

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Emails between the Canadian federal government and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP)--released through provincial freedom of information laws and publicly posted by Greenpeace Canada researcher Keith Stewart--reveal that last spring the oil industry successfully delayed a proposed carbon tax increase of $40 per ton in the province of Alberta by lobbying the Canadian federal government.
"The industry in these documents is clearly saying delay, delay, delay and then do as little as possible," Stewart said Friday in an interview with the Globe and Mail. "And the federal government seems to be taking that as marching orders."
In the exposed emails, CAPP officials vigorously oppose "costly new burdens on the industry and the economy." Numbered among their concerns is that the profit margin of the tar sands industry could be harmed.
They insist the proposed tax will hurt their bottom-line without helping their public image. "The objection to the oil sands is ideological... if the 40/40 guidelines were enacted, oil sands opponents would claim that they too were insufficient."
"Will higher stringency requirements impact production and revenue?" reads the document. "Very likely."
CAPP urges the government to forestall any immediate action, insisting, "more communication, public awareness campaign of current policies, regulations, and environmental issues is required."
The industry's efforts appear to have been successful so far at stalling a carbon tax increase. Large carbon emitters currently pay $15 for every ton of carbon yet are reimbursed large portions of these penalties through provincial tax write-off laws.
Alberta has been slammed for its relatively weak laws and high levels of emissions, thanks in part to its dirty tar sands industry.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

Emails between the Canadian federal government and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP)--released through provincial freedom of information laws and publicly posted by Greenpeace Canada researcher Keith Stewart--reveal that last spring the oil industry successfully delayed a proposed carbon tax increase of $40 per ton in the province of Alberta by lobbying the Canadian federal government.
"The industry in these documents is clearly saying delay, delay, delay and then do as little as possible," Stewart said Friday in an interview with the Globe and Mail. "And the federal government seems to be taking that as marching orders."
In the exposed emails, CAPP officials vigorously oppose "costly new burdens on the industry and the economy." Numbered among their concerns is that the profit margin of the tar sands industry could be harmed.
They insist the proposed tax will hurt their bottom-line without helping their public image. "The objection to the oil sands is ideological... if the 40/40 guidelines were enacted, oil sands opponents would claim that they too were insufficient."
"Will higher stringency requirements impact production and revenue?" reads the document. "Very likely."
CAPP urges the government to forestall any immediate action, insisting, "more communication, public awareness campaign of current policies, regulations, and environmental issues is required."
The industry's efforts appear to have been successful so far at stalling a carbon tax increase. Large carbon emitters currently pay $15 for every ton of carbon yet are reimbursed large portions of these penalties through provincial tax write-off laws.
Alberta has been slammed for its relatively weak laws and high levels of emissions, thanks in part to its dirty tar sands industry.
_____________________

Emails between the Canadian federal government and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP)--released through provincial freedom of information laws and publicly posted by Greenpeace Canada researcher Keith Stewart--reveal that last spring the oil industry successfully delayed a proposed carbon tax increase of $40 per ton in the province of Alberta by lobbying the Canadian federal government.
"The industry in these documents is clearly saying delay, delay, delay and then do as little as possible," Stewart said Friday in an interview with the Globe and Mail. "And the federal government seems to be taking that as marching orders."
In the exposed emails, CAPP officials vigorously oppose "costly new burdens on the industry and the economy." Numbered among their concerns is that the profit margin of the tar sands industry could be harmed.
They insist the proposed tax will hurt their bottom-line without helping their public image. "The objection to the oil sands is ideological... if the 40/40 guidelines were enacted, oil sands opponents would claim that they too were insufficient."
"Will higher stringency requirements impact production and revenue?" reads the document. "Very likely."
CAPP urges the government to forestall any immediate action, insisting, "more communication, public awareness campaign of current policies, regulations, and environmental issues is required."
The industry's efforts appear to have been successful so far at stalling a carbon tax increase. Large carbon emitters currently pay $15 for every ton of carbon yet are reimbursed large portions of these penalties through provincial tax write-off laws.
Alberta has been slammed for its relatively weak laws and high levels of emissions, thanks in part to its dirty tar sands industry.
_____________________