SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Photo: Justin Norman/flickr
A group of news organizations on Friday filed a motion (pdf) in a federal court seeking the right of the public to see videotape evidence of force-feedings of a Guantanamo detainee in order to be able to "exercise democratic oversight of its Government."
The 16 news organizations, which include the McClatchy Company, First Look Media, the Guardian US, Reuters and the Washington Post, seek to intervene in the case of Abu Wa'el Dhiab, a 42-year-old Syrian man who has been held at the offshore prison for over ten years without charge, and was cleared for release in 2009. With no other recourse, he has turned to a hunger strike.
In the case in which the news outlets seek to intervene, Dhiab is seeking a stop to his forcible cell extractions and "torturous" force-feedings.
The government was ordered last month to release to Dhiab's lawyers video of his force-feedings, but the evidence is classified as "Secret" by the government and as such the public has been prevented from viewing it. Yet "the public has a qualified right under both the First Amendment and the common law to inspect and copy this evidence," the news outlets state.
Dhiab's lawyers with the charity Reprieve who have seen the video evidence described it as "extraordinarily disturbing."
"Although the Government has classified the videotapes, it is no secret that force-feeding is being used at Guantanamo; nor is there any secret regarding how it is used," the news organizations' motion states.
"Specifically, the Press Applicants seek to unseal videotape evidence submitted in connection with petitioner's efforts to stop the Government from forcibly feeding him, utilizing procedures that he contends constitute 'torture' and violate his rights, and that this Court has described as 'painful, humiliating and degrading,'" it adds.
"The public is entitled to view this evidence to satisfy itself of the fairness of the outcome of this proceeding and to exercise democratic oversight of its Government," the motion states.
Reprieve welcomed the court motion as a step towards lifting the veil of secrecy over what transpires at the prison.
"It's very welcome that the U.S. media is defending Americans' right to know what is being done in their name at Guantanamo, and a scandal that the Obama administration apparently wants to keep the truth from them," Cori Crider, Reprieve attorney for Dhiab, said in a statement.
"The government keeps implying that the force-feeding tapes contain only uncontroversial material--so they ought to put up, and produce a public version of this footage, or shut up," Crider stated.
__________________________________
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
A group of news organizations on Friday filed a motion (pdf) in a federal court seeking the right of the public to see videotape evidence of force-feedings of a Guantanamo detainee in order to be able to "exercise democratic oversight of its Government."
The 16 news organizations, which include the McClatchy Company, First Look Media, the Guardian US, Reuters and the Washington Post, seek to intervene in the case of Abu Wa'el Dhiab, a 42-year-old Syrian man who has been held at the offshore prison for over ten years without charge, and was cleared for release in 2009. With no other recourse, he has turned to a hunger strike.
In the case in which the news outlets seek to intervene, Dhiab is seeking a stop to his forcible cell extractions and "torturous" force-feedings.
The government was ordered last month to release to Dhiab's lawyers video of his force-feedings, but the evidence is classified as "Secret" by the government and as such the public has been prevented from viewing it. Yet "the public has a qualified right under both the First Amendment and the common law to inspect and copy this evidence," the news outlets state.
Dhiab's lawyers with the charity Reprieve who have seen the video evidence described it as "extraordinarily disturbing."
"Although the Government has classified the videotapes, it is no secret that force-feeding is being used at Guantanamo; nor is there any secret regarding how it is used," the news organizations' motion states.
"Specifically, the Press Applicants seek to unseal videotape evidence submitted in connection with petitioner's efforts to stop the Government from forcibly feeding him, utilizing procedures that he contends constitute 'torture' and violate his rights, and that this Court has described as 'painful, humiliating and degrading,'" it adds.
"The public is entitled to view this evidence to satisfy itself of the fairness of the outcome of this proceeding and to exercise democratic oversight of its Government," the motion states.
Reprieve welcomed the court motion as a step towards lifting the veil of secrecy over what transpires at the prison.
"It's very welcome that the U.S. media is defending Americans' right to know what is being done in their name at Guantanamo, and a scandal that the Obama administration apparently wants to keep the truth from them," Cori Crider, Reprieve attorney for Dhiab, said in a statement.
"The government keeps implying that the force-feeding tapes contain only uncontroversial material--so they ought to put up, and produce a public version of this footage, or shut up," Crider stated.
__________________________________
A group of news organizations on Friday filed a motion (pdf) in a federal court seeking the right of the public to see videotape evidence of force-feedings of a Guantanamo detainee in order to be able to "exercise democratic oversight of its Government."
The 16 news organizations, which include the McClatchy Company, First Look Media, the Guardian US, Reuters and the Washington Post, seek to intervene in the case of Abu Wa'el Dhiab, a 42-year-old Syrian man who has been held at the offshore prison for over ten years without charge, and was cleared for release in 2009. With no other recourse, he has turned to a hunger strike.
In the case in which the news outlets seek to intervene, Dhiab is seeking a stop to his forcible cell extractions and "torturous" force-feedings.
The government was ordered last month to release to Dhiab's lawyers video of his force-feedings, but the evidence is classified as "Secret" by the government and as such the public has been prevented from viewing it. Yet "the public has a qualified right under both the First Amendment and the common law to inspect and copy this evidence," the news outlets state.
Dhiab's lawyers with the charity Reprieve who have seen the video evidence described it as "extraordinarily disturbing."
"Although the Government has classified the videotapes, it is no secret that force-feeding is being used at Guantanamo; nor is there any secret regarding how it is used," the news organizations' motion states.
"Specifically, the Press Applicants seek to unseal videotape evidence submitted in connection with petitioner's efforts to stop the Government from forcibly feeding him, utilizing procedures that he contends constitute 'torture' and violate his rights, and that this Court has described as 'painful, humiliating and degrading,'" it adds.
"The public is entitled to view this evidence to satisfy itself of the fairness of the outcome of this proceeding and to exercise democratic oversight of its Government," the motion states.
Reprieve welcomed the court motion as a step towards lifting the veil of secrecy over what transpires at the prison.
"It's very welcome that the U.S. media is defending Americans' right to know what is being done in their name at Guantanamo, and a scandal that the Obama administration apparently wants to keep the truth from them," Cori Crider, Reprieve attorney for Dhiab, said in a statement.
"The government keeps implying that the force-feeding tapes contain only uncontroversial material--so they ought to put up, and produce a public version of this footage, or shut up," Crider stated.
__________________________________