

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Federal authorities are preparing legislation to remove endangered species protections for gray wolves in the Lower 48 states.
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service draft legislation obtained by The Los Angeles Times, control of wolves would be transferred to state wildlife agencies.
Responding to the news, scientists and conservation groups said that the rule "reeks of politics," as ranching and agricultural industries have lobbied heavily for the delistment of the species.
"This is politics versus professional wildlife management," said Jamie Rappaport Clark, president of Defenders of Wildlife. "The service is saying, 'We're done. Game over. Whatever happens to wolves in the U.S. is a state thing.' They are declaring victory long before science would tell them to do so."
"There's a race to the bottom to see who can be more anti-wolf," added Don Barry, vice president at Defenders of Wildlife and former Interior Department assistant secretary. "They're basically giving up on wolf recovery before the job is done."
The law carves out an exception for a small population of Mexican wolves in the Southwest which, as a distinct subspecies of the gray wolf, would continue to receive federal protections.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service said Friday the rule was under review and would be published in the Federal Register and opened to public comment before a final decision is made.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Federal authorities are preparing legislation to remove endangered species protections for gray wolves in the Lower 48 states.
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service draft legislation obtained by The Los Angeles Times, control of wolves would be transferred to state wildlife agencies.
Responding to the news, scientists and conservation groups said that the rule "reeks of politics," as ranching and agricultural industries have lobbied heavily for the delistment of the species.
"This is politics versus professional wildlife management," said Jamie Rappaport Clark, president of Defenders of Wildlife. "The service is saying, 'We're done. Game over. Whatever happens to wolves in the U.S. is a state thing.' They are declaring victory long before science would tell them to do so."
"There's a race to the bottom to see who can be more anti-wolf," added Don Barry, vice president at Defenders of Wildlife and former Interior Department assistant secretary. "They're basically giving up on wolf recovery before the job is done."
The law carves out an exception for a small population of Mexican wolves in the Southwest which, as a distinct subspecies of the gray wolf, would continue to receive federal protections.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service said Friday the rule was under review and would be published in the Federal Register and opened to public comment before a final decision is made.
_____________________
Federal authorities are preparing legislation to remove endangered species protections for gray wolves in the Lower 48 states.
According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service draft legislation obtained by The Los Angeles Times, control of wolves would be transferred to state wildlife agencies.
Responding to the news, scientists and conservation groups said that the rule "reeks of politics," as ranching and agricultural industries have lobbied heavily for the delistment of the species.
"This is politics versus professional wildlife management," said Jamie Rappaport Clark, president of Defenders of Wildlife. "The service is saying, 'We're done. Game over. Whatever happens to wolves in the U.S. is a state thing.' They are declaring victory long before science would tell them to do so."
"There's a race to the bottom to see who can be more anti-wolf," added Don Barry, vice president at Defenders of Wildlife and former Interior Department assistant secretary. "They're basically giving up on wolf recovery before the job is done."
The law carves out an exception for a small population of Mexican wolves in the Southwest which, as a distinct subspecies of the gray wolf, would continue to receive federal protections.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service said Friday the rule was under review and would be published in the Federal Register and opened to public comment before a final decision is made.
_____________________