Study: Counter-Terrorism Laws Cripple Humanitarian Aid Networks
Case studies of Somalia and Palestine reveal cuts in donations, barriers to programming, and climates of fear
Global counter-terrorism laws are hampering vital humanitarian aid work by cutting off funding, halting projects, and creating climates of fear and "self-limitation," a new independent study finds.

Published last week, and reported by the Guardian Tuesday, the report was commissioned by the UN for the Norwegian Refugee Council and Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and examines the impact of laws like the 2011 US Patriot Act, focusing on their effect on Somalia and Palestine as case studies reflecting global trends.
Sanctions and counter-terrorism measures targeting Al-Shebab in Somalia led to a severe drop in aid to that country, in part because of the intimidation of organizations who believed their reputations to be vulnerable, especially Islamic aid organizations, the study shows.
After Al-Shebab was listed as a terrorist organization in 2008, aid to Somalia tanked 88 percent, and counter-terrorism measures worsened "an already polarized environment in which humanitarian actors are not perceived as neutral, impartial or independent," the report finds, noting that the structural impacts of these developments will "stretch into the future."
Approximately 3.6 million people in Somalia depend on aid for their survival, IRIN Africa reports.
In Gaza, "the parameters of humanitarian action have, for the most part, been shifted so that programs are designated firstly to avoid contact with or support to the designated group (Hamas), and only secondly to respond to humanitarian needs," states the report. As a result, humanitarian aid work and funding in Gaza are decreasing, with many NGOs afraid to accept donations.
In one case, food could not be delivered to thousands of families because the donor did not wish to share the list of beneficiaries with the ministry of social affairs.
80 percent of the 1.6 million people living in Gaza depend on humanitarian aid, according to Oxfam International.
Aid groups have long-complained about the paralyzing effects of counter-terrorism laws on vital relief work as the so-called Global War on Terror drags into its 13th year.
Jehangir Malik of Islamic Relief declared at a 2010 meeting about the issue: "At times I feel that we are so crippled that we should really be honest with our donors, and say, you know, pull out altogether and return everybody's money to the respective donors."
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Global counter-terrorism laws are hampering vital humanitarian aid work by cutting off funding, halting projects, and creating climates of fear and "self-limitation," a new independent study finds.

Published last week, and reported by the Guardian Tuesday, the report was commissioned by the UN for the Norwegian Refugee Council and Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and examines the impact of laws like the 2011 US Patriot Act, focusing on their effect on Somalia and Palestine as case studies reflecting global trends.
Sanctions and counter-terrorism measures targeting Al-Shebab in Somalia led to a severe drop in aid to that country, in part because of the intimidation of organizations who believed their reputations to be vulnerable, especially Islamic aid organizations, the study shows.
After Al-Shebab was listed as a terrorist organization in 2008, aid to Somalia tanked 88 percent, and counter-terrorism measures worsened "an already polarized environment in which humanitarian actors are not perceived as neutral, impartial or independent," the report finds, noting that the structural impacts of these developments will "stretch into the future."
Approximately 3.6 million people in Somalia depend on aid for their survival, IRIN Africa reports.
In Gaza, "the parameters of humanitarian action have, for the most part, been shifted so that programs are designated firstly to avoid contact with or support to the designated group (Hamas), and only secondly to respond to humanitarian needs," states the report. As a result, humanitarian aid work and funding in Gaza are decreasing, with many NGOs afraid to accept donations.
In one case, food could not be delivered to thousands of families because the donor did not wish to share the list of beneficiaries with the ministry of social affairs.
80 percent of the 1.6 million people living in Gaza depend on humanitarian aid, according to Oxfam International.
Aid groups have long-complained about the paralyzing effects of counter-terrorism laws on vital relief work as the so-called Global War on Terror drags into its 13th year.
Jehangir Malik of Islamic Relief declared at a 2010 meeting about the issue: "At times I feel that we are so crippled that we should really be honest with our donors, and say, you know, pull out altogether and return everybody's money to the respective donors."
_____________________
Global counter-terrorism laws are hampering vital humanitarian aid work by cutting off funding, halting projects, and creating climates of fear and "self-limitation," a new independent study finds.

Published last week, and reported by the Guardian Tuesday, the report was commissioned by the UN for the Norwegian Refugee Council and Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and examines the impact of laws like the 2011 US Patriot Act, focusing on their effect on Somalia and Palestine as case studies reflecting global trends.
Sanctions and counter-terrorism measures targeting Al-Shebab in Somalia led to a severe drop in aid to that country, in part because of the intimidation of organizations who believed their reputations to be vulnerable, especially Islamic aid organizations, the study shows.
After Al-Shebab was listed as a terrorist organization in 2008, aid to Somalia tanked 88 percent, and counter-terrorism measures worsened "an already polarized environment in which humanitarian actors are not perceived as neutral, impartial or independent," the report finds, noting that the structural impacts of these developments will "stretch into the future."
Approximately 3.6 million people in Somalia depend on aid for their survival, IRIN Africa reports.
In Gaza, "the parameters of humanitarian action have, for the most part, been shifted so that programs are designated firstly to avoid contact with or support to the designated group (Hamas), and only secondly to respond to humanitarian needs," states the report. As a result, humanitarian aid work and funding in Gaza are decreasing, with many NGOs afraid to accept donations.
In one case, food could not be delivered to thousands of families because the donor did not wish to share the list of beneficiaries with the ministry of social affairs.
80 percent of the 1.6 million people living in Gaza depend on humanitarian aid, according to Oxfam International.
Aid groups have long-complained about the paralyzing effects of counter-terrorism laws on vital relief work as the so-called Global War on Terror drags into its 13th year.
Jehangir Malik of Islamic Relief declared at a 2010 meeting about the issue: "At times I feel that we are so crippled that we should really be honest with our donors, and say, you know, pull out altogether and return everybody's money to the respective donors."
_____________________

