Jan 02, 2014
The U.S. supposedly handed over control of the military prison, a facility that has been marked by a history of torturous conditions and other human rights abuses, to the Afghan government in March.
However, the U.S. military has maintained its authority within the prison's walls including complete control over 67 non-Afghan prisoners.
The insistence by the U.S. against Afghanistan's planned releases does not bode well for the strained relationship between the two countries still mired in over a decade of war and a contentious bilateral security deal currently being negotiated.
Reuters reports:
Relations with Afghanistan have grown particularly strained over President Hamid Karzai's refusal to sign a bilateral security deal that would keep around 8,000 U.S. troops in the country after 2014, when most foreign forces are due to leave.
A U.S. army official said the release of the 88 contravened a presidential decree to complete investigations at the prison and prosecute individuals when required.
In total 650 prisoners have been marked for release from Bagram. While the U.S. claims that 88 of them are dangerous and linked to violent acts, the head of the Afghan commission charged with reviewing their cases, the Afghan Review Board, said the detainees are not dangerous and "In many cases, detainees were wrongly linked to certain incidents they were not involved in."
According to the New York Times, Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai approved the releases at a cabinet meeting last week but ordered the commission to give the international military coalition and the main Afghan intelligence agency until Friday to produce evidence against the detainees before they are released.
Adding to the pressure, a group of U.S. senators are currently visiting Afghanistan over concerns that Karzai will not sign the contentious security accord proposed by the U.S. that will allow several thousand U.S. soldiers to remain in the country in exchange for billions of dollars in Western aid.
While there, the senators urged Karzai to halt the release of the 88 detainees.
"If these releases go ahead it will do irreparable damage to the relationship," Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told reporters at a news conference in Kabul on Thursday.
_______________________
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
The U.S. supposedly handed over control of the military prison, a facility that has been marked by a history of torturous conditions and other human rights abuses, to the Afghan government in March.
However, the U.S. military has maintained its authority within the prison's walls including complete control over 67 non-Afghan prisoners.
The insistence by the U.S. against Afghanistan's planned releases does not bode well for the strained relationship between the two countries still mired in over a decade of war and a contentious bilateral security deal currently being negotiated.
Reuters reports:
Relations with Afghanistan have grown particularly strained over President Hamid Karzai's refusal to sign a bilateral security deal that would keep around 8,000 U.S. troops in the country after 2014, when most foreign forces are due to leave.
A U.S. army official said the release of the 88 contravened a presidential decree to complete investigations at the prison and prosecute individuals when required.
In total 650 prisoners have been marked for release from Bagram. While the U.S. claims that 88 of them are dangerous and linked to violent acts, the head of the Afghan commission charged with reviewing their cases, the Afghan Review Board, said the detainees are not dangerous and "In many cases, detainees were wrongly linked to certain incidents they were not involved in."
According to the New York Times, Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai approved the releases at a cabinet meeting last week but ordered the commission to give the international military coalition and the main Afghan intelligence agency until Friday to produce evidence against the detainees before they are released.
Adding to the pressure, a group of U.S. senators are currently visiting Afghanistan over concerns that Karzai will not sign the contentious security accord proposed by the U.S. that will allow several thousand U.S. soldiers to remain in the country in exchange for billions of dollars in Western aid.
While there, the senators urged Karzai to halt the release of the 88 detainees.
"If these releases go ahead it will do irreparable damage to the relationship," Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told reporters at a news conference in Kabul on Thursday.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
The U.S. supposedly handed over control of the military prison, a facility that has been marked by a history of torturous conditions and other human rights abuses, to the Afghan government in March.
However, the U.S. military has maintained its authority within the prison's walls including complete control over 67 non-Afghan prisoners.
The insistence by the U.S. against Afghanistan's planned releases does not bode well for the strained relationship between the two countries still mired in over a decade of war and a contentious bilateral security deal currently being negotiated.
Reuters reports:
Relations with Afghanistan have grown particularly strained over President Hamid Karzai's refusal to sign a bilateral security deal that would keep around 8,000 U.S. troops in the country after 2014, when most foreign forces are due to leave.
A U.S. army official said the release of the 88 contravened a presidential decree to complete investigations at the prison and prosecute individuals when required.
In total 650 prisoners have been marked for release from Bagram. While the U.S. claims that 88 of them are dangerous and linked to violent acts, the head of the Afghan commission charged with reviewing their cases, the Afghan Review Board, said the detainees are not dangerous and "In many cases, detainees were wrongly linked to certain incidents they were not involved in."
According to the New York Times, Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai approved the releases at a cabinet meeting last week but ordered the commission to give the international military coalition and the main Afghan intelligence agency until Friday to produce evidence against the detainees before they are released.
Adding to the pressure, a group of U.S. senators are currently visiting Afghanistan over concerns that Karzai will not sign the contentious security accord proposed by the U.S. that will allow several thousand U.S. soldiers to remain in the country in exchange for billions of dollars in Western aid.
While there, the senators urged Karzai to halt the release of the 88 detainees.
"If these releases go ahead it will do irreparable damage to the relationship," Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told reporters at a news conference in Kabul on Thursday.
_______________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.