In what is being hailed as a "historic legal challenge" to the United States government, a U.S. court will hear for the first time from a Guantánamo detainee who claims that force-feeding at the U.S. military prison amounts to torture.
Emad Hassan, who is severely ill and suffers from serious internal injuries — which his lawyers at the human rights group Reprieve say are the direct result of force-feeding— has been held without charge since 2002 despite having been cleared for release since 2009.
Hassan has been force-fed 5000 times since 2007 "as part of the military’s efforts to break his hunger strike," said Reprieve.
"All I want is what President Obama promised – my liberty, and fair treatment for others," stated Hassan. "I have been cleared for five years, and I have been force-fed for seven years. This is not a life worth living, it is a life of constant pain and suffering."
"While I do not want to die," he continued, "it is surely my right to protest peacefully without being degraded and abused every day."
The case, Imad Abdullah Hasan v Barack Obama, is the first of its kind and follows a ruling last month in which a U.S. federal court said prisoners at the military prison can now sue over force-feeding, a practice considered by international human rights organizations to be a form of torture.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
If you think a better world is possible, support our people-powered media model today
The corporate media puts the interests of the 1% ahead of all of us. That's wrong. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
If you believe the survival of independent media is vital to a healthy democracy, please step forward with a donation to nonprofit Common Dreams today:
According to Reprieve, Hassan's case "highlights the increasing brutality of the Guantánamo Bay force-feeding process, which the military has amended step-by-step to make it so painful that only the most courageous peaceful protester can continue."
It will be the first case in history to require a U.S. judge to review a Guantánamo prisoner’s detailed testimony "and will force the military to respond," said Reprieve.
“This is the first time that any court will compare what the prisoners are saying about the torturous methods with what the military is saying,” said Clive Stafford Smith, director of Reprieve and the legal counsel in the case, who gave a detailed account of Hassan's ordeal at Guantanamo in his court filing (pdf), which outlines the "sadistic" practices of the force-feeding nurses.
"This case marks an historic step in the long battle to bring basic rights to the legal black hole at Guantánamo Bay," stated Chair of Reprieve U.S. Eric Lewis. "For over a decade, abused prisoners at the US military base have been denied any effective legal mechanism to challenge their treatment. This case calls upon U.S. judges to restore the most basic rights, medical standards and human dignity to these men at Guantánamo Bay.”
Following last month's ruling the U.S. could now be subject to cases brought by the remaining 155 Guantanamo inmates. According to lawyers for the inmates, at least 34 inmates are still on hunger strike, and half of those continue to be force-fed.