SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Consigned to Financial Ruin': Evictions Fueling Economic Disadvantage
Low-income black women face disproportionately high eviction rates that fuel cycle of poverty, study finds
Jun 25, 2014
Black women in disadvantaged neighborhoods are the most likely to be evicted from their homes, at a level on par with incarceration rates among poor black men, a MacArthur Foundation study reports.
The high levels of eviction set off 'a chain of hardship' that perpetuates the cycle of poverty in the inner city.
The study, which conducted a long-term examination of the trend in two low-income communities in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, found that while black women make up only 9.6 percent of the city's population, they represent 30 percent of evictions. The statistic is particularly relevant in Milwaukee, the second-most segregated city in the United States behind Detroit; with 16,000 adults and children kicked out of 6,000 homes every year in an area populated by fewer than 105,000 households, the eviction rate in the city averages out to 16 families a day. Women in these areas are most often the sole lease holders.
The report also analyzed an eviction court survey which revealed a population that was "predominantly black (74 percent) and poor. The majority paid at least 50 percent of their incomes for rent.... Only 6 percent received housing assistance."
Overall, one in 17 women in high-poverty black and Hispanic neighborhoods faces eviction, compared to one in 33 men.
A number of issues factor into these statistics. Women are paid less on average, particularly when living paycheck-to-paycheck, and are more likely to have dependents, which increases cost of living on a stagnant income. These complications are often compounded by lasting negative consequences from previous evictions, which can prevent people from qualifying for housing assistance or have caused them to lose their possessions as well as their homes. Men in high-poverty areas are also less likely to be lease holders due to high criminal conviction rates.
At this rate, eviction levels among low-income black women are comparable with incarceration rates among low-income black men, the report, by Harvard sociologist Matthew Desmond, says. "Both phenomena work together to propagate economic disadvantage in the inner city."
In 1997, Desmond notes, the fair market rent for a one-bedroom apartment in Milwaukee was $466, and eventually rose to $665 by 2008; throughout that time, monthly welfare payments stayed at $673.
"The average cost of rent, even in high-poverty neighborhoods, is quickly approaching the total income of welfare recipients," Desmond has written. "The fundamental issue is this: the high cost of housing is consigning the urban poor to financial ruin."
This chain of hardship is also reflected in housing courts, where 90 percent of tenants facing eviction are not represented by attorneys, while 90 percent of landlords are.
Yet recent small-scale efforts by legal assistance programs to support indigent families have proven to be cost-effective; utilizing funds from larger government programs like the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, stopgap solutions have lowered evictions in Milwaukee by 15 percent. A South Bronx legal assistance program that cost $450,000 to initiate eventually saved New York City $700,000 in shelter costs.
Effective measures are those that focus on "directing aid upstream," the report says.
"The most important policy solution, however, would be to ensure that low-income families do not end up in eviction court in the first place," Desmond writes.
"We are learning that eviction is a cause, not just a condition, of poverty."
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Black women in disadvantaged neighborhoods are the most likely to be evicted from their homes, at a level on par with incarceration rates among poor black men, a MacArthur Foundation study reports.
The high levels of eviction set off 'a chain of hardship' that perpetuates the cycle of poverty in the inner city.
The study, which conducted a long-term examination of the trend in two low-income communities in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, found that while black women make up only 9.6 percent of the city's population, they represent 30 percent of evictions. The statistic is particularly relevant in Milwaukee, the second-most segregated city in the United States behind Detroit; with 16,000 adults and children kicked out of 6,000 homes every year in an area populated by fewer than 105,000 households, the eviction rate in the city averages out to 16 families a day. Women in these areas are most often the sole lease holders.
The report also analyzed an eviction court survey which revealed a population that was "predominantly black (74 percent) and poor. The majority paid at least 50 percent of their incomes for rent.... Only 6 percent received housing assistance."
Overall, one in 17 women in high-poverty black and Hispanic neighborhoods faces eviction, compared to one in 33 men.
A number of issues factor into these statistics. Women are paid less on average, particularly when living paycheck-to-paycheck, and are more likely to have dependents, which increases cost of living on a stagnant income. These complications are often compounded by lasting negative consequences from previous evictions, which can prevent people from qualifying for housing assistance or have caused them to lose their possessions as well as their homes. Men in high-poverty areas are also less likely to be lease holders due to high criminal conviction rates.
