

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Is your pension funding African land grabs? Or plantations of genetically modified crops? A new report on the shadowy and highly unregulated world of agricultural investment published Tuesday by the Oakland Institute focuses on the funds, endowments and private investment firms behind the practice.
"Betting on World Agriculture" (pdf) looks specifically at the investment vehicles that are capitalizing on the growing food crisis by buying up private land and farm assets, "to resell them at a superior market return after an agreed period of time and/or to generate cash from rents." Reporting on their practices, the report states:
For the most part, [the funds'] projections emphasize growing populations, growing demands for grains or fuel, or changing economic cycles and the need for wealthy investors to reap the benefits of declining resources. Their investment thesis relies on securing and consolidating already productive and well-watered pieces of land at the lowest cost possible, and making a profit from land appreciation and most likely land transformation/conversion. Once these lands are secured through ownership transfers, longterm leases, or local partnerships, fund managers seek to scale agricultural operations up by leveraging agricultural inputs (e.g. genetically engineered seeds, fertilizers, agricultural chemicals, machinery) and water resources. The end objective is almost always to primarily serve global markets, and not domestic ones.
The Oakland Institute estimates that the private financial sector has already invested between $10 to $25 billion in farmland and agriculture in recent years, adding that "given current investment trends, this amount might double or triple in the coming years."
The report repeatedly emphasizes that actual "information regarding agricultural and land investments is highly inaccessible, densely layered, and hidden from the public." Operating through "onshore and offshore partnerships," the base of operations for these funds are "typically located in the tax havens of Delaware and the Caribbean Islands."
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy"
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy or indicators raises concerns regarding their actual practices," the report says.
In addition to more traditional investment vehicles, researchers also investigated "grabs" funded by agribusiness companies with their own private investment structures. Mother Jones reports:
Some of the funds explicitly promote growing genetically modified crops. In at least a few cases, the report finds, the funds partner with food and agriculture giants like Monsanto, Cargill, and DuPont, and not exactly by coincidence. Among the investment fund managers listed in the report are former executives and traders at Monsanto and Cargill. Cargill has two of its own private investment firms.
Confirming their "notoriously opaque" reputation, of the 23 companies profiled--which includes big names like UBS, Soros Fund Management, Global Environment Fund, Prudential, TIAA-CREF and Harvard University's endowment--only five responded to the Institute's request for interviews. The report is based on those conversations as well as a review of company websites, media reports, research papers, and government documents.
Some of the other findings include:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Is your pension funding African land grabs? Or plantations of genetically modified crops? A new report on the shadowy and highly unregulated world of agricultural investment published Tuesday by the Oakland Institute focuses on the funds, endowments and private investment firms behind the practice.
"Betting on World Agriculture" (pdf) looks specifically at the investment vehicles that are capitalizing on the growing food crisis by buying up private land and farm assets, "to resell them at a superior market return after an agreed period of time and/or to generate cash from rents." Reporting on their practices, the report states:
For the most part, [the funds'] projections emphasize growing populations, growing demands for grains or fuel, or changing economic cycles and the need for wealthy investors to reap the benefits of declining resources. Their investment thesis relies on securing and consolidating already productive and well-watered pieces of land at the lowest cost possible, and making a profit from land appreciation and most likely land transformation/conversion. Once these lands are secured through ownership transfers, longterm leases, or local partnerships, fund managers seek to scale agricultural operations up by leveraging agricultural inputs (e.g. genetically engineered seeds, fertilizers, agricultural chemicals, machinery) and water resources. The end objective is almost always to primarily serve global markets, and not domestic ones.
The Oakland Institute estimates that the private financial sector has already invested between $10 to $25 billion in farmland and agriculture in recent years, adding that "given current investment trends, this amount might double or triple in the coming years."
The report repeatedly emphasizes that actual "information regarding agricultural and land investments is highly inaccessible, densely layered, and hidden from the public." Operating through "onshore and offshore partnerships," the base of operations for these funds are "typically located in the tax havens of Delaware and the Caribbean Islands."
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy"
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy or indicators raises concerns regarding their actual practices," the report says.
In addition to more traditional investment vehicles, researchers also investigated "grabs" funded by agribusiness companies with their own private investment structures. Mother Jones reports:
Some of the funds explicitly promote growing genetically modified crops. In at least a few cases, the report finds, the funds partner with food and agriculture giants like Monsanto, Cargill, and DuPont, and not exactly by coincidence. Among the investment fund managers listed in the report are former executives and traders at Monsanto and Cargill. Cargill has two of its own private investment firms.
Confirming their "notoriously opaque" reputation, of the 23 companies profiled--which includes big names like UBS, Soros Fund Management, Global Environment Fund, Prudential, TIAA-CREF and Harvard University's endowment--only five responded to the Institute's request for interviews. The report is based on those conversations as well as a review of company websites, media reports, research papers, and government documents.
Some of the other findings include:
Is your pension funding African land grabs? Or plantations of genetically modified crops? A new report on the shadowy and highly unregulated world of agricultural investment published Tuesday by the Oakland Institute focuses on the funds, endowments and private investment firms behind the practice.
"Betting on World Agriculture" (pdf) looks specifically at the investment vehicles that are capitalizing on the growing food crisis by buying up private land and farm assets, "to resell them at a superior market return after an agreed period of time and/or to generate cash from rents." Reporting on their practices, the report states:
For the most part, [the funds'] projections emphasize growing populations, growing demands for grains or fuel, or changing economic cycles and the need for wealthy investors to reap the benefits of declining resources. Their investment thesis relies on securing and consolidating already productive and well-watered pieces of land at the lowest cost possible, and making a profit from land appreciation and most likely land transformation/conversion. Once these lands are secured through ownership transfers, longterm leases, or local partnerships, fund managers seek to scale agricultural operations up by leveraging agricultural inputs (e.g. genetically engineered seeds, fertilizers, agricultural chemicals, machinery) and water resources. The end objective is almost always to primarily serve global markets, and not domestic ones.
The Oakland Institute estimates that the private financial sector has already invested between $10 to $25 billion in farmland and agriculture in recent years, adding that "given current investment trends, this amount might double or triple in the coming years."
The report repeatedly emphasizes that actual "information regarding agricultural and land investments is highly inaccessible, densely layered, and hidden from the public." Operating through "onshore and offshore partnerships," the base of operations for these funds are "typically located in the tax havens of Delaware and the Caribbean Islands."
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy"
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy or indicators raises concerns regarding their actual practices," the report says.
In addition to more traditional investment vehicles, researchers also investigated "grabs" funded by agribusiness companies with their own private investment structures. Mother Jones reports:
Some of the funds explicitly promote growing genetically modified crops. In at least a few cases, the report finds, the funds partner with food and agriculture giants like Monsanto, Cargill, and DuPont, and not exactly by coincidence. Among the investment fund managers listed in the report are former executives and traders at Monsanto and Cargill. Cargill has two of its own private investment firms.
Confirming their "notoriously opaque" reputation, of the 23 companies profiled--which includes big names like UBS, Soros Fund Management, Global Environment Fund, Prudential, TIAA-CREF and Harvard University's endowment--only five responded to the Institute's request for interviews. The report is based on those conversations as well as a review of company websites, media reports, research papers, and government documents.
Some of the other findings include: