to get any goods or people in or out. The extremists have also disconnected water and power to the town.
In addition to the U.S. forces, British, Australian and French forces participated in the humanitarian aid drop.
Following President Obama's authorization on August 8 for airstrikes in Iraq as a response to humanitarian crisis, Middle East policy analyst Phyllis Bennis warned that "the U.S. history of linking airdrops of food and water with bombing raids is not a good one." In an op-ed in the Washington Post, Bennis added:
When, in November 2001, the U.S. bombed Afghanistan, desperate Afghans fled to the mountains to escape. They faced the cold with nothing, and the U.S. insisted on responding to their needs with an air drop -- against the advice of experienced humanitarian organizations advocating old-fashioned, if less telegenic, truck and donkey convoys. [...]
Dropping food and water isn't always the same as dropping bombs - but when it's the U.S. Air Force, with cargo planes full of food and water accompanied by fighter jets and bombers, it's way too easy for one to segue right into the other.
Though the Pentagon's statement assured military operations "limited in their scope and duration," in an op-ed in the New York Times this weekend, Secretary of State John Kerry wrote that "[w]hat's needed to confront [the Islamic State's] nihilistic vision and genocidal agenda is a global coalition using political, humanitarian, economic, law enforcement and intelligence tools to support military force." He added: "Airstrikes alone won't defeat this enemy. A much fuller response is demanded from the world."
The U.S. has conducted at least 115 airstrikes on Iraq since Aug. 8.
The United States carried out new air strikes in Iraq on Saturday night to accompany what the Pentagon said was a "humanitarian assistance operation" to help Shia Turkmen under a nearly two-month siege by Islamic militants.
According to a statement released by Pentagon Press Secretary Rear Adm. Kirby, "These military operations were conducted under authorization from the Commander-in-Chief to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance and to prevent an ISIL attack on the civilians of Amirli. The operations will be limited in their scope and duration as necessary to address this emerging humanitarian crisis and protect the civilians trapped in Amirli."
According to earlier reporting by Ahmad Mohammed at Niqash.org:
Amerli, which is home to mostly Shiite Muslims of Turkmen ethnicity, has been under siege by forces from the extremist group known as the Islamic State, or IS, since mid-June.
Since the extremists took control of most of the area around the town, forcing other Shiite Muslim Turkmen into Amerli, it has been extremely difficult to get any goods or people in or out. The extremists have also disconnected water and power to the town.
In addition to the U.S. forces, British, Australian and French forces participated in the humanitarian aid drop.
Following President Obama's authorization on August 8 for airstrikes in Iraq as a response to humanitarian crisis, Middle East policy analyst Phyllis Bennis warned that "the U.S. history of linking airdrops of food and water with bombing raids is not a good one." In an op-ed in the Washington Post, Bennis added:
When, in November 2001, the U.S. bombed Afghanistan, desperate Afghans fled to the mountains to escape. They faced the cold with nothing, and the U.S. insisted on responding to their needs with an air drop -- against the advice of experienced humanitarian organizations advocating old-fashioned, if less telegenic, truck and donkey convoys. [...]
Dropping food and water isn't always the same as dropping bombs - but when it's the U.S. Air Force, with cargo planes full of food and water accompanied by fighter jets and bombers, it's way too easy for one to segue right into the other.
Though the Pentagon's statement assured military operations "limited in their scope and duration," in an op-ed in the New York Times this weekend, Secretary of State John Kerry wrote that "[w]hat's needed to confront [the Islamic State's] nihilistic vision and genocidal agenda is a global coalition using political, humanitarian, economic, law enforcement and intelligence tools to support military force." He added: "Airstrikes alone won't defeat this enemy. A much fuller response is demanded from the world."
The U.S. has conducted at least 115 airstrikes on Iraq since Aug. 8.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.