(Photo: Debra Sweet / Flickr Creative Commons)
Jul 09, 2014
Lawyers for the Obama administration declared in a court document filed Tuesday that people detained by the U.S. at the Guantanamo Bay prison are not "persons" protected by the U.S. Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
The argument came in response to a lawsuit filed on behalf of two men held at Guantanamo--Emad Hassan from Pakistan and Ahmed Rabbani from Yemen--charging that if the U.S. Supreme Court granted the corporation Hobby Lobby the status of a protected "person" under the RFRA, people incarcerated at the offshore prison should also be afforded religious protections.
"It is staggering that the Obama administration is prepared to argue that Guantanamo prisoners aren't people, while accepting that corporations are." --Cori Crider, Reprieve
Department of Justice lawyers disagreed, endorsing what they say is the precedent of the District Court in Washington, D.C. "which holds that Guantanamo detainees, as nonresident aliens outside the United States sovereign territory, are not protected 'person[s]' within the meaning and scope of RFRA," according to the filing.
Cori Crider, attorney for human rights organization Reprieve, which represents Hassan and Rabbani, slammed the argument in a statement released Wednesday: "It is staggering that the Obama administration is prepared to argue that Guantanamo prisoners aren't people, while accepting that corporations are."
Hassan and Rabbani, who have been held since 2002 without charge or trial, accuse prison authorities of violating their religious rights by preventing them from participating in communal tarawih prayers during the ongoing 2014 holy month of Ramadan due to their participation in a hunger strike.
The accusations come amid mounting evidence that the U.S. military has denied the religious and human rights of people detained at Guantanamo, from torture to denial of due process to intentional destruction and desecration of the Qur'an.
"I fail to see how the President can stand up and claim Guantanamo is a scandal while his lawyers call detainees non-persons in court," said Crider. "If the President is serious about closing this prison, he could start by recognizing that its inmates are people - most of whom have been cleared by his own Government."
_____________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Lawyers for the Obama administration declared in a court document filed Tuesday that people detained by the U.S. at the Guantanamo Bay prison are not "persons" protected by the U.S. Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
The argument came in response to a lawsuit filed on behalf of two men held at Guantanamo--Emad Hassan from Pakistan and Ahmed Rabbani from Yemen--charging that if the U.S. Supreme Court granted the corporation Hobby Lobby the status of a protected "person" under the RFRA, people incarcerated at the offshore prison should also be afforded religious protections.
"It is staggering that the Obama administration is prepared to argue that Guantanamo prisoners aren't people, while accepting that corporations are." --Cori Crider, Reprieve
Department of Justice lawyers disagreed, endorsing what they say is the precedent of the District Court in Washington, D.C. "which holds that Guantanamo detainees, as nonresident aliens outside the United States sovereign territory, are not protected 'person[s]' within the meaning and scope of RFRA," according to the filing.
Cori Crider, attorney for human rights organization Reprieve, which represents Hassan and Rabbani, slammed the argument in a statement released Wednesday: "It is staggering that the Obama administration is prepared to argue that Guantanamo prisoners aren't people, while accepting that corporations are."
Hassan and Rabbani, who have been held since 2002 without charge or trial, accuse prison authorities of violating their religious rights by preventing them from participating in communal tarawih prayers during the ongoing 2014 holy month of Ramadan due to their participation in a hunger strike.
The accusations come amid mounting evidence that the U.S. military has denied the religious and human rights of people detained at Guantanamo, from torture to denial of due process to intentional destruction and desecration of the Qur'an.
"I fail to see how the President can stand up and claim Guantanamo is a scandal while his lawyers call detainees non-persons in court," said Crider. "If the President is serious about closing this prison, he could start by recognizing that its inmates are people - most of whom have been cleared by his own Government."
_____________________
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Lawyers for the Obama administration declared in a court document filed Tuesday that people detained by the U.S. at the Guantanamo Bay prison are not "persons" protected by the U.S. Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
The argument came in response to a lawsuit filed on behalf of two men held at Guantanamo--Emad Hassan from Pakistan and Ahmed Rabbani from Yemen--charging that if the U.S. Supreme Court granted the corporation Hobby Lobby the status of a protected "person" under the RFRA, people incarcerated at the offshore prison should also be afforded religious protections.
"It is staggering that the Obama administration is prepared to argue that Guantanamo prisoners aren't people, while accepting that corporations are." --Cori Crider, Reprieve
Department of Justice lawyers disagreed, endorsing what they say is the precedent of the District Court in Washington, D.C. "which holds that Guantanamo detainees, as nonresident aliens outside the United States sovereign territory, are not protected 'person[s]' within the meaning and scope of RFRA," according to the filing.
Cori Crider, attorney for human rights organization Reprieve, which represents Hassan and Rabbani, slammed the argument in a statement released Wednesday: "It is staggering that the Obama administration is prepared to argue that Guantanamo prisoners aren't people, while accepting that corporations are."
Hassan and Rabbani, who have been held since 2002 without charge or trial, accuse prison authorities of violating their religious rights by preventing them from participating in communal tarawih prayers during the ongoing 2014 holy month of Ramadan due to their participation in a hunger strike.
The accusations come amid mounting evidence that the U.S. military has denied the religious and human rights of people detained at Guantanamo, from torture to denial of due process to intentional destruction and desecration of the Qur'an.
"I fail to see how the President can stand up and claim Guantanamo is a scandal while his lawyers call detainees non-persons in court," said Crider. "If the President is serious about closing this prison, he could start by recognizing that its inmates are people - most of whom have been cleared by his own Government."
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.