SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
If the US government has their way, federal protections for gray wolves could be dropped within the year. (Photo: mikec_905/ Flickr)
US Plans to Drop Protections for Gray Wolves in Lower 48
Wildlife Group: 'This is politics versus professional wildlife management'
Apr 28, 2013
Federal authorities are preparing legislation to remove endangered species protections for gray wolves in the Lower 48 states.
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service draft legislation obtained by The Los Angeles Times, control of wolves would be transferred to state wildlife agencies.
Responding to the news, scientists and conservation groups said that the rule "reeks of politics," as ranching and agricultural industries have lobbied heavily for the delistment of the species.
"This is politics versus professional wildlife management," said Jamie Rappaport Clark, president of Defenders of Wildlife. "The service is saying, 'We're done. Game over. Whatever happens to wolves in the U.S. is a state thing.' They are declaring victory long before science would tell them to do so."
"There's a race to the bottom to see who can be more anti-wolf," added Don Barry, vice president at Defenders of Wildlife and former Interior Department assistant secretary. "They're basically giving up on wolf recovery before the job is done."
The law carves out an exception for a small population of Mexican wolves in the Southwest which, as a distinct subspecies of the gray wolf, would continue to receive federal protections.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service said Friday the rule was under review and would be published in the Federal Register and opened to public comment before a final decision is made.
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Federal authorities are preparing legislation to remove endangered species protections for gray wolves in the Lower 48 states.
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service draft legislation obtained by The Los Angeles Times, control of wolves would be transferred to state wildlife agencies.
Responding to the news, scientists and conservation groups said that the rule "reeks of politics," as ranching and agricultural industries have lobbied heavily for the delistment of the species.
"This is politics versus professional wildlife management," said Jamie Rappaport Clark, president of Defenders of Wildlife. "The service is saying, 'We're done. Game over. Whatever happens to wolves in the U.S. is a state thing.' They are declaring victory long before science would tell them to do so."
"There's a race to the bottom to see who can be more anti-wolf," added Don Barry, vice president at Defenders of Wildlife and former Interior Department assistant secretary. "They're basically giving up on wolf recovery before the job is done."
The law carves out an exception for a small population of Mexican wolves in the Southwest which, as a distinct subspecies of the gray wolf, would continue to receive federal protections.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service said Friday the rule was under review and would be published in the Federal Register and opened to public comment before a final decision is made.
_____________________
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
Federal authorities are preparing legislation to remove endangered species protections for gray wolves in the Lower 48 states.
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service draft legislation obtained by The Los Angeles Times, control of wolves would be transferred to state wildlife agencies.
Responding to the news, scientists and conservation groups said that the rule "reeks of politics," as ranching and agricultural industries have lobbied heavily for the delistment of the species.
"This is politics versus professional wildlife management," said Jamie Rappaport Clark, president of Defenders of Wildlife. "The service is saying, 'We're done. Game over. Whatever happens to wolves in the U.S. is a state thing.' They are declaring victory long before science would tell them to do so."
"There's a race to the bottom to see who can be more anti-wolf," added Don Barry, vice president at Defenders of Wildlife and former Interior Department assistant secretary. "They're basically giving up on wolf recovery before the job is done."
The law carves out an exception for a small population of Mexican wolves in the Southwest which, as a distinct subspecies of the gray wolf, would continue to receive federal protections.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service said Friday the rule was under review and would be published in the Federal Register and opened to public comment before a final decision is made.
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.