SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Nobel Economists Back Call to End Failed 'War on Drugs'
New report says militarized approach to fighting drug trade 'has failed on its own terms' and that new paradigms must be tried
May 07, 2014
Backed by five Nobel economists, numerous experts and government leaders, a new comprehensive report presented in London on Wednesday is calling for the end of the international so-called "war on drugs."
"The drug war's failure has been recognized by public health professionals, security experts, human rights authorities and now some of the world's most respected economists." --John Collins, London School of Economics
The London School of Economics report-- Ending the Drug Wars: Report of the LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy (pdf)--outlines what its authors see as the "enormous negative outcomes and collateral damage" that have followed the militarized effort by governments who declared "war" on the illicit drug trade more than a generation ago and calls of those same governments to redirect taxpayer "resources away from an enforcement-led and prohibition-focused strategy" and instead focus on "proven public health policies of harm reduction and treatment" strategies for drug users.
As the report's forward makes clear:
[Evidence of the global failure related to the "war on drugs"] include mass incarceration in the US, highly repressive policies in Asia, vastcorruption and political destabilisation in Afghanistan and West Africa, immense violence in Latin America, an HIV epidemic in Russia, an acute global shortage of pain medication and the propagation of systematic human rights abuses around the world.
The strategy has failed based on its own terms. Evidence shows that drug prices have been declining while purity has been increasing. This has been despite drastic increases in global enforcement spending. Continuing to spend vast resources on punitive enforcement-led policies, generally at the expense of proven public health policies, can no longer be justified.
The United Nations has for too long tried to enforce a repressive, 'one-size-fits-all' approach. It must now take the lead in advocating a new cooperative international framework based on the fundamental acceptance that different policies will work for different countries and regions.
This new global drug strategy should be based on principles of public health, harm reduction, illicit market impact reduction, expanded access to essential medicines, minimisation of problematic consumption, rigorously monitored regulatory experimentation and an unwavering commitment to principles of human rights.
"The drug war's failure has been recognized by public health professionals, security experts, human rights authorities and now some of the world's most respected economists," said John Collins, coordinator of LSE IDEAS International Drug Policy Project and editor of the report.
And Danny Quah, professor of economics and international development at LSE and chair of the group responsible for the report, explained that world leaders, to whom the report in large part is targeted, "need to recognize that toeing the line on current drug control strategies comes with extraordinary human and financial costs to their citizens and economies."
The report comes as the UN General Assembly prepares to convene a special session on drugs in 2016 in order to review the functioning of the current global drug control system, which numerous agencies, individual experts, and studies have shown is failing miserably.
The new report is being presented to Guatemala's Minister of Interior, Mauricio Lopez Bonilla, at a public event at LSE on Wednesday and Guatemala's President, Otto Perez Molina, is expected to take its findings to international forums such as the United Nations and Organization of American States to help drive reform of global drug policies.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Backed by five Nobel economists, numerous experts and government leaders, a new comprehensive report presented in London on Wednesday is calling for the end of the international so-called "war on drugs."
"The drug war's failure has been recognized by public health professionals, security experts, human rights authorities and now some of the world's most respected economists." --John Collins, London School of Economics
The London School of Economics report-- Ending the Drug Wars: Report of the LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy (pdf)--outlines what its authors see as the "enormous negative outcomes and collateral damage" that have followed the militarized effort by governments who declared "war" on the illicit drug trade more than a generation ago and calls of those same governments to redirect taxpayer "resources away from an enforcement-led and prohibition-focused strategy" and instead focus on "proven public health policies of harm reduction and treatment" strategies for drug users.
As the report's forward makes clear:
[Evidence of the global failure related to the "war on drugs"] include mass incarceration in the US, highly repressive policies in Asia, vastcorruption and political destabilisation in Afghanistan and West Africa, immense violence in Latin America, an HIV epidemic in Russia, an acute global shortage of pain medication and the propagation of systematic human rights abuses around the world.
The strategy has failed based on its own terms. Evidence shows that drug prices have been declining while purity has been increasing. This has been despite drastic increases in global enforcement spending. Continuing to spend vast resources on punitive enforcement-led policies, generally at the expense of proven public health policies, can no longer be justified.
