SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
UN Rejects Meeting With First Nations Community Over Trade Agreement
New law could give China immunity from environmental, labor rules protecting First Nations from foreign industry
Oct 15, 2013
Following a Canada-wide tour of First Nations communities by the United Nations rapporteur on indigenous rights this week, the international body has rejected a request from the Hupacasath First Nation to meet over a major trade pact between Canada and China they say will result in the destruction of vast swathes of First Nations land.
According to the Hupacasath, the Canada-China Foreign Investment Protection Agreement (FIPA) would allow Chinese businesses to sue Canadian local or national governments if their laws block them from turning profits in Canada. As the First Nations rights group Idle No More said in an earlier press release, "This includes any environmental protection rules that China's government does not agree with," and would put Canadian employment standards "on the chopping block" within Chinese companies operating in Canada.
China would also be immune to having to pay for clean-up costs associated with an oil spill or other environmental disaster, amongst many other laws protecting Firsts Nations and Canadian people from corporate harm, the group warns.
"The Hupacasath say the FIPA will essentially override indigenous Canadians' aboriginal right to resources on its lands -- the ability to govern the ecosystems on their lands," reports Al Jazeera.
The UN trip brought rapporteur James Anaya around Canada to asses what Idle No More co-founder Sylvia McAdam referred to as the federal government's "unrelenting attacks on indigenous sovereignty and treaties."
However, the Hupacasath say they were snubbed by Anaya, who said he did not have time to meet with them over their grievance.
"I did write an email. I received a letter back saying that his schedule was full," Brenda Sayers, a Hupacasath member heading a campaign to block the FIPA, told Al Jazeera. "Unfortunately, the Hupacasath won't have a chance to chat with him about the overriding issue in Canada. The FIPA will override our rights to say no to major pipelines and logging of our original territory here."
A federal court recently denied the Hupacasath's legal bid to stop the FIPA and ordered them to pay $106,331 of the government's legal fees from the case.
A UN public report on Anaya's findings will be presented to the UN Human Rights Council in September 2014 but will now likely lack an analysis of this case.
_______________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Following a Canada-wide tour of First Nations communities by the United Nations rapporteur on indigenous rights this week, the international body has rejected a request from the Hupacasath First Nation to meet over a major trade pact between Canada and China they say will result in the destruction of vast swathes of First Nations land.
According to the Hupacasath, the Canada-China Foreign Investment Protection Agreement (FIPA) would allow Chinese businesses to sue Canadian local or national governments if their laws block them from turning profits in Canada. As the First Nations rights group Idle No More said in an earlier press release, "This includes any environmental protection rules that China's government does not agree with," and would put Canadian employment standards "on the chopping block" within Chinese companies operating in Canada.
China would also be immune to having to pay for clean-up costs associated with an oil spill or other environmental disaster, amongst many other laws protecting Firsts Nations and Canadian people from corporate harm, the group warns.
"The Hupacasath say the FIPA will essentially override indigenous Canadians' aboriginal right to resources on its lands -- the ability to govern the ecosystems on their lands," reports Al Jazeera.
The UN trip brought rapporteur James Anaya around Canada to asses what Idle No More co-founder Sylvia McAdam referred to as the federal government's "unrelenting attacks on indigenous sovereignty and treaties."
However, the Hupacasath say they were snubbed by Anaya, who said he did not have time to meet with them over their grievance.
"I did write an email. I received a letter back saying that his schedule was full," Brenda Sayers, a Hupacasath member heading a campaign to block the FIPA, told Al Jazeera. "Unfortunately, the Hupacasath won't have a chance to chat with him about the overriding issue in Canada. The FIPA will override our rights to say no to major pipelines and logging of our original territory here."
A federal court recently denied the Hupacasath's legal bid to stop the FIPA and ordered them to pay $106,331 of the government's legal fees from the case.
A UN public report on Anaya's findings will be presented to the UN Human Rights Council in September 2014 but will now likely lack an analysis of this case.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Following a Canada-wide tour of First Nations communities by the United Nations rapporteur on indigenous rights this week, the international body has rejected a request from the Hupacasath First Nation to meet over a major trade pact between Canada and China they say will result in the destruction of vast swathes of First Nations land.
According to the Hupacasath, the Canada-China Foreign Investment Protection Agreement (FIPA) would allow Chinese businesses to sue Canadian local or national governments if their laws block them from turning profits in Canada. As the First Nations rights group Idle No More said in an earlier press release, "This includes any environmental protection rules that China's government does not agree with," and would put Canadian employment standards "on the chopping block" within Chinese companies operating in Canada.
China would also be immune to having to pay for clean-up costs associated with an oil spill or other environmental disaster, amongst many other laws protecting Firsts Nations and Canadian people from corporate harm, the group warns.
"The Hupacasath say the FIPA will essentially override indigenous Canadians' aboriginal right to resources on its lands -- the ability to govern the ecosystems on their lands," reports Al Jazeera.
The UN trip brought rapporteur James Anaya around Canada to asses what Idle No More co-founder Sylvia McAdam referred to as the federal government's "unrelenting attacks on indigenous sovereignty and treaties."
However, the Hupacasath say they were snubbed by Anaya, who said he did not have time to meet with them over their grievance.
"I did write an email. I received a letter back saying that his schedule was full," Brenda Sayers, a Hupacasath member heading a campaign to block the FIPA, told Al Jazeera. "Unfortunately, the Hupacasath won't have a chance to chat with him about the overriding issue in Canada. The FIPA will override our rights to say no to major pipelines and logging of our original territory here."
A federal court recently denied the Hupacasath's legal bid to stop the FIPA and ordered them to pay $106,331 of the government's legal fees from the case.
A UN public report on Anaya's findings will be presented to the UN Human Rights Council in September 2014 but will now likely lack an analysis of this case.
_______________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy