SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Emails between the Canadian federal government and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP)--released through provincial freedom of information laws and publicly posted by Greenpeace Canada researcher Keith Stewart--reveal that last spring the oil industry successfully delayed a proposed carbon tax increase of $40 per ton in the province of Alberta by lobbying the Canadian federal government.
"The industry in these documents is clearly saying delay, delay, delay and then do as little as possible," Stewart said Friday in an interview with the Globe and Mail. "And the federal government seems to be taking that as marching orders."
In the exposed emails, CAPP officials vigorously oppose "costly new burdens on the industry and the economy." Numbered among their concerns is that the profit margin of the tar sands industry could be harmed.
They insist the proposed tax will hurt their bottom-line without helping their public image. "The objection to the oil sands is ideological... if the 40/40 guidelines were enacted, oil sands opponents would claim that they too were insufficient."
"Will higher stringency requirements impact production and revenue?" reads the document. "Very likely."
CAPP urges the government to forestall any immediate action, insisting, "more communication, public awareness campaign of current policies, regulations, and environmental issues is required."
The industry's efforts appear to have been successful so far at stalling a carbon tax increase. Large carbon emitters currently pay $15 for every ton of carbon yet are reimbursed large portions of these penalties through provincial tax write-off laws.
Alberta has been slammed for its relatively weak laws and high levels of emissions, thanks in part to its dirty tar sands industry.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Emails between the Canadian federal government and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP)--released through provincial freedom of information laws and publicly posted by Greenpeace Canada researcher Keith Stewart--reveal that last spring the oil industry successfully delayed a proposed carbon tax increase of $40 per ton in the province of Alberta by lobbying the Canadian federal government.
"The industry in these documents is clearly saying delay, delay, delay and then do as little as possible," Stewart said Friday in an interview with the Globe and Mail. "And the federal government seems to be taking that as marching orders."
In the exposed emails, CAPP officials vigorously oppose "costly new burdens on the industry and the economy." Numbered among their concerns is that the profit margin of the tar sands industry could be harmed.
They insist the proposed tax will hurt their bottom-line without helping their public image. "The objection to the oil sands is ideological... if the 40/40 guidelines were enacted, oil sands opponents would claim that they too were insufficient."
"Will higher stringency requirements impact production and revenue?" reads the document. "Very likely."
CAPP urges the government to forestall any immediate action, insisting, "more communication, public awareness campaign of current policies, regulations, and environmental issues is required."
The industry's efforts appear to have been successful so far at stalling a carbon tax increase. Large carbon emitters currently pay $15 for every ton of carbon yet are reimbursed large portions of these penalties through provincial tax write-off laws.
Alberta has been slammed for its relatively weak laws and high levels of emissions, thanks in part to its dirty tar sands industry.
_____________________
Emails between the Canadian federal government and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP)--released through provincial freedom of information laws and publicly posted by Greenpeace Canada researcher Keith Stewart--reveal that last spring the oil industry successfully delayed a proposed carbon tax increase of $40 per ton in the province of Alberta by lobbying the Canadian federal government.
"The industry in these documents is clearly saying delay, delay, delay and then do as little as possible," Stewart said Friday in an interview with the Globe and Mail. "And the federal government seems to be taking that as marching orders."
In the exposed emails, CAPP officials vigorously oppose "costly new burdens on the industry and the economy." Numbered among their concerns is that the profit margin of the tar sands industry could be harmed.
They insist the proposed tax will hurt their bottom-line without helping their public image. "The objection to the oil sands is ideological... if the 40/40 guidelines were enacted, oil sands opponents would claim that they too were insufficient."
"Will higher stringency requirements impact production and revenue?" reads the document. "Very likely."
CAPP urges the government to forestall any immediate action, insisting, "more communication, public awareness campaign of current policies, regulations, and environmental issues is required."
The industry's efforts appear to have been successful so far at stalling a carbon tax increase. Large carbon emitters currently pay $15 for every ton of carbon yet are reimbursed large portions of these penalties through provincial tax write-off laws.
Alberta has been slammed for its relatively weak laws and high levels of emissions, thanks in part to its dirty tar sands industry.
_____________________