2013: A Year of War on Reproductive Rights
New study finds drastic erosion of abortion rights and access, with 22 states implementing 70 restrictions on abortion

Over the past three years, state-level legislative initiatives have eroded access to abortion and shuttered clinics at a stunning pace. A new study from the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute finds that, in 2013, this trend accelerated and spread, drastically transforming the reproductive rights landscape across the country and entering the new year with considerable momentum.
The report, which was released this week, finds that in 2013, 22 states implemented 70 abortion restrictions. "This makes 2013 second only to 2011 in the number of new abortion restrictions enacted in a single year," the report reads.
Yet, when considered over a longer time frame, this trend is even more extreme. The report explains, "To put recent trends in even sharper relief, 205 abortion restrictions were enacted over the past three years (2011-2013), but just 189 were enacted during the entire previous decade (2001-2010)."
A majority of the restrictions fall under four categories: "abortion bans, restrictions on abortion providers, limitations on the provision of medication abortion and restrictions on coverage of abortion in private health plans," explains the report.
The net effect is transforming reproductive rights and access across the United States. "In 2000, 31% of women of reproductive age lived in one of the 13 states considered hostile to abortion [defined as having at least four major abortion restrictions], but by 2013, 56% of women lived in one of the now 27 hostile states."
The following chart illustrates this trajectory.

The report notes that not all state-level initiatives have curbed reproductive rights. A handful of states passed laws aimed at expanding access to reproductive and sexual health services, including a California law aimed at gradually expanding access to abortion. Yet, this trend is a pittance compared to the nation-wide attack on reproductive rights, the report finds.
"This is still spreading across the country," said Elizabeth Nash, state issues manager for the Guttmacher Institute, in an interview with The Huffington Post. "We've seen a shift from 2011 when much of [the] action took place in Kansas, Arizona and Oklahoma. We're now seeing Texas, Arkansas, North Carolina -- more states are adopting more restrictions."
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

Over the past three years, state-level legislative initiatives have eroded access to abortion and shuttered clinics at a stunning pace. A new study from the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute finds that, in 2013, this trend accelerated and spread, drastically transforming the reproductive rights landscape across the country and entering the new year with considerable momentum.
The report, which was released this week, finds that in 2013, 22 states implemented 70 abortion restrictions. "This makes 2013 second only to 2011 in the number of new abortion restrictions enacted in a single year," the report reads.
Yet, when considered over a longer time frame, this trend is even more extreme. The report explains, "To put recent trends in even sharper relief, 205 abortion restrictions were enacted over the past three years (2011-2013), but just 189 were enacted during the entire previous decade (2001-2010)."
A majority of the restrictions fall under four categories: "abortion bans, restrictions on abortion providers, limitations on the provision of medication abortion and restrictions on coverage of abortion in private health plans," explains the report.
The net effect is transforming reproductive rights and access across the United States. "In 2000, 31% of women of reproductive age lived in one of the 13 states considered hostile to abortion [defined as having at least four major abortion restrictions], but by 2013, 56% of women lived in one of the now 27 hostile states."
The following chart illustrates this trajectory.

The report notes that not all state-level initiatives have curbed reproductive rights. A handful of states passed laws aimed at expanding access to reproductive and sexual health services, including a California law aimed at gradually expanding access to abortion. Yet, this trend is a pittance compared to the nation-wide attack on reproductive rights, the report finds.
"This is still spreading across the country," said Elizabeth Nash, state issues manager for the Guttmacher Institute, in an interview with The Huffington Post. "We've seen a shift from 2011 when much of [the] action took place in Kansas, Arizona and Oklahoma. We're now seeing Texas, Arkansas, North Carolina -- more states are adopting more restrictions."
_____________________

Over the past three years, state-level legislative initiatives have eroded access to abortion and shuttered clinics at a stunning pace. A new study from the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute finds that, in 2013, this trend accelerated and spread, drastically transforming the reproductive rights landscape across the country and entering the new year with considerable momentum.
The report, which was released this week, finds that in 2013, 22 states implemented 70 abortion restrictions. "This makes 2013 second only to 2011 in the number of new abortion restrictions enacted in a single year," the report reads.
Yet, when considered over a longer time frame, this trend is even more extreme. The report explains, "To put recent trends in even sharper relief, 205 abortion restrictions were enacted over the past three years (2011-2013), but just 189 were enacted during the entire previous decade (2001-2010)."
A majority of the restrictions fall under four categories: "abortion bans, restrictions on abortion providers, limitations on the provision of medication abortion and restrictions on coverage of abortion in private health plans," explains the report.
The net effect is transforming reproductive rights and access across the United States. "In 2000, 31% of women of reproductive age lived in one of the 13 states considered hostile to abortion [defined as having at least four major abortion restrictions], but by 2013, 56% of women lived in one of the now 27 hostile states."
The following chart illustrates this trajectory.

The report notes that not all state-level initiatives have curbed reproductive rights. A handful of states passed laws aimed at expanding access to reproductive and sexual health services, including a California law aimed at gradually expanding access to abortion. Yet, this trend is a pittance compared to the nation-wide attack on reproductive rights, the report finds.
"This is still spreading across the country," said Elizabeth Nash, state issues manager for the Guttmacher Institute, in an interview with The Huffington Post. "We've seen a shift from 2011 when much of [the] action took place in Kansas, Arizona and Oklahoma. We're now seeing Texas, Arkansas, North Carolina -- more states are adopting more restrictions."
_____________________

