

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Appearing Tuesday in an interview with MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell, the Democratic Party powerhouse and Senate Intelligence Committee Chair stated, "It is my belief we live in a world with serious jeopardy to this nation. And those of us on the intelligence committee see this frequently. Therefore, this program, in conjunction with other programs, helps keep this nation safe."
"I'm not saying it's indispensable," Feinstein said of the spying. "But I'm saying it is important."
In the interview, as well as a statement released by Feinstein on Tuesday, the senator asserted her support for the program while calling for the Supreme Court to review its constitutionality. She emphasized other federal cases in which the spying was ruled constitutional in what appeared to be a bid to cast doubt on Monday's ruling.
"Only the Supreme Court can resolve the question on the constitutionality of the NSA's program," asserted Feinstein in her official statement.
"Those of us who support the call records program do so with a sincere belief that it, along with other programs, is constitutional and helps keep the country safe from attack," she added.
Feinstein's statements counter the ruling of U.S. District Judge Judge Richard Leon, who found Monday that NSA spying on nearly every call made within or to the United States violates the Fourth Amendment's ban on unlawful searches and seizures and does not demonstrate any provable role in protecting from "terrorist" attacks.
"I cannot imagine a more 'indiscriminate' and 'arbitrary invasion' than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval," wrote Leon in a 68-page statement released Monday.
While Leon's ruling will not be immediately implemented, pending a government appeal, it constitutes the first successful legal challenge to NSA spying and is being widely vaunted as a potentially pivotal challenge.
Feinstein has been a fervent defender of NSA spying, despite its vast unpopularity and rolling scandals across the globe.
She is currently championing a bill that would expand NSA powers to mass collect phone data--legislation that stands in direct competition to legislative efforts to reign in NSA spying.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

Appearing Tuesday in an interview with MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell, the Democratic Party powerhouse and Senate Intelligence Committee Chair stated, "It is my belief we live in a world with serious jeopardy to this nation. And those of us on the intelligence committee see this frequently. Therefore, this program, in conjunction with other programs, helps keep this nation safe."
"I'm not saying it's indispensable," Feinstein said of the spying. "But I'm saying it is important."
In the interview, as well as a statement released by Feinstein on Tuesday, the senator asserted her support for the program while calling for the Supreme Court to review its constitutionality. She emphasized other federal cases in which the spying was ruled constitutional in what appeared to be a bid to cast doubt on Monday's ruling.
"Only the Supreme Court can resolve the question on the constitutionality of the NSA's program," asserted Feinstein in her official statement.
"Those of us who support the call records program do so with a sincere belief that it, along with other programs, is constitutional and helps keep the country safe from attack," she added.
Feinstein's statements counter the ruling of U.S. District Judge Judge Richard Leon, who found Monday that NSA spying on nearly every call made within or to the United States violates the Fourth Amendment's ban on unlawful searches and seizures and does not demonstrate any provable role in protecting from "terrorist" attacks.
"I cannot imagine a more 'indiscriminate' and 'arbitrary invasion' than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval," wrote Leon in a 68-page statement released Monday.
While Leon's ruling will not be immediately implemented, pending a government appeal, it constitutes the first successful legal challenge to NSA spying and is being widely vaunted as a potentially pivotal challenge.
Feinstein has been a fervent defender of NSA spying, despite its vast unpopularity and rolling scandals across the globe.
She is currently championing a bill that would expand NSA powers to mass collect phone data--legislation that stands in direct competition to legislative efforts to reign in NSA spying.
_____________________

Appearing Tuesday in an interview with MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell, the Democratic Party powerhouse and Senate Intelligence Committee Chair stated, "It is my belief we live in a world with serious jeopardy to this nation. And those of us on the intelligence committee see this frequently. Therefore, this program, in conjunction with other programs, helps keep this nation safe."
"I'm not saying it's indispensable," Feinstein said of the spying. "But I'm saying it is important."
In the interview, as well as a statement released by Feinstein on Tuesday, the senator asserted her support for the program while calling for the Supreme Court to review its constitutionality. She emphasized other federal cases in which the spying was ruled constitutional in what appeared to be a bid to cast doubt on Monday's ruling.
"Only the Supreme Court can resolve the question on the constitutionality of the NSA's program," asserted Feinstein in her official statement.
"Those of us who support the call records program do so with a sincere belief that it, along with other programs, is constitutional and helps keep the country safe from attack," she added.
Feinstein's statements counter the ruling of U.S. District Judge Judge Richard Leon, who found Monday that NSA spying on nearly every call made within or to the United States violates the Fourth Amendment's ban on unlawful searches and seizures and does not demonstrate any provable role in protecting from "terrorist" attacks.
"I cannot imagine a more 'indiscriminate' and 'arbitrary invasion' than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval," wrote Leon in a 68-page statement released Monday.
While Leon's ruling will not be immediately implemented, pending a government appeal, it constitutes the first successful legal challenge to NSA spying and is being widely vaunted as a potentially pivotal challenge.
Feinstein has been a fervent defender of NSA spying, despite its vast unpopularity and rolling scandals across the globe.
She is currently championing a bill that would expand NSA powers to mass collect phone data--legislation that stands in direct competition to legislative efforts to reign in NSA spying.
_____________________