SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Protesters dropped this banner during their action on Friday. (Photo via Twitter: LockOutPetrocultures/ @LockoutPetroC)
Activists Target Conference Giving Platform to Fossil Fuel Cheerleaders
We need to reframe the debate to talk about how to move beyond toxic extraction, says spokesperson
Feb 07, 2014
Roughly 30 people entered a McGill University building in Montreal Friday morning with a powerful goal--to highlight the flawed approach to debate on fossil fuel extraction that marginalizes those most affected by the toxic process and fails to address how the world moves beyond a paradigm of perpetual growth.
The target of the group's occupation was a conference entitled Petrocultures 2014: Oil, Energy, and Canada's Future. In a blog post, the group explains that
The framework of this conference positions support for fossil fuel extraction as one valid opinion among others, reducing massive environmental destruction, widespread death and disease, and the continued advancement of Canada's colonial project to intellectual concerns, to be balanced against the promise of cheap energy and growth in profits. No matter their personal convictions, participants in such debate legitimate the pro-tar sands, pro-fracking, colonialist position by granting its defenders a speaking platform and a considered response.
At around 7:45, just over an hour before the conference was set to open, the protesters entered the building. Their first goal, spokesperson Mona Luxion told Common Dreams, was to prevent, or at least make it more difficult, for the event to take place. Already, Luxion said, they achieved a small victory because their action forced the event to move to another building.
Their second goal, Luxion said, was "to raise visibility not only at this conference but around the national debate over fossil fuel extraction."
The framework of reporting everywhere takes the "position that we should be engaging in fossil fuel extraction... that we should keep on mining the tar sands, that we should keep fracking, all of which are toxic processes," she said.
"We don't get to have a debate about how we create an economy in which we don't rely on fossil fuels," she added, so the action on Friday was to critique not only this conference, which gives a platform to advocates of continued extraction, but also to critique the way the debate happens nationally and internationally.
We need to look at "who is present in the conversation," Luxion said, and include in the debate the people faced with "the immediate danger of resource extraction...rather than those voices being marginalized."
"We really need to talk about how to not continue an economy based on perpetual growth with limitless resources. We need to look at the system as a whole."
* * *
Twitter users present at the action kept track of the action using the hashtag #LockoutPetroCultures, which you can see below:
Tweets about "#lockoutpetrocultures"
___________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Roughly 30 people entered a McGill University building in Montreal Friday morning with a powerful goal--to highlight the flawed approach to debate on fossil fuel extraction that marginalizes those most affected by the toxic process and fails to address how the world moves beyond a paradigm of perpetual growth.
The target of the group's occupation was a conference entitled Petrocultures 2014: Oil, Energy, and Canada's Future. In a blog post, the group explains that
The framework of this conference positions support for fossil fuel extraction as one valid opinion among others, reducing massive environmental destruction, widespread death and disease, and the continued advancement of Canada's colonial project to intellectual concerns, to be balanced against the promise of cheap energy and growth in profits. No matter their personal convictions, participants in such debate legitimate the pro-tar sands, pro-fracking, colonialist position by granting its defenders a speaking platform and a considered response.
At around 7:45, just over an hour before the conference was set to open, the protesters entered the building. Their first goal, spokesperson Mona Luxion told Common Dreams, was to prevent, or at least make it more difficult, for the event to take place. Already, Luxion said, they achieved a small victory because their action forced the event to move to another building.
Their second goal, Luxion said, was "to raise visibility not only at this conference but around the national debate over fossil fuel extraction."
The framework of reporting everywhere takes the "position that we should be engaging in fossil fuel extraction... that we should keep on mining the tar sands, that we should keep fracking, all of which are toxic processes," she said.
"We don't get to have a debate about how we create an economy in which we don't rely on fossil fuels," she added, so the action on Friday was to critique not only this conference, which gives a platform to advocates of continued extraction, but also to critique the way the debate happens nationally and internationally.
We need to look at "who is present in the conversation," Luxion said, and include in the debate the people faced with "the immediate danger of resource extraction...rather than those voices being marginalized."
"We really need to talk about how to not continue an economy based on perpetual growth with limitless resources. We need to look at the system as a whole."
* * *
Twitter users present at the action kept track of the action using the hashtag #LockoutPetroCultures, which you can see below:
Tweets about "#lockoutpetrocultures"
___________________
Roughly 30 people entered a McGill University building in Montreal Friday morning with a powerful goal--to highlight the flawed approach to debate on fossil fuel extraction that marginalizes those most affected by the toxic process and fails to address how the world moves beyond a paradigm of perpetual growth.
The target of the group's occupation was a conference entitled Petrocultures 2014: Oil, Energy, and Canada's Future. In a blog post, the group explains that
The framework of this conference positions support for fossil fuel extraction as one valid opinion among others, reducing massive environmental destruction, widespread death and disease, and the continued advancement of Canada's colonial project to intellectual concerns, to be balanced against the promise of cheap energy and growth in profits. No matter their personal convictions, participants in such debate legitimate the pro-tar sands, pro-fracking, colonialist position by granting its defenders a speaking platform and a considered response.
At around 7:45, just over an hour before the conference was set to open, the protesters entered the building. Their first goal, spokesperson Mona Luxion told Common Dreams, was to prevent, or at least make it more difficult, for the event to take place. Already, Luxion said, they achieved a small victory because their action forced the event to move to another building.
Their second goal, Luxion said, was "to raise visibility not only at this conference but around the national debate over fossil fuel extraction."
The framework of reporting everywhere takes the "position that we should be engaging in fossil fuel extraction... that we should keep on mining the tar sands, that we should keep fracking, all of which are toxic processes," she said.
"We don't get to have a debate about how we create an economy in which we don't rely on fossil fuels," she added, so the action on Friday was to critique not only this conference, which gives a platform to advocates of continued extraction, but also to critique the way the debate happens nationally and internationally.
We need to look at "who is present in the conversation," Luxion said, and include in the debate the people faced with "the immediate danger of resource extraction...rather than those voices being marginalized."
"We really need to talk about how to not continue an economy based on perpetual growth with limitless resources. We need to look at the system as a whole."
* * *
Twitter users present at the action kept track of the action using the hashtag #LockoutPetroCultures, which you can see below:
Tweets about "#lockoutpetrocultures"
___________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.