At this rate, eviction levels among low-income black women are comparable with incarceration rates among low-income black men, the report, by Harvard sociologist Matthew Desmond, says. "Both phenomena work together to propagate economic disadvantage in the inner city."
In 1997, Desmond notes, the fair market rent for a one-bedroom apartment in Milwaukee was $466, and eventually rose to $665 by 2008; throughout that time, monthly welfare payments stayed at $673.
"The average cost of rent, even in high-poverty neighborhoods, is quickly approaching the total income of welfare recipients," Desmond has written. "The fundamental issue is this: the high cost of housing is consigning the urban poor to financial ruin."
This chain of hardship is also reflected in housing courts, where 90 percent of tenants facing eviction are not represented by attorneys, while 90 percent of landlords are.
Yet recent small-scale efforts by legal assistance programs to support indigent families have proven to be cost-effective; utilizing funds from larger government programs like the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, stopgap solutions have lowered evictions in Milwaukee by 15 percent. A South Bronx legal assistance program that cost $450,000 to initiate eventually saved New York City $700,000 in shelter costs.
Effective measures are those that focus on "directing aid upstream," the report says.
"The most important policy solution, however, would be to ensure that low-income families do not end up in eviction court in the first place," Desmond writes.
"We are learning that eviction is a cause, not just a condition, of poverty."
_____________________
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Black women in disadvantaged neighborhoods are the most likely to be evicted from their homes, at a level on par with incarceration rates among poor black men, a MacArthur Foundation study reports.
The high levels of eviction set off 'a chain of hardship' that perpetuates the cycle of poverty in the inner city.
The study, which conducted a long-term examination of the trend in two low-income communities in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, found that while black women make up only 9.6 percent of the city's population, they represent 30 percent of evictions. The statistic is particularly relevant in Milwaukee, the second-most segregated city in the United States behind Detroit; with 16,000 adults and children kicked out of 6,000 homes every year in an area populated by fewer than 105,000 households, the eviction rate in the city averages out to 16 families a day. Women in these areas are most often the sole lease holders.
The report also analyzed an eviction court survey which revealed a population that was "predominantly black (74 percent) and poor. The majority paid at least 50 percent of their incomes for rent.... Only 6 percent received housing assistance."
Overall, one in 17 women in high-poverty black and Hispanic neighborhoods faces eviction, compared to one in 33 men.
A number of issues factor into these statistics. Women are paid less on average, particularly when living paycheck-to-paycheck, and are more likely to have dependents, which increases cost of living on a stagnant income. These complications are often compounded by lasting negative consequences from previous evictions, which can prevent people from qualifying for housing assistance or have caused them to lose their possessions as well as their homes. Men in high-poverty areas are also less likely to be lease holders due to high criminal conviction rates.
At this rate, eviction levels among low-income black women are comparable with incarceration rates among low-income black men, the report, by Harvard sociologist Matthew Desmond, says. "Both phenomena work together to propagate economic disadvantage in the inner city."
In 1997, Desmond notes, the fair market rent for a one-bedroom apartment in Milwaukee was $466, and eventually rose to $665 by 2008; throughout that time, monthly welfare payments stayed at $673.
"The average cost of rent, even in high-poverty neighborhoods, is quickly approaching the total income of welfare recipients," Desmond has written. "The fundamental issue is this: the high cost of housing is consigning the urban poor to financial ruin."
This chain of hardship is also reflected in housing courts, where 90 percent of tenants facing eviction are not represented by attorneys, while 90 percent of landlords are.
Yet recent small-scale efforts by legal assistance programs to support indigent families have proven to be cost-effective; utilizing funds from larger government programs like the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, stopgap solutions have lowered evictions in Milwaukee by 15 percent. A South Bronx legal assistance program that cost $450,000 to initiate eventually saved New York City $700,000 in shelter costs.
Effective measures are those that focus on "directing aid upstream," the report says.
"The most important policy solution, however, would be to ensure that low-income families do not end up in eviction court in the first place," Desmond writes.
"We are learning that eviction is a cause, not just a condition, of poverty."
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.