SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rick Perry to Send 1,000 Troops to Border to Fight Migrant Children and Families
Texas Governor calls influx of immigration an "assault" on US
Jul 22, 2014
Texas Governor Rick Perry announced on Tuesday that he is sending 1,000 National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border to stem the tide of children and families attempting to emigrate from several Central American countries.
Adj. Gen. John Nichols, commander of the Texas National Guard, said the troops would be "referring and deterring" people who are intercepted at the border, although the National Guard does have the authority under state law to make arrests.
Human rights groups and Democrats said the move was politically motivated and served to further militarize the border, rather than help children who are seeking refuge in the U.S.
Terri Burke, executive director of ACLU Texas, stated, "These are children who are running into the arms of the Border Patrol agents. They aren't sneaking in... They have come to escape the violence and crime in their own countries. Yet Governor Perry insists on needlessly further militarizing our border for what can only be interpreted as a political stunt."
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) tweeted:
The Texas Democratic Party said Perry, who is running for president in 2016, was more concerned with "continuing his routine of photo-op politics to further his presidential aspirations" than trying to solve the border crisis.
Perry has long been an outspoken critic of the federal government's effort to address the immigration issue. "I will not stand idly by while our citizens are under assault," he said during a press conference, adding that the government's "lip service and empty promises" have prompted this newest action. The initiative, which the governor dubbed "Operation Strong Safety," will cost Texas approximately $12 million a month. Perry did not elaborate on how it would be paid for.
Critics said the resources should be used for humanitarian aid rather than law enforcement.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest argued that Perry's initiative is misguided. "Gov. Perry has referred repeatedly to his desire to make a symbolic statement to the people of Central America that the border is closed, and he thinks that the best way to do that is to send a thousand National Guard troops to the border," Earnest said. "It seems to me that a much more powerful symbol would be the bipartisan passage of legislation that would actually make a historic investment in border security and send an additional 20,000 personnel to the border," referring to recent immigration legislation that passed in the U.S. Senate but remains stalled in the House of Representatives.
Perry claimed that in the three weeks since the initiative was launched, an "increased patrol presence" has led to a decrease of 36 percent in apprehensions of children and families crossing the border. But according to Matthew Simpson, policy strategist for ACLU Texas, the immigration wave has not caused an increase in crime and the border crisis requires "increased humanitarian aid, not more law enforcement."
"Through an enforcement and now military approach, the governor and state leaders divert needed resources from a more appropriate humanitarian response," Simpson said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Texas Governor Rick Perry announced on Tuesday that he is sending 1,000 National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border to stem the tide of children and families attempting to emigrate from several Central American countries.
Adj. Gen. John Nichols, commander of the Texas National Guard, said the troops would be "referring and deterring" people who are intercepted at the border, although the National Guard does have the authority under state law to make arrests.
Human rights groups and Democrats said the move was politically motivated and served to further militarize the border, rather than help children who are seeking refuge in the U.S.
Terri Burke, executive director of ACLU Texas, stated, "These are children who are running into the arms of the Border Patrol agents. They aren't sneaking in... They have come to escape the violence and crime in their own countries. Yet Governor Perry insists on needlessly further militarizing our border for what can only be interpreted as a political stunt."
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) tweeted:
The Texas Democratic Party said Perry, who is running for president in 2016, was more concerned with "continuing his routine of photo-op politics to further his presidential aspirations" than trying to solve the border crisis.
Perry has long been an outspoken critic of the federal government's effort to address the immigration issue. "I will not stand idly by while our citizens are under assault," he said during a press conference, adding that the government's "lip service and empty promises" have prompted this newest action. The initiative, which the governor dubbed "Operation Strong Safety," will cost Texas approximately $12 million a month. Perry did not elaborate on how it would be paid for.
Critics said the resources should be used for humanitarian aid rather than law enforcement.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest argued that Perry's initiative is misguided. "Gov. Perry has referred repeatedly to his desire to make a symbolic statement to the people of Central America that the border is closed, and he thinks that the best way to do that is to send a thousand National Guard troops to the border," Earnest said. "It seems to me that a much more powerful symbol would be the bipartisan passage of legislation that would actually make a historic investment in border security and send an additional 20,000 personnel to the border," referring to recent immigration legislation that passed in the U.S. Senate but remains stalled in the House of Representatives.
Perry claimed that in the three weeks since the initiative was launched, an "increased patrol presence" has led to a decrease of 36 percent in apprehensions of children and families crossing the border. But according to Matthew Simpson, policy strategist for ACLU Texas, the immigration wave has not caused an increase in crime and the border crisis requires "increased humanitarian aid, not more law enforcement."
"Through an enforcement and now military approach, the governor and state leaders divert needed resources from a more appropriate humanitarian response," Simpson said.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Texas Governor Rick Perry announced on Tuesday that he is sending 1,000 National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border to stem the tide of children and families attempting to emigrate from several Central American countries.
Adj. Gen. John Nichols, commander of the Texas National Guard, said the troops would be "referring and deterring" people who are intercepted at the border, although the National Guard does have the authority under state law to make arrests.
Human rights groups and Democrats said the move was politically motivated and served to further militarize the border, rather than help children who are seeking refuge in the U.S.
Terri Burke, executive director of ACLU Texas, stated, "These are children who are running into the arms of the Border Patrol agents. They aren't sneaking in... They have come to escape the violence and crime in their own countries. Yet Governor Perry insists on needlessly further militarizing our border for what can only be interpreted as a political stunt."
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) tweeted:
The Texas Democratic Party said Perry, who is running for president in 2016, was more concerned with "continuing his routine of photo-op politics to further his presidential aspirations" than trying to solve the border crisis.
Perry has long been an outspoken critic of the federal government's effort to address the immigration issue. "I will not stand idly by while our citizens are under assault," he said during a press conference, adding that the government's "lip service and empty promises" have prompted this newest action. The initiative, which the governor dubbed "Operation Strong Safety," will cost Texas approximately $12 million a month. Perry did not elaborate on how it would be paid for.
Critics said the resources should be used for humanitarian aid rather than law enforcement.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest argued that Perry's initiative is misguided. "Gov. Perry has referred repeatedly to his desire to make a symbolic statement to the people of Central America that the border is closed, and he thinks that the best way to do that is to send a thousand National Guard troops to the border," Earnest said. "It seems to me that a much more powerful symbol would be the bipartisan passage of legislation that would actually make a historic investment in border security and send an additional 20,000 personnel to the border," referring to recent immigration legislation that passed in the U.S. Senate but remains stalled in the House of Representatives.
Perry claimed that in the three weeks since the initiative was launched, an "increased patrol presence" has led to a decrease of 36 percent in apprehensions of children and families crossing the border. But according to Matthew Simpson, policy strategist for ACLU Texas, the immigration wave has not caused an increase in crime and the border crisis requires "increased humanitarian aid, not more law enforcement."
"Through an enforcement and now military approach, the governor and state leaders divert needed resources from a more appropriate humanitarian response," Simpson said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.