

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

On Wednesday evening, members of the South Portland City Council voted unanimously to create a Draft Ordinance Committee with the explicit purpose of creating a new land-use rule to "prevent the flow and processing of unrefined tar sands in South Portland," local media reports.
"It's very pleasing to see all of us this evening take a stand that we do not want tar sands in our community and that we will not let it happen," said Councilor Tom Blake.
Formal votes to make appointments to the committee and establish a working budget won't take place until the council's Jan. 6 meeting. In the meantime, however, the city will vote on Dec. 16 to adopt a moratorium on any construction that would enable the transport of tar sands via the South Portland harbor.
"[ Big Oil] has come out of the shadows. They've really declared an all-out offensive against the citizens of South Portland." -Rob Sellin, Protect South Portland
The moratorium is expected to pass "handily."
Earlier this month, in response to news of the pending moratorium, a letter drafted by a lawyer with the American Petroleum Institute (API) to members of the city council threatened the moratorium "would have strong legal challenges" if passed. It claims the ruling would be an unconstitutional attempt to regulate interstate commerce.
In November, the Waterfront Protection Ordinance (or WPO)--a measure to prevent the use of the South Portland harbor as a potential location for an alternate tar sands pipeline--was defeated by a scant 192 votes after a coalition of oil giants including Citgo, Irving, and the API dumped hundreds of thousands of dollars into a campaign against the legislation.
Ahead of the November vote, the oil industry made repeated claims that the WPO was premature, saying there was "no proposal to reverse the flow of the Portland-Montreal pipeline" to allow for the transport of tar sands oil from Alberta, Canada to overseas markets.
Despite this, on Dec. 6 a Quebec National Assembly committee voted to reverse the flow of Enbridge's Line 9B pipeline from Alberta to Quebec, a move widely seen by many as the first step in transporting tar sands from Alberta to South Portland.
"Even though Portland Pipe Line Corp. says it has no tar-sands plan, tar sands is on its way," said South Portland resident Crystal Goodrich.
"They've really come out of the shadows," added Rob Sellin, co-founder of the group Protect South Portland. "They've really declared an all-out offensive against the citizens of South Portland and our elected officials."
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

On Wednesday evening, members of the South Portland City Council voted unanimously to create a Draft Ordinance Committee with the explicit purpose of creating a new land-use rule to "prevent the flow and processing of unrefined tar sands in South Portland," local media reports.
"It's very pleasing to see all of us this evening take a stand that we do not want tar sands in our community and that we will not let it happen," said Councilor Tom Blake.
Formal votes to make appointments to the committee and establish a working budget won't take place until the council's Jan. 6 meeting. In the meantime, however, the city will vote on Dec. 16 to adopt a moratorium on any construction that would enable the transport of tar sands via the South Portland harbor.
"[ Big Oil] has come out of the shadows. They've really declared an all-out offensive against the citizens of South Portland." -Rob Sellin, Protect South Portland
The moratorium is expected to pass "handily."
Earlier this month, in response to news of the pending moratorium, a letter drafted by a lawyer with the American Petroleum Institute (API) to members of the city council threatened the moratorium "would have strong legal challenges" if passed. It claims the ruling would be an unconstitutional attempt to regulate interstate commerce.
In November, the Waterfront Protection Ordinance (or WPO)--a measure to prevent the use of the South Portland harbor as a potential location for an alternate tar sands pipeline--was defeated by a scant 192 votes after a coalition of oil giants including Citgo, Irving, and the API dumped hundreds of thousands of dollars into a campaign against the legislation.
Ahead of the November vote, the oil industry made repeated claims that the WPO was premature, saying there was "no proposal to reverse the flow of the Portland-Montreal pipeline" to allow for the transport of tar sands oil from Alberta, Canada to overseas markets.
Despite this, on Dec. 6 a Quebec National Assembly committee voted to reverse the flow of Enbridge's Line 9B pipeline from Alberta to Quebec, a move widely seen by many as the first step in transporting tar sands from Alberta to South Portland.
"Even though Portland Pipe Line Corp. says it has no tar-sands plan, tar sands is on its way," said South Portland resident Crystal Goodrich.
"They've really come out of the shadows," added Rob Sellin, co-founder of the group Protect South Portland. "They've really declared an all-out offensive against the citizens of South Portland and our elected officials."
_____________________

On Wednesday evening, members of the South Portland City Council voted unanimously to create a Draft Ordinance Committee with the explicit purpose of creating a new land-use rule to "prevent the flow and processing of unrefined tar sands in South Portland," local media reports.
"It's very pleasing to see all of us this evening take a stand that we do not want tar sands in our community and that we will not let it happen," said Councilor Tom Blake.
Formal votes to make appointments to the committee and establish a working budget won't take place until the council's Jan. 6 meeting. In the meantime, however, the city will vote on Dec. 16 to adopt a moratorium on any construction that would enable the transport of tar sands via the South Portland harbor.
"[ Big Oil] has come out of the shadows. They've really declared an all-out offensive against the citizens of South Portland." -Rob Sellin, Protect South Portland
The moratorium is expected to pass "handily."
Earlier this month, in response to news of the pending moratorium, a letter drafted by a lawyer with the American Petroleum Institute (API) to members of the city council threatened the moratorium "would have strong legal challenges" if passed. It claims the ruling would be an unconstitutional attempt to regulate interstate commerce.
In November, the Waterfront Protection Ordinance (or WPO)--a measure to prevent the use of the South Portland harbor as a potential location for an alternate tar sands pipeline--was defeated by a scant 192 votes after a coalition of oil giants including Citgo, Irving, and the API dumped hundreds of thousands of dollars into a campaign against the legislation.
Ahead of the November vote, the oil industry made repeated claims that the WPO was premature, saying there was "no proposal to reverse the flow of the Portland-Montreal pipeline" to allow for the transport of tar sands oil from Alberta, Canada to overseas markets.
Despite this, on Dec. 6 a Quebec National Assembly committee voted to reverse the flow of Enbridge's Line 9B pipeline from Alberta to Quebec, a move widely seen by many as the first step in transporting tar sands from Alberta to South Portland.
"Even though Portland Pipe Line Corp. says it has no tar-sands plan, tar sands is on its way," said South Portland resident Crystal Goodrich.
"They've really come out of the shadows," added Rob Sellin, co-founder of the group Protect South Portland. "They've really declared an all-out offensive against the citizens of South Portland and our elected officials."
_____________________