SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A portion of an email (redacted and slightly altered to protect the source) sent to staff last week at a U.S. Marine Corps installation directing employees not to read this web site.
US Military Bars Access to News Site Reporting on Leaked Govt Secrets
Internal memo reveals efforts to keep US military personnel from reading new investigate outlet The Intercept
Aug 21, 2014
The new investigative reporting website The Intercept has been declared a no-go zone for U.S. military personnel, according to sources and an internal memo which was obtained by the site's journalists and published on Wednesday.
Founded by billionaire Pierre Omidar and investigative journalists Jeremy Scahill and Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept--since its launch earlier this year--has published numerous reports based on NSA documents leaked by Edward Snowden. More recently, its journalists have exposed other government secrets--including never before seen documents related to the US terrorism watch list--that may have been provided by a separate government whistleblower concerned about the ever-widening reach of the national security state.
On Wednesday, The Intercept's Ryan Gallagher reported:
According to multiple military sources, a notice has been circulated to units within the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps warning staff that they are prohibited from reading stories published by The Intercept on the grounds that they may contain classified information. The ban appears to apply to all employees--including those with top-secret security clearance--and is aimed at preventing classified information from being viewed on unclassified computer networks, even if it is freely available on the internet. Similar military-wide bans have been directed against news outlets in the past after leaks of classified information.
A directive issued to military staff at one location last week, obtained by The Intercept, threatens that any employees caught viewing classified material in the public domain will face "long term security issues." It suggests that the call to prohibit employees from viewing the website was made by senior officials over concerns about a "potential new leaker" of secret documents.
Though military censorship is nothing new, the continued pattern of blocking government employees from reading or accessing information that has been placed in the public domain demonstrates the culture of secrecy that permeates such institutions.
As Jon Fingas, an associate editor at the technology news site Engadget writes:
The move isn't totally surprising, of course. The government regularly puts strict limits on the sites you're allowed to visit from its offices, and it has a legal obligation to keep classified content off of devices where it doesn't belong. Even if higher-ups are sympathetic, they're required to both scrub computers clean and report any visits. Nonetheless, the Intercept ban highlights a certain absurdity to the government's data policies -- it's barring access to "secret" surveillance details that you can easily read as soon as you leave for home.
Read the full story here.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The new investigative reporting website The Intercept has been declared a no-go zone for U.S. military personnel, according to sources and an internal memo which was obtained by the site's journalists and published on Wednesday.
Founded by billionaire Pierre Omidar and investigative journalists Jeremy Scahill and Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept--since its launch earlier this year--has published numerous reports based on NSA documents leaked by Edward Snowden. More recently, its journalists have exposed other government secrets--including never before seen documents related to the US terrorism watch list--that may have been provided by a separate government whistleblower concerned about the ever-widening reach of the national security state.
On Wednesday, The Intercept's Ryan Gallagher reported:
According to multiple military sources, a notice has been circulated to units within the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps warning staff that they are prohibited from reading stories published by The Intercept on the grounds that they may contain classified information. The ban appears to apply to all employees--including those with top-secret security clearance--and is aimed at preventing classified information from being viewed on unclassified computer networks, even if it is freely available on the internet. Similar military-wide bans have been directed against news outlets in the past after leaks of classified information.
A directive issued to military staff at one location last week, obtained by The Intercept, threatens that any employees caught viewing classified material in the public domain will face "long term security issues." It suggests that the call to prohibit employees from viewing the website was made by senior officials over concerns about a "potential new leaker" of secret documents.
Though military censorship is nothing new, the continued pattern of blocking government employees from reading or accessing information that has been placed in the public domain demonstrates the culture of secrecy that permeates such institutions.
As Jon Fingas, an associate editor at the technology news site Engadget writes:
The move isn't totally surprising, of course. The government regularly puts strict limits on the sites you're allowed to visit from its offices, and it has a legal obligation to keep classified content off of devices where it doesn't belong. Even if higher-ups are sympathetic, they're required to both scrub computers clean and report any visits. Nonetheless, the Intercept ban highlights a certain absurdity to the government's data policies -- it's barring access to "secret" surveillance details that you can easily read as soon as you leave for home.
Read the full story here.
The new investigative reporting website The Intercept has been declared a no-go zone for U.S. military personnel, according to sources and an internal memo which was obtained by the site's journalists and published on Wednesday.
Founded by billionaire Pierre Omidar and investigative journalists Jeremy Scahill and Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept--since its launch earlier this year--has published numerous reports based on NSA documents leaked by Edward Snowden. More recently, its journalists have exposed other government secrets--including never before seen documents related to the US terrorism watch list--that may have been provided by a separate government whistleblower concerned about the ever-widening reach of the national security state.
On Wednesday, The Intercept's Ryan Gallagher reported:
According to multiple military sources, a notice has been circulated to units within the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps warning staff that they are prohibited from reading stories published by The Intercept on the grounds that they may contain classified information. The ban appears to apply to all employees--including those with top-secret security clearance--and is aimed at preventing classified information from being viewed on unclassified computer networks, even if it is freely available on the internet. Similar military-wide bans have been directed against news outlets in the past after leaks of classified information.
A directive issued to military staff at one location last week, obtained by The Intercept, threatens that any employees caught viewing classified material in the public domain will face "long term security issues." It suggests that the call to prohibit employees from viewing the website was made by senior officials over concerns about a "potential new leaker" of secret documents.
Though military censorship is nothing new, the continued pattern of blocking government employees from reading or accessing information that has been placed in the public domain demonstrates the culture of secrecy that permeates such institutions.
As Jon Fingas, an associate editor at the technology news site Engadget writes:
The move isn't totally surprising, of course. The government regularly puts strict limits on the sites you're allowed to visit from its offices, and it has a legal obligation to keep classified content off of devices where it doesn't belong. Even if higher-ups are sympathetic, they're required to both scrub computers clean and report any visits. Nonetheless, the Intercept ban highlights a certain absurdity to the government's data policies -- it's barring access to "secret" surveillance details that you can easily read as soon as you leave for home.
Read the full story here.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.