Blow for BigPharma, Win for the People in Patent Ruling
India's Intellectual Property Appellate Board allows license for generic cancer drug at fraction of cost of Bayer's
Pharmaceutical giant Bayer has been dealt a blow with a precedent-setting ruling that allows the production of a low-cost version of its patented cancer drug Nexavar in India, vastly expanding access to the drug and challenging the global pharmaceutical monopolies that put potentially life-saving drugs out of reach for many.
On Monday, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) upheld a compulsory license given by India last year to Hyderabad-based Natco Pharma for its generic version of Nexavar, used in the treatment of kidney and liver cancer, dismissing a plea from Bayer to overturn that license.
As Reuters explains,
Under a global Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement, countries can issue compulsory licenses on certain drugs that are deemed unaffordable to a large section of their populations.
Natco Pharma's version costs roughly 97% less than Bayer's Nexavar.
The ruling, the first in which the IPAB said the use of a compulsory license was legal, also stated that Natco would have to pay Bayer 7% in royalties for the drug.
In an interview with The Economic Times, Finance Director of Natco Pharma Bhaskar Narayana stated the importance of the landmark ruling.
"This only means that the IPAB has reaffirmed the crucial concept of making life-saving medicines available and affordable to the suffering masses. Therefore, it is big news not only for Natco Pharma, but also for the millions of cancer patients who cannot afford high value drugs," stated Narayana.
Health groups cheered the decision as well.
"The decision means that the way has been paved for compulsory licenses to be issued on other drugs, now patented in India and priced out of affordable reach, to be produced by generic companies and sold at a fraction of the price," BBC News quoted Leena Menghaney of the medical charity Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) as saying.
While representing a victory for people, the Connecticut Law Tribune points out how the ruling may leave big pharmaceutical firms shaking:
This is exactly what multinational pharmaceutical companies fear. While this is the first case of a compulsory license in India, drug makers are worried about their patents in India for other reasons. The country has already revoked some patents granted to Pfizer, Roche Holding AG, and Merck & Co., for example. And it rejected Swiss drug maker Novartis's patent application for the leukemia drug Glivec. Novartis appealed that ruling, and has been awaiting a ruling from the Indian Supreme Court. That ruling could come soon.
_______________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Pharmaceutical giant Bayer has been dealt a blow with a precedent-setting ruling that allows the production of a low-cost version of its patented cancer drug Nexavar in India, vastly expanding access to the drug and challenging the global pharmaceutical monopolies that put potentially life-saving drugs out of reach for many.
On Monday, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) upheld a compulsory license given by India last year to Hyderabad-based Natco Pharma for its generic version of Nexavar, used in the treatment of kidney and liver cancer, dismissing a plea from Bayer to overturn that license.
As Reuters explains,
Under a global Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement, countries can issue compulsory licenses on certain drugs that are deemed unaffordable to a large section of their populations.
Natco Pharma's version costs roughly 97% less than Bayer's Nexavar.
The ruling, the first in which the IPAB said the use of a compulsory license was legal, also stated that Natco would have to pay Bayer 7% in royalties for the drug.
In an interview with The Economic Times, Finance Director of Natco Pharma Bhaskar Narayana stated the importance of the landmark ruling.
"This only means that the IPAB has reaffirmed the crucial concept of making life-saving medicines available and affordable to the suffering masses. Therefore, it is big news not only for Natco Pharma, but also for the millions of cancer patients who cannot afford high value drugs," stated Narayana.
Health groups cheered the decision as well.
"The decision means that the way has been paved for compulsory licenses to be issued on other drugs, now patented in India and priced out of affordable reach, to be produced by generic companies and sold at a fraction of the price," BBC News quoted Leena Menghaney of the medical charity Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) as saying.
While representing a victory for people, the Connecticut Law Tribune points out how the ruling may leave big pharmaceutical firms shaking:
This is exactly what multinational pharmaceutical companies fear. While this is the first case of a compulsory license in India, drug makers are worried about their patents in India for other reasons. The country has already revoked some patents granted to Pfizer, Roche Holding AG, and Merck & Co., for example. And it rejected Swiss drug maker Novartis's patent application for the leukemia drug Glivec. Novartis appealed that ruling, and has been awaiting a ruling from the Indian Supreme Court. That ruling could come soon.
_______________________________
Pharmaceutical giant Bayer has been dealt a blow with a precedent-setting ruling that allows the production of a low-cost version of its patented cancer drug Nexavar in India, vastly expanding access to the drug and challenging the global pharmaceutical monopolies that put potentially life-saving drugs out of reach for many.
On Monday, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) upheld a compulsory license given by India last year to Hyderabad-based Natco Pharma for its generic version of Nexavar, used in the treatment of kidney and liver cancer, dismissing a plea from Bayer to overturn that license.
As Reuters explains,
Under a global Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement, countries can issue compulsory licenses on certain drugs that are deemed unaffordable to a large section of their populations.
Natco Pharma's version costs roughly 97% less than Bayer's Nexavar.
The ruling, the first in which the IPAB said the use of a compulsory license was legal, also stated that Natco would have to pay Bayer 7% in royalties for the drug.
In an interview with The Economic Times, Finance Director of Natco Pharma Bhaskar Narayana stated the importance of the landmark ruling.
"This only means that the IPAB has reaffirmed the crucial concept of making life-saving medicines available and affordable to the suffering masses. Therefore, it is big news not only for Natco Pharma, but also for the millions of cancer patients who cannot afford high value drugs," stated Narayana.
Health groups cheered the decision as well.
"The decision means that the way has been paved for compulsory licenses to be issued on other drugs, now patented in India and priced out of affordable reach, to be produced by generic companies and sold at a fraction of the price," BBC News quoted Leena Menghaney of the medical charity Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) as saying.
While representing a victory for people, the Connecticut Law Tribune points out how the ruling may leave big pharmaceutical firms shaking:
This is exactly what multinational pharmaceutical companies fear. While this is the first case of a compulsory license in India, drug makers are worried about their patents in India for other reasons. The country has already revoked some patents granted to Pfizer, Roche Holding AG, and Merck & Co., for example. And it rejected Swiss drug maker Novartis's patent application for the leukemia drug Glivec. Novartis appealed that ruling, and has been awaiting a ruling from the Indian Supreme Court. That ruling could come soon.
_______________________________