SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'An Accident Waiting to Happen': As Rail Increasingly Transports Crude, Opponents Sound Environmental Alarm
Rails see 'game-changing opportunity for their business'
Jan 03, 2013
As oil production in the Bakken area of North Dakota and Montana skyrockets, rail companies are capitalizing on pipeline gaps and reaping profits by transporting the crude while environmental watchdogs call the practice "an accident waiting to happen."
Reuters reports that "it's a booming business for North America's railroads, and should remain an important niche market for years to come."
"BNSF has been hauling Bakken crude out of the Williston Basin area for over five years. In that time, we have seen the volume increase nearly 7,000 percent, from 1.3 million barrels in 2008 to 88.9 million in 2012," Dave Garin, BNSF group vice president, Industrial Products, stated in September. "We see this trend continuing and we are committed to serving this growing market now and in the future."
Union Pacific Corp. chief executive Jack Koraleski also sees the continuing oil boom as profit boom for his industry. "We think we're going to continue to grow the oil business. The rate of growth will slow from its current over-excited pace, but we still think it will continue to be a good business for us," he told Reuters.
And Jeffery Elliot, a rail expert with the New York-based consulting firm Oliver Wyman, told the Associated Press, "The railroads are looking at this as a unique opportunity, a game-changing opportunity for their business."
While rail executives see dollar signs by hauling the oil, critics warn the risk of disaster is high.
"This is all occurring very rapidly, and history teaches that when those things happen, unfortunately, the next thing that is going to occur would be some sort of disaster," Jim Hall, a transportation consultant and former chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, told AP.
AP adds that the Association of American Railroads even acknowledged that the likelihood of a rail accident could be double or triple that of a pipeline problem.
"It's an accident waiting to happen. It's going to be a mess and we don't know where that mess is going to be," Wayde Schafer, a North Dakota spokesman for the Sierra Club told AP, and described using rails over pipelines as "the greater of two evils."
As environmentalists concerned over spills continue to thwart pipeline progress and advocate for clean energy, the new stage of direct actions may be on the nation's rails.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As oil production in the Bakken area of North Dakota and Montana skyrockets, rail companies are capitalizing on pipeline gaps and reaping profits by transporting the crude while environmental watchdogs call the practice "an accident waiting to happen."
Reuters reports that "it's a booming business for North America's railroads, and should remain an important niche market for years to come."
"BNSF has been hauling Bakken crude out of the Williston Basin area for over five years. In that time, we have seen the volume increase nearly 7,000 percent, from 1.3 million barrels in 2008 to 88.9 million in 2012," Dave Garin, BNSF group vice president, Industrial Products, stated in September. "We see this trend continuing and we are committed to serving this growing market now and in the future."
Union Pacific Corp. chief executive Jack Koraleski also sees the continuing oil boom as profit boom for his industry. "We think we're going to continue to grow the oil business. The rate of growth will slow from its current over-excited pace, but we still think it will continue to be a good business for us," he told Reuters.
And Jeffery Elliot, a rail expert with the New York-based consulting firm Oliver Wyman, told the Associated Press, "The railroads are looking at this as a unique opportunity, a game-changing opportunity for their business."
While rail executives see dollar signs by hauling the oil, critics warn the risk of disaster is high.
"This is all occurring very rapidly, and history teaches that when those things happen, unfortunately, the next thing that is going to occur would be some sort of disaster," Jim Hall, a transportation consultant and former chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, told AP.
AP adds that the Association of American Railroads even acknowledged that the likelihood of a rail accident could be double or triple that of a pipeline problem.
"It's an accident waiting to happen. It's going to be a mess and we don't know where that mess is going to be," Wayde Schafer, a North Dakota spokesman for the Sierra Club told AP, and described using rails over pipelines as "the greater of two evils."
As environmentalists concerned over spills continue to thwart pipeline progress and advocate for clean energy, the new stage of direct actions may be on the nation's rails.
As oil production in the Bakken area of North Dakota and Montana skyrockets, rail companies are capitalizing on pipeline gaps and reaping profits by transporting the crude while environmental watchdogs call the practice "an accident waiting to happen."
Reuters reports that "it's a booming business for North America's railroads, and should remain an important niche market for years to come."
"BNSF has been hauling Bakken crude out of the Williston Basin area for over five years. In that time, we have seen the volume increase nearly 7,000 percent, from 1.3 million barrels in 2008 to 88.9 million in 2012," Dave Garin, BNSF group vice president, Industrial Products, stated in September. "We see this trend continuing and we are committed to serving this growing market now and in the future."
Union Pacific Corp. chief executive Jack Koraleski also sees the continuing oil boom as profit boom for his industry. "We think we're going to continue to grow the oil business. The rate of growth will slow from its current over-excited pace, but we still think it will continue to be a good business for us," he told Reuters.
And Jeffery Elliot, a rail expert with the New York-based consulting firm Oliver Wyman, told the Associated Press, "The railroads are looking at this as a unique opportunity, a game-changing opportunity for their business."
While rail executives see dollar signs by hauling the oil, critics warn the risk of disaster is high.
"This is all occurring very rapidly, and history teaches that when those things happen, unfortunately, the next thing that is going to occur would be some sort of disaster," Jim Hall, a transportation consultant and former chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, told AP.
AP adds that the Association of American Railroads even acknowledged that the likelihood of a rail accident could be double or triple that of a pipeline problem.
"It's an accident waiting to happen. It's going to be a mess and we don't know where that mess is going to be," Wayde Schafer, a North Dakota spokesman for the Sierra Club told AP, and described using rails over pipelines as "the greater of two evils."
As environmentalists concerned over spills continue to thwart pipeline progress and advocate for clean energy, the new stage of direct actions may be on the nation's rails.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy