SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Photo: Justin Norman/flickr
News Outlets: Public Must See 'What Is Done in Their Name at Gitmo'
Sixteen news oganizations file motion to release video evidence of forcible cell extractions, force-feedings of Guantanamo prisoner
Jun 21, 2014
A group of news organizations on Friday filed a motion (pdf) in a federal court seeking the right of the public to see videotape evidence of force-feedings of a Guantanamo detainee in order to be able to "exercise democratic oversight of its Government."
The 16 news organizations, which include the McClatchy Company, First Look Media, the Guardian US, Reuters and the Washington Post, seek to intervene in the case of Abu Wa'el Dhiab, a 42-year-old Syrian man who has been held at the offshore prison for over ten years without charge, and was cleared for release in 2009. With no other recourse, he has turned to a hunger strike.
In the case in which the news outlets seek to intervene, Dhiab is seeking a stop to his forcible cell extractions and "torturous" force-feedings.
The government was ordered last month to release to Dhiab's lawyers video of his force-feedings, but the evidence is classified as "Secret" by the government and as such the public has been prevented from viewing it. Yet "the public has a qualified right under both the First Amendment and the common law to inspect and copy this evidence," the news outlets state.
Dhiab's lawyers with the charity Reprieve who have seen the video evidence described it as "extraordinarily disturbing."
"Although the Government has classified the videotapes, it is no secret that force-feeding is being used at Guantanamo; nor is there any secret regarding how it is used," the news organizations' motion states.
"Specifically, the Press Applicants seek to unseal videotape evidence submitted in connection with petitioner's efforts to stop the Government from forcibly feeding him, utilizing procedures that he contends constitute 'torture' and violate his rights, and that this Court has described as 'painful, humiliating and degrading,'" it adds.
"The public is entitled to view this evidence to satisfy itself of the fairness of the outcome of this proceeding and to exercise democratic oversight of its Government," the motion states.
Reprieve welcomed the court motion as a step towards lifting the veil of secrecy over what transpires at the prison.
"It's very welcome that the U.S. media is defending Americans' right to know what is being done in their name at Guantanamo, and a scandal that the Obama administration apparently wants to keep the truth from them," Cori Crider, Reprieve attorney for Dhiab, said in a statement.
"The government keeps implying that the force-feeding tapes contain only uncontroversial material--so they ought to put up, and produce a public version of this footage, or shut up," Crider stated.
__________________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A group of news organizations on Friday filed a motion (pdf) in a federal court seeking the right of the public to see videotape evidence of force-feedings of a Guantanamo detainee in order to be able to "exercise democratic oversight of its Government."
The 16 news organizations, which include the McClatchy Company, First Look Media, the Guardian US, Reuters and the Washington Post, seek to intervene in the case of Abu Wa'el Dhiab, a 42-year-old Syrian man who has been held at the offshore prison for over ten years without charge, and was cleared for release in 2009. With no other recourse, he has turned to a hunger strike.
In the case in which the news outlets seek to intervene, Dhiab is seeking a stop to his forcible cell extractions and "torturous" force-feedings.
The government was ordered last month to release to Dhiab's lawyers video of his force-feedings, but the evidence is classified as "Secret" by the government and as such the public has been prevented from viewing it. Yet "the public has a qualified right under both the First Amendment and the common law to inspect and copy this evidence," the news outlets state.
Dhiab's lawyers with the charity Reprieve who have seen the video evidence described it as "extraordinarily disturbing."
"Although the Government has classified the videotapes, it is no secret that force-feeding is being used at Guantanamo; nor is there any secret regarding how it is used," the news organizations' motion states.
"Specifically, the Press Applicants seek to unseal videotape evidence submitted in connection with petitioner's efforts to stop the Government from forcibly feeding him, utilizing procedures that he contends constitute 'torture' and violate his rights, and that this Court has described as 'painful, humiliating and degrading,'" it adds.
"The public is entitled to view this evidence to satisfy itself of the fairness of the outcome of this proceeding and to exercise democratic oversight of its Government," the motion states.
Reprieve welcomed the court motion as a step towards lifting the veil of secrecy over what transpires at the prison.
"It's very welcome that the U.S. media is defending Americans' right to know what is being done in their name at Guantanamo, and a scandal that the Obama administration apparently wants to keep the truth from them," Cori Crider, Reprieve attorney for Dhiab, said in a statement.
"The government keeps implying that the force-feeding tapes contain only uncontroversial material--so they ought to put up, and produce a public version of this footage, or shut up," Crider stated.
__________________________________
A group of news organizations on Friday filed a motion (pdf) in a federal court seeking the right of the public to see videotape evidence of force-feedings of a Guantanamo detainee in order to be able to "exercise democratic oversight of its Government."
The 16 news organizations, which include the McClatchy Company, First Look Media, the Guardian US, Reuters and the Washington Post, seek to intervene in the case of Abu Wa'el Dhiab, a 42-year-old Syrian man who has been held at the offshore prison for over ten years without charge, and was cleared for release in 2009. With no other recourse, he has turned to a hunger strike.
In the case in which the news outlets seek to intervene, Dhiab is seeking a stop to his forcible cell extractions and "torturous" force-feedings.
The government was ordered last month to release to Dhiab's lawyers video of his force-feedings, but the evidence is classified as "Secret" by the government and as such the public has been prevented from viewing it. Yet "the public has a qualified right under both the First Amendment and the common law to inspect and copy this evidence," the news outlets state.
Dhiab's lawyers with the charity Reprieve who have seen the video evidence described it as "extraordinarily disturbing."
"Although the Government has classified the videotapes, it is no secret that force-feeding is being used at Guantanamo; nor is there any secret regarding how it is used," the news organizations' motion states.
"Specifically, the Press Applicants seek to unseal videotape evidence submitted in connection with petitioner's efforts to stop the Government from forcibly feeding him, utilizing procedures that he contends constitute 'torture' and violate his rights, and that this Court has described as 'painful, humiliating and degrading,'" it adds.
"The public is entitled to view this evidence to satisfy itself of the fairness of the outcome of this proceeding and to exercise democratic oversight of its Government," the motion states.
Reprieve welcomed the court motion as a step towards lifting the veil of secrecy over what transpires at the prison.
"It's very welcome that the U.S. media is defending Americans' right to know what is being done in their name at Guantanamo, and a scandal that the Obama administration apparently wants to keep the truth from them," Cori Crider, Reprieve attorney for Dhiab, said in a statement.
"The government keeps implying that the force-feeding tapes contain only uncontroversial material--so they ought to put up, and produce a public version of this footage, or shut up," Crider stated.
__________________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.