Dec 17, 2013
The White House announced Wednesday the release of the findings from a presidential advisory committee review of NSA surveillance practices.
Though progressive analysts slammed the review board for being "typical Washington DC whitewash," one official described the recommendations as "significantly more far-reaching than many expected."
Reporting on leaked details, the Washington Postwrites that among the "sweeping technical reforms," the panel advises that the NSA no longer be entrusted with the phone database, estimated by some to contain more than 1 trillion records, according to an official briefed on the review.
The Post continues:
Rather than the NSA, the phone companies or a third party would hold the records, said U.S. officials briefed on the contents.
The 200-page report's 40-plus recommendations, also include barring NSA from asking companies to build "backdoors" into their software so that the government may gain access to encrypted communications. The NSA would also be prevented from undermining global encryption standards and prohibited from stockpiling "zero day" hacking tools that can be used to penetrate computer systems, and in some cases, damage or destroy them, according to the individuals, who were not authorized to speak on the record.
The panel also suggested moving the NSA's information assurance directorate, which is in charge of protecting classified government computer systems, under a separate entity. The idea there would be to separate a clearly defensive mission from the offensive side of NSA, which works to gain access to networks overseas for espionage, and which can be used to enable a military cyber attack on an adversary's computer system.
The Guardian is live blogging the release of the panel report.
Initially, the White House had intended to release the report in January. Following leaked details of the draft late last week, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said the Obama administration is making the report public so that "Americans could judge the contents of the findings themselves."
It is unclear whether the White House will accept any of the panel's ideas. Some U.S. officials have reportedly said the Obama administration has indicated it is "not likely to endorse substantive changes to the phone records program," despite the Monday ruling by a U.S. federal court that the U.S. government "almost certainly" violated the constitution by mass collecting phone use data.
Even before the offical release of the report, Twitter users have been offering reactions:
_____________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The White House announced Wednesday the release of the findings from a presidential advisory committee review of NSA surveillance practices.
Though progressive analysts slammed the review board for being "typical Washington DC whitewash," one official described the recommendations as "significantly more far-reaching than many expected."
Reporting on leaked details, the Washington Postwrites that among the "sweeping technical reforms," the panel advises that the NSA no longer be entrusted with the phone database, estimated by some to contain more than 1 trillion records, according to an official briefed on the review.
The Post continues:
Rather than the NSA, the phone companies or a third party would hold the records, said U.S. officials briefed on the contents.
The 200-page report's 40-plus recommendations, also include barring NSA from asking companies to build "backdoors" into their software so that the government may gain access to encrypted communications. The NSA would also be prevented from undermining global encryption standards and prohibited from stockpiling "zero day" hacking tools that can be used to penetrate computer systems, and in some cases, damage or destroy them, according to the individuals, who were not authorized to speak on the record.
The panel also suggested moving the NSA's information assurance directorate, which is in charge of protecting classified government computer systems, under a separate entity. The idea there would be to separate a clearly defensive mission from the offensive side of NSA, which works to gain access to networks overseas for espionage, and which can be used to enable a military cyber attack on an adversary's computer system.
The Guardian is live blogging the release of the panel report.
Initially, the White House had intended to release the report in January. Following leaked details of the draft late last week, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said the Obama administration is making the report public so that "Americans could judge the contents of the findings themselves."
It is unclear whether the White House will accept any of the panel's ideas. Some U.S. officials have reportedly said the Obama administration has indicated it is "not likely to endorse substantive changes to the phone records program," despite the Monday ruling by a U.S. federal court that the U.S. government "almost certainly" violated the constitution by mass collecting phone use data.
Even before the offical release of the report, Twitter users have been offering reactions:
_____________________
The White House announced Wednesday the release of the findings from a presidential advisory committee review of NSA surveillance practices.
Though progressive analysts slammed the review board for being "typical Washington DC whitewash," one official described the recommendations as "significantly more far-reaching than many expected."
Reporting on leaked details, the Washington Postwrites that among the "sweeping technical reforms," the panel advises that the NSA no longer be entrusted with the phone database, estimated by some to contain more than 1 trillion records, according to an official briefed on the review.
The Post continues:
Rather than the NSA, the phone companies or a third party would hold the records, said U.S. officials briefed on the contents.
The 200-page report's 40-plus recommendations, also include barring NSA from asking companies to build "backdoors" into their software so that the government may gain access to encrypted communications. The NSA would also be prevented from undermining global encryption standards and prohibited from stockpiling "zero day" hacking tools that can be used to penetrate computer systems, and in some cases, damage or destroy them, according to the individuals, who were not authorized to speak on the record.
The panel also suggested moving the NSA's information assurance directorate, which is in charge of protecting classified government computer systems, under a separate entity. The idea there would be to separate a clearly defensive mission from the offensive side of NSA, which works to gain access to networks overseas for espionage, and which can be used to enable a military cyber attack on an adversary's computer system.
The Guardian is live blogging the release of the panel report.
Initially, the White House had intended to release the report in January. Following leaked details of the draft late last week, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said the Obama administration is making the report public so that "Americans could judge the contents of the findings themselves."
It is unclear whether the White House will accept any of the panel's ideas. Some U.S. officials have reportedly said the Obama administration has indicated it is "not likely to endorse substantive changes to the phone records program," despite the Monday ruling by a U.S. federal court that the U.S. government "almost certainly" violated the constitution by mass collecting phone use data.
Even before the offical release of the report, Twitter users have been offering reactions:
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.