White House counterterrorism advisor John Brennan (R) listens as U.S. President Barack Obama nominates him to become the next CIA director at the White House in Washington January 7, 2013. (Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)
Jan 30, 2013
As John Brennan readies for confirmation hearings as CIA director, re-surfaced episodes of how the spy operative and national security adviser dealt with knowledge about the torture program under the Bush administration shows that his reticence about painful coercive techniques employed by the CIA on suspected terrorists was less about the unlawful acts themselves, but about who would get the blame if and when word about them slipped out.
As Reuters reports Wednesday, citing unnamed officials with knowledge of those years, Brennan showed concern "that if details of the program became public, it would be CIA officers who would face criticism, rather than the politicians and lawyers who approved them."
Other officials, according to Reuters, say that Brennan possessed personal concerns about "many elements of the program" but only "voiced those concerns privately" inside the agency. There was no indication that he did anything to stop the mistreatment of those being held in CIA detention facilities, black sites, or elsewhere.
Obama's nomination of John Brennan to head the CIA makes it the second time his name has been floated for the position by the president. Brennan withdrew his name from consideration in early 2009 after groups called attention to the role he may have played in the torture and renditions program under Bush.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As John Brennan readies for confirmation hearings as CIA director, re-surfaced episodes of how the spy operative and national security adviser dealt with knowledge about the torture program under the Bush administration shows that his reticence about painful coercive techniques employed by the CIA on suspected terrorists was less about the unlawful acts themselves, but about who would get the blame if and when word about them slipped out.
As Reuters reports Wednesday, citing unnamed officials with knowledge of those years, Brennan showed concern "that if details of the program became public, it would be CIA officers who would face criticism, rather than the politicians and lawyers who approved them."
Other officials, according to Reuters, say that Brennan possessed personal concerns about "many elements of the program" but only "voiced those concerns privately" inside the agency. There was no indication that he did anything to stop the mistreatment of those being held in CIA detention facilities, black sites, or elsewhere.
Obama's nomination of John Brennan to head the CIA makes it the second time his name has been floated for the position by the president. Brennan withdrew his name from consideration in early 2009 after groups called attention to the role he may have played in the torture and renditions program under Bush.
As John Brennan readies for confirmation hearings as CIA director, re-surfaced episodes of how the spy operative and national security adviser dealt with knowledge about the torture program under the Bush administration shows that his reticence about painful coercive techniques employed by the CIA on suspected terrorists was less about the unlawful acts themselves, but about who would get the blame if and when word about them slipped out.
As Reuters reports Wednesday, citing unnamed officials with knowledge of those years, Brennan showed concern "that if details of the program became public, it would be CIA officers who would face criticism, rather than the politicians and lawyers who approved them."
Other officials, according to Reuters, say that Brennan possessed personal concerns about "many elements of the program" but only "voiced those concerns privately" inside the agency. There was no indication that he did anything to stop the mistreatment of those being held in CIA detention facilities, black sites, or elsewhere.
Obama's nomination of John Brennan to head the CIA makes it the second time his name has been floated for the position by the president. Brennan withdrew his name from consideration in early 2009 after groups called attention to the role he may have played in the torture and renditions program under Bush.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.