The United Nations has for too long tried to enforce a repressive, 'one-size-fits-all' approach. It must now take the lead in advocating a new cooperative international framework based on the fundamental acceptance that different policies will work for different countries and regions.
This new global drug strategy should be based on principles of public health, harm reduction, illicit market impact reduction, expanded access to essential medicines, minimisation of problematic consumption, rigorously monitored regulatory experimentation and an unwavering commitment to principles of human rights.
"The drug war's failure has been recognized by public health professionals, security experts, human rights authorities and now some of the world's most respected economists," said John Collins, coordinator of LSE IDEAS International Drug Policy Project and editor of the report.
And Danny Quah, professor of economics and international development at LSE and chair of the group responsible for the report, explained that world leaders, to whom the report in large part is targeted, "need to recognize that toeing the line on current drug control strategies comes with extraordinary human and financial costs to their citizens and economies."
The report comes as the UN General Assembly prepares to convene a special session on drugs in 2016 in order to review the functioning of the current global drug control system, which numerous agencies, individual experts, and studies have shown is failing miserably.
The new report is being presented to Guatemala's Minister of Interior, Mauricio Lopez Bonilla, at a public event at LSE on Wednesday and Guatemala's President, Otto Perez Molina, is expected to take its findings to international forums such as the United Nations and Organization of American States to help drive reform of global drug policies.
Backed by five Nobel economists, numerous experts and government leaders, a new comprehensive report presented in London on Wednesday is calling for the end of the international so-called "war on drugs."
"The drug war's failure has been recognized by public health professionals, security experts, human rights authorities and now some of the world's most respected economists." --John Collins, London School of Economics
The London School of Economics report-- Ending the Drug Wars: Report of the LSE Expert Group on the Economics of Drug Policy (pdf)--outlines what its authors see as the "enormous negative outcomes and collateral damage" that have followed the militarized effort by governments who declared "war" on the illicit drug trade more than a generation ago and calls of those same governments to redirect taxpayer "resources away from an enforcement-led and prohibition-focused strategy" and instead focus on "proven public health policies of harm reduction and treatment" strategies for drug users.
As the report's forward makes clear:
[Evidence of the global failure related to the "war on drugs"] include mass incarceration in the US, highly repressive policies in Asia, vastcorruption and political destabilisation in Afghanistan and West Africa, immense violence in Latin America, an HIV epidemic in Russia, an acute global shortage of pain medication and the propagation of systematic human rights abuses around the world.
The strategy has failed based on its own terms. Evidence shows that drug prices have been declining while purity has been increasing. This has been despite drastic increases in global enforcement spending. Continuing to spend vast resources on punitive enforcement-led policies, generally at the expense of proven public health policies, can no longer be justified.
The United Nations has for too long tried to enforce a repressive, 'one-size-fits-all' approach. It must now take the lead in advocating a new cooperative international framework based on the fundamental acceptance that different policies will work for different countries and regions.
This new global drug strategy should be based on principles of public health, harm reduction, illicit market impact reduction, expanded access to essential medicines, minimisation of problematic consumption, rigorously monitored regulatory experimentation and an unwavering commitment to principles of human rights.
"The drug war's failure has been recognized by public health professionals, security experts, human rights authorities and now some of the world's most respected economists," said John Collins, coordinator of LSE IDEAS International Drug Policy Project and editor of the report.
And Danny Quah, professor of economics and international development at LSE and chair of the group responsible for the report, explained that world leaders, to whom the report in large part is targeted, "need to recognize that toeing the line on current drug control strategies comes with extraordinary human and financial costs to their citizens and economies."
The report comes as the UN General Assembly prepares to convene a special session on drugs in 2016 in order to review the functioning of the current global drug control system, which numerous agencies, individual experts, and studies have shown is failing miserably.
The new report is being presented to Guatemala's Minister of Interior, Mauricio Lopez Bonilla, at a public event at LSE on Wednesday and Guatemala's President, Otto Perez Molina, is expected to take its findings to international forums such as the United Nations and Organization of American States to help drive reform of global drug policies.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy