SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A tractor cuts down drought stricken corn, Tuesday, July 31, 2012. (Bloomberg/Getty Images)
'Things Could Get Ugly': Fracking Set to Escalate US Water Wars
Nearly half of fracking happens in places short on water
May 03, 2013
A new study released Thursday shows that a "significant portion" of fracking, a water intensive process, is happening in already water-stressed regions of the United States--most prominently Texas and Colorado, "which are both in the midst of prolonged drought conditions."
As Grist reports Friday, fracking will likely escalate "the West's water wars" as farmers and homeowners now have to contend with drillers in already drought-stricken regions.
Grist reports:
A new report from nonprofit Ceres (which maintains a neutral position on fracking in general) reveals that nearly half of the country's fracking wells are located in water-stressed regions -- in particular Texas and Colorado, where 92 percent of fracking wells are in extremely high-water-stress regions. Ceres compiled its report using data from the World Resources Institute -- which considers an area extremely water-stressed if 80 percent of its available water supply is already allocated for municipal, industrial, and agricultural uses -- and FracFocus.org, a voluntary national registry of fracking wells' locations and water usage.
FracFocus shows that between January 2011 and September 2012, the 25,450 wells in its database used 65.8 billion gallons of water, or the amount of water 2.5 million Americans use in a year. Because the site doesn't have data for every single well in the country, fracking's total water impact is likely even higher.
"These findings highlight emerging tensions in many U.S. regions between growing hydraulic fracturing activity and localized water supply needs," said Ceres president Mindy Lubber.
Monika Freyman, the report's author, told the New York Times, "You have to look at a county-by-county scale to capture the intense and short-term impact on water supplies."
"The whole drilling and fracking process is a well-orchestrated, moment-by-moment process" in which one million to five million gallons of water are needed for short periods, she said. "They [frackers] need an intense amount of water for a few days, and that's it."
The "neutral" Ceres report does not go far enough to suggest a moratorium on fracking.
However, the implications are clear enough--as the essential yet finite resource, water, continues to dwindle, frackers continue to use up excessive amounts of water to extract fossil fuels, all the while polluting large amounts of groundwater with toxic chemicals, which infect drinking wells along with swathes of land, farms, and personal property in surrounding territories.
"As summer approaches, huge areas of the Western U.S. still haven't recovered from last year's devastating drought," Claire Thompson reports at Grist. "Things could get ugly."
_______________________
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
A new study released Thursday shows that a "significant portion" of fracking, a water intensive process, is happening in already water-stressed regions of the United States--most prominently Texas and Colorado, "which are both in the midst of prolonged drought conditions."
As Grist reports Friday, fracking will likely escalate "the West's water wars" as farmers and homeowners now have to contend with drillers in already drought-stricken regions.
Grist reports:
A new report from nonprofit Ceres (which maintains a neutral position on fracking in general) reveals that nearly half of the country's fracking wells are located in water-stressed regions -- in particular Texas and Colorado, where 92 percent of fracking wells are in extremely high-water-stress regions. Ceres compiled its report using data from the World Resources Institute -- which considers an area extremely water-stressed if 80 percent of its available water supply is already allocated for municipal, industrial, and agricultural uses -- and FracFocus.org, a voluntary national registry of fracking wells' locations and water usage.
FracFocus shows that between January 2011 and September 2012, the 25,450 wells in its database used 65.8 billion gallons of water, or the amount of water 2.5 million Americans use in a year. Because the site doesn't have data for every single well in the country, fracking's total water impact is likely even higher.
"These findings highlight emerging tensions in many U.S. regions between growing hydraulic fracturing activity and localized water supply needs," said Ceres president Mindy Lubber.
Monika Freyman, the report's author, told the New York Times, "You have to look at a county-by-county scale to capture the intense and short-term impact on water supplies."
"The whole drilling and fracking process is a well-orchestrated, moment-by-moment process" in which one million to five million gallons of water are needed for short periods, she said. "They [frackers] need an intense amount of water for a few days, and that's it."
The "neutral" Ceres report does not go far enough to suggest a moratorium on fracking.
However, the implications are clear enough--as the essential yet finite resource, water, continues to dwindle, frackers continue to use up excessive amounts of water to extract fossil fuels, all the while polluting large amounts of groundwater with toxic chemicals, which infect drinking wells along with swathes of land, farms, and personal property in surrounding territories.
"As summer approaches, huge areas of the Western U.S. still haven't recovered from last year's devastating drought," Claire Thompson reports at Grist. "Things could get ugly."
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
A new study released Thursday shows that a "significant portion" of fracking, a water intensive process, is happening in already water-stressed regions of the United States--most prominently Texas and Colorado, "which are both in the midst of prolonged drought conditions."
As Grist reports Friday, fracking will likely escalate "the West's water wars" as farmers and homeowners now have to contend with drillers in already drought-stricken regions.
Grist reports:
A new report from nonprofit Ceres (which maintains a neutral position on fracking in general) reveals that nearly half of the country's fracking wells are located in water-stressed regions -- in particular Texas and Colorado, where 92 percent of fracking wells are in extremely high-water-stress regions. Ceres compiled its report using data from the World Resources Institute -- which considers an area extremely water-stressed if 80 percent of its available water supply is already allocated for municipal, industrial, and agricultural uses -- and FracFocus.org, a voluntary national registry of fracking wells' locations and water usage.
FracFocus shows that between January 2011 and September 2012, the 25,450 wells in its database used 65.8 billion gallons of water, or the amount of water 2.5 million Americans use in a year. Because the site doesn't have data for every single well in the country, fracking's total water impact is likely even higher.
"These findings highlight emerging tensions in many U.S. regions between growing hydraulic fracturing activity and localized water supply needs," said Ceres president Mindy Lubber.
Monika Freyman, the report's author, told the New York Times, "You have to look at a county-by-county scale to capture the intense and short-term impact on water supplies."
"The whole drilling and fracking process is a well-orchestrated, moment-by-moment process" in which one million to five million gallons of water are needed for short periods, she said. "They [frackers] need an intense amount of water for a few days, and that's it."
The "neutral" Ceres report does not go far enough to suggest a moratorium on fracking.
However, the implications are clear enough--as the essential yet finite resource, water, continues to dwindle, frackers continue to use up excessive amounts of water to extract fossil fuels, all the while polluting large amounts of groundwater with toxic chemicals, which infect drinking wells along with swathes of land, farms, and personal property in surrounding territories.
"As summer approaches, huge areas of the Western U.S. still haven't recovered from last year's devastating drought," Claire Thompson reports at Grist. "Things could get ugly."
_______________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.