SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A new report by the Oakland Institute delves into the $25 billion dollar world of agricultural investment. (Image: Oakland Institute)
Is your pension funding African land grabs? Or plantations of genetically modified crops? A new report on the shadowy and highly unregulated world of agricultural investment published Tuesday by the Oakland Institute focuses on the funds, endowments and private investment firms behind the practice.
"Betting on World Agriculture" (pdf) looks specifically at the investment vehicles that are capitalizing on the growing food crisis by buying up private land and farm assets, "to resell them at a superior market return after an agreed period of time and/or to generate cash from rents." Reporting on their practices, the report states:
For the most part, [the funds'] projections emphasize growing populations, growing demands for grains or fuel, or changing economic cycles and the need for wealthy investors to reap the benefits of declining resources. Their investment thesis relies on securing and consolidating already productive and well-watered pieces of land at the lowest cost possible, and making a profit from land appreciation and most likely land transformation/conversion. Once these lands are secured through ownership transfers, longterm leases, or local partnerships, fund managers seek to scale agricultural operations up by leveraging agricultural inputs (e.g. genetically engineered seeds, fertilizers, agricultural chemicals, machinery) and water resources. The end objective is almost always to primarily serve global markets, and not domestic ones.
The Oakland Institute estimates that the private financial sector has already invested between $10 to $25 billion in farmland and agriculture in recent years, adding that "given current investment trends, this amount might double or triple in the coming years."
The report repeatedly emphasizes that actual "information regarding agricultural and land investments is highly inaccessible, densely layered, and hidden from the public." Operating through "onshore and offshore partnerships," the base of operations for these funds are "typically located in the tax havens of Delaware and the Caribbean Islands."
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy"
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy or indicators raises concerns regarding their actual practices," the report says.
In addition to more traditional investment vehicles, researchers also investigated "grabs" funded by agribusiness companies with their own private investment structures. Mother Jones reports:
Some of the funds explicitly promote growing genetically modified crops. In at least a few cases, the report finds, the funds partner with food and agriculture giants like Monsanto, Cargill, and DuPont, and not exactly by coincidence. Among the investment fund managers listed in the report are former executives and traders at Monsanto and Cargill. Cargill has two of its own private investment firms.
Confirming their "notoriously opaque" reputation, of the 23 companies profiled--which includes big names like UBS, Soros Fund Management, Global Environment Fund, Prudential, TIAA-CREF and Harvard University's endowment--only five responded to the Institute's request for interviews. The report is based on those conversations as well as a review of company websites, media reports, research papers, and government documents.
Some of the other findings include:
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Is your pension funding African land grabs? Or plantations of genetically modified crops? A new report on the shadowy and highly unregulated world of agricultural investment published Tuesday by the Oakland Institute focuses on the funds, endowments and private investment firms behind the practice.
"Betting on World Agriculture" (pdf) looks specifically at the investment vehicles that are capitalizing on the growing food crisis by buying up private land and farm assets, "to resell them at a superior market return after an agreed period of time and/or to generate cash from rents." Reporting on their practices, the report states:
For the most part, [the funds'] projections emphasize growing populations, growing demands for grains or fuel, or changing economic cycles and the need for wealthy investors to reap the benefits of declining resources. Their investment thesis relies on securing and consolidating already productive and well-watered pieces of land at the lowest cost possible, and making a profit from land appreciation and most likely land transformation/conversion. Once these lands are secured through ownership transfers, longterm leases, or local partnerships, fund managers seek to scale agricultural operations up by leveraging agricultural inputs (e.g. genetically engineered seeds, fertilizers, agricultural chemicals, machinery) and water resources. The end objective is almost always to primarily serve global markets, and not domestic ones.
The Oakland Institute estimates that the private financial sector has already invested between $10 to $25 billion in farmland and agriculture in recent years, adding that "given current investment trends, this amount might double or triple in the coming years."
The report repeatedly emphasizes that actual "information regarding agricultural and land investments is highly inaccessible, densely layered, and hidden from the public." Operating through "onshore and offshore partnerships," the base of operations for these funds are "typically located in the tax havens of Delaware and the Caribbean Islands."
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy"
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy or indicators raises concerns regarding their actual practices," the report says.
In addition to more traditional investment vehicles, researchers also investigated "grabs" funded by agribusiness companies with their own private investment structures. Mother Jones reports:
Some of the funds explicitly promote growing genetically modified crops. In at least a few cases, the report finds, the funds partner with food and agriculture giants like Monsanto, Cargill, and DuPont, and not exactly by coincidence. Among the investment fund managers listed in the report are former executives and traders at Monsanto and Cargill. Cargill has two of its own private investment firms.
Confirming their "notoriously opaque" reputation, of the 23 companies profiled--which includes big names like UBS, Soros Fund Management, Global Environment Fund, Prudential, TIAA-CREF and Harvard University's endowment--only five responded to the Institute's request for interviews. The report is based on those conversations as well as a review of company websites, media reports, research papers, and government documents.
Some of the other findings include:
Is your pension funding African land grabs? Or plantations of genetically modified crops? A new report on the shadowy and highly unregulated world of agricultural investment published Tuesday by the Oakland Institute focuses on the funds, endowments and private investment firms behind the practice.
"Betting on World Agriculture" (pdf) looks specifically at the investment vehicles that are capitalizing on the growing food crisis by buying up private land and farm assets, "to resell them at a superior market return after an agreed period of time and/or to generate cash from rents." Reporting on their practices, the report states:
For the most part, [the funds'] projections emphasize growing populations, growing demands for grains or fuel, or changing economic cycles and the need for wealthy investors to reap the benefits of declining resources. Their investment thesis relies on securing and consolidating already productive and well-watered pieces of land at the lowest cost possible, and making a profit from land appreciation and most likely land transformation/conversion. Once these lands are secured through ownership transfers, longterm leases, or local partnerships, fund managers seek to scale agricultural operations up by leveraging agricultural inputs (e.g. genetically engineered seeds, fertilizers, agricultural chemicals, machinery) and water resources. The end objective is almost always to primarily serve global markets, and not domestic ones.
The Oakland Institute estimates that the private financial sector has already invested between $10 to $25 billion in farmland and agriculture in recent years, adding that "given current investment trends, this amount might double or triple in the coming years."
The report repeatedly emphasizes that actual "information regarding agricultural and land investments is highly inaccessible, densely layered, and hidden from the public." Operating through "onshore and offshore partnerships," the base of operations for these funds are "typically located in the tax havens of Delaware and the Caribbean Islands."
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy"
"There remains a critical lack of understanding about how investments are implemented on the ground, and the reluctance of fund managers to disclose basic information including their environmental policy or indicators raises concerns regarding their actual practices," the report says.
In addition to more traditional investment vehicles, researchers also investigated "grabs" funded by agribusiness companies with their own private investment structures. Mother Jones reports:
Some of the funds explicitly promote growing genetically modified crops. In at least a few cases, the report finds, the funds partner with food and agriculture giants like Monsanto, Cargill, and DuPont, and not exactly by coincidence. Among the investment fund managers listed in the report are former executives and traders at Monsanto and Cargill. Cargill has two of its own private investment firms.
Confirming their "notoriously opaque" reputation, of the 23 companies profiled--which includes big names like UBS, Soros Fund Management, Global Environment Fund, Prudential, TIAA-CREF and Harvard University's endowment--only five responded to the Institute's request for interviews. The report is based on those conversations as well as a review of company websites, media reports, research papers, and government documents.
Some of the other findings